The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Effectiveness of mathematical and simulation models for improving quality of care in emergency departments: a systematic literature review

Effectiveness of mathematical and simulation models for improving quality of care in emergency departments: a systematic literature review
Effectiveness of mathematical and simulation models for improving quality of care in emergency departments: a systematic literature review
This systematic literature review aims to critically evaluate the use of mathematical and simulation models within emergency departments (EDs) and assess their potential to improve the quality of care. This review emphasises the critical need for quality enhancement in healthcare systems, specifically focusing on EDs. This review incorporates studies investigating the quality of care provided in ED settings, employing assorted mathematical and simulation models for adult populations. Based on the selected studies, a narrative approach was used to synthesise the findings, focusing on outcome classification, simulation, and modelling. There are six outcome dimensions: safety, effectiveness, patient-centeredness, timeliness, efficiency, and equity. This review analysed 112 studies, uncovering a distinct focus on a set of key performance measures within emergency department (ED) operations, accounting for 222 instances across these studies. Measures assessing timeliness were most frequent, occurring 111 times, indicating a strong emphasis on operational efficiency aspects such as waiting times and patient flow. A total of 75 examinations were conducted on efficiency-related measures, specifically focusing on identifying and addressing operational bottlenecks and optimising resource utilisation. On the other hand, safety, patient-centeredness, and effectiveness were not as commonly represented, with only three, four, and 29 instances, respectively. This review highlights the considerable potential of mathematical and simulation models to enhance ED operations, particularly regarding timeliness and efficiency. However, aspects such as patient safety, effectiveness, and patient-centredness were under-represented, while equity was absent across the studies, indicating a clear need for further research. These findings emphasise the importance of adopting a more thorough approach to evaluating and improving the quality of emergency care. Future research should also concentrate on refining data management practices, incorporating observational studies, and exploring various simulation tools to develop a more balanced and inclusive understanding of these models' applications.
1869-0327
825-837
Almohaya, Thamer A.
83169e60-01de-4fc5-9b19-3a326065cb9a
Batchelor, James
e53c36c7-aa7f-4fae-8113-30bfbb9b36ee
Arruda, Edilson
8eb3bd83-e883-4bf3-bfbc-7887c5daa911
Almohaya, Thamer A.
83169e60-01de-4fc5-9b19-3a326065cb9a
Batchelor, James
e53c36c7-aa7f-4fae-8113-30bfbb9b36ee
Arruda, Edilson
8eb3bd83-e883-4bf3-bfbc-7887c5daa911

Almohaya, Thamer A., Batchelor, James and Arruda, Edilson (2025) Effectiveness of mathematical and simulation models for improving quality of care in emergency departments: a systematic literature review. Applied Clinical Informatics, 16 (4), 825-837. (doi:10.1055/a-2591-3930).

Record type: Article

Abstract

This systematic literature review aims to critically evaluate the use of mathematical and simulation models within emergency departments (EDs) and assess their potential to improve the quality of care. This review emphasises the critical need for quality enhancement in healthcare systems, specifically focusing on EDs. This review incorporates studies investigating the quality of care provided in ED settings, employing assorted mathematical and simulation models for adult populations. Based on the selected studies, a narrative approach was used to synthesise the findings, focusing on outcome classification, simulation, and modelling. There are six outcome dimensions: safety, effectiveness, patient-centeredness, timeliness, efficiency, and equity. This review analysed 112 studies, uncovering a distinct focus on a set of key performance measures within emergency department (ED) operations, accounting for 222 instances across these studies. Measures assessing timeliness were most frequent, occurring 111 times, indicating a strong emphasis on operational efficiency aspects such as waiting times and patient flow. A total of 75 examinations were conducted on efficiency-related measures, specifically focusing on identifying and addressing operational bottlenecks and optimising resource utilisation. On the other hand, safety, patient-centeredness, and effectiveness were not as commonly represented, with only three, four, and 29 instances, respectively. This review highlights the considerable potential of mathematical and simulation models to enhance ED operations, particularly regarding timeliness and efficiency. However, aspects such as patient safety, effectiveness, and patient-centredness were under-represented, while equity was absent across the studies, indicating a clear need for further research. These findings emphasise the importance of adopting a more thorough approach to evaluating and improving the quality of emergency care. Future research should also concentrate on refining data management practices, incorporating observational studies, and exploring various simulation tools to develop a more balanced and inclusive understanding of these models' applications.

Text
SLR_Thamer_FinalClean Version_ForPure - Accepted Manuscript
Restricted to Repository staff only until 22 August 2026.
Request a copy

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 17 April 2025
Published date: 22 August 2025

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 504352
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/504352
ISSN: 1869-0327
PURE UUID: fd3a77de-35f0-4199-b395-f7b097c4855f
ORCID for Thamer A. Almohaya: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-6368-6968
ORCID for James Batchelor: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-5307-552X
ORCID for Edilson Arruda: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-9835-352X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 08 Sep 2025 16:40
Last modified: 09 Sep 2025 02:07

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Thamer A. Almohaya ORCID iD
Author: James Batchelor ORCID iD
Author: Edilson Arruda ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×