Advancing culturally responsive clinical supervision: exploring supervisees' perspectives and the development of the Clinician Cultural Humility Scale
Advancing culturally responsive clinical supervision: exploring supervisees' perspectives and the development of the Clinician Cultural Humility Scale
Clinical supervision is essential for providing ongoing support and development to supervisees, with significant implications to clinical practice. There has been a recent emphasis on ensuring that culture is considered and integrated into the supervision space. However, more insight is needed into how supervisees experience culturally responsive supervision and how can we assist clinicians to develop their cultural humility.
Chapter one aims to set the context of the two completed studies by expanding further on the process and rationale. Specifically, reflections of conducting the research from the author’s personal cultural lens is considered. The chapter also addresses the shift of terminology from cultural competence to humility, and the use of incorporating the Delphi method within the empirical study.
The second chapter is a systematic review that aimed to further explore supervisees’ perspectives of the impact of receiving culturally responsive clinical supervision. A total of 15 papers were included in the thematic synthesis which identified three main themes of ‘strengthened the supervisory relationship’, ‘supported professional development and learning’, and ‘facilitated culturally responsive clinical work’. Further clinical and research implications are discussed.
The final chapter details a quantitative study that developed a cultural humility measure for clinical supervision and assessed its psychometric properties. The study used a three-part design with two samples; the first stage devised the initial scale (Clinician Cultural Humility Scale; CCHS), the second stage used the Delphi method to revise the scale, and the third stage used a cross-sectional survey to assess and further revise the scale. The factor analyses found a 10-item scale with three subfactors, namely: ‘Awareness and Self-reflection’, ‘Openness in Clinical Practice’, and ‘Supportive Interactions’. The CCHS showed good internal reliability and, overall, the correlation analyses showed convergent relationships with existing scales. The results, implications and recommendations for future research are identified and discussed.
Keywords: clinical supervision, cultural responsivity, cultural humility.
University of Southampton
De Luca, Paola
760e72db-2fbb-44de-9e01-e68f7c607c57
2025
De Luca, Paola
760e72db-2fbb-44de-9e01-e68f7c607c57
Ononaiye, Margo
494d4a0d-a1f8-431a-8316-d97d5d0b600b
De Luca, Paola
(2025)
Advancing culturally responsive clinical supervision: exploring supervisees' perspectives and the development of the Clinician Cultural Humility Scale.
University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis, 205pp.
Record type:
Thesis
(Doctoral)
Abstract
Clinical supervision is essential for providing ongoing support and development to supervisees, with significant implications to clinical practice. There has been a recent emphasis on ensuring that culture is considered and integrated into the supervision space. However, more insight is needed into how supervisees experience culturally responsive supervision and how can we assist clinicians to develop their cultural humility.
Chapter one aims to set the context of the two completed studies by expanding further on the process and rationale. Specifically, reflections of conducting the research from the author’s personal cultural lens is considered. The chapter also addresses the shift of terminology from cultural competence to humility, and the use of incorporating the Delphi method within the empirical study.
The second chapter is a systematic review that aimed to further explore supervisees’ perspectives of the impact of receiving culturally responsive clinical supervision. A total of 15 papers were included in the thematic synthesis which identified three main themes of ‘strengthened the supervisory relationship’, ‘supported professional development and learning’, and ‘facilitated culturally responsive clinical work’. Further clinical and research implications are discussed.
The final chapter details a quantitative study that developed a cultural humility measure for clinical supervision and assessed its psychometric properties. The study used a three-part design with two samples; the first stage devised the initial scale (Clinician Cultural Humility Scale; CCHS), the second stage used the Delphi method to revise the scale, and the third stage used a cross-sectional survey to assess and further revise the scale. The factor analyses found a 10-item scale with three subfactors, namely: ‘Awareness and Self-reflection’, ‘Openness in Clinical Practice’, and ‘Supportive Interactions’. The CCHS showed good internal reliability and, overall, the correlation analyses showed convergent relationships with existing scales. The results, implications and recommendations for future research are identified and discussed.
Keywords: clinical supervision, cultural responsivity, cultural humility.
Text
Advancing Culturally Responsive Clinical Supervision
Text
Final-thesis-submission-Examination-Miss-Paola-De-Luca
Restricted to Repository staff only
More information
Published date: 2025
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 504329
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/504329
PURE UUID: 8ef7b669-0dbb-4287-b40f-a99b0a2d56e9
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 04 Sep 2025 16:50
Last modified: 25 Sep 2025 17:00
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Paola De Luca
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics