The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Should we measure and modulate inflammation before cochlear implantation to improve long-term hearing outcomes?

Should we measure and modulate inflammation before cochlear implantation to improve long-term hearing outcomes?
Should we measure and modulate inflammation before cochlear implantation to improve long-term hearing outcomes?
Background: deaf children undergoing cochlear implantation have the potential to meet developmental milestones in line with their biological hearing peers. Unfortunately, hearing and language outcomes following implantation are variable. The biological factors contributing to underperformance are poorly understood. This study aims to determine whether the inflammatory/immune state of the ear is one factor contributing to underperformance.

Insertion of an electrode array elicits a variable inflammatory response which can result in scar tissue (fibrosis) around the array1. An aberrant response can result in increased inflammation and fibrosis and contribute to poorer hearing2.
Macrophages, tissue-resident immune cells, acquire ‘memory’ to previous insults (infections) which can result in an increased inflammatory response to subsequent insults3. Within the ear, an increased inflammatory response will cause tissue damage and contribute to hearing loss4; after implantation, this may contribute to greater fibrosis and poorer hearing outcomes. Early identification of inflammatory risk could mitigate this.


Methods: CHIEF (cochlear implants and inner ear inflammation) is a cross-sectional study of children and young people undergoing cochlear implantation. Tissue and fluid samples will be collected from the ear/(s) being implanted during surgery including middle ear mucosa, a middle ear swab and cochlear fluid. A nasal swab and blood sample will be collected at the time of surgery. Following implantation, routine clinical outcome measures and health data will be collected for up to five years.
We hypothesise that the tissue response to inflammation varies due to the individual inflammatory differences in the ear at the time of implantation. We will use CosMx5, a spatial transcriptomics technique that measures spatial gene expression, to measure the inflammatory state of the middle ear mucosal samples. We will characterise the expression profile of the major cell types identified in the middle ear mucosa samples.

Results: to gather pilot data, we will generate a spatial gene expression profile of the key immune regulators in the middle ear (macrophages) and the surrounding cells. We will use bioinformatic analysis to determine if there are differences in gene expression of the cells within and between samples and determine whether these cells are communicating with each other. This pilot data will allow us to determine whether this technique yields valuable gene expression data for the major middle ear cell types and whether this technique should be used to analyse all mucosal samples collected in CHIEF.


Conclusion: this will be the first spatial gene analysis of cells in the middle ear of children and young people undergoing cochlear implantation. This work will provide new knowledge of the immune biology of the ear in children undergoing implantation and inform our understanding of biological factors that can influence hearing outcomes with an implant.

Through CHIEF, we will generate a database containing clinical and medical history of children undergoing cochlear implantation and a tissue bank. We will analyse the relationship between the biological data and clinical data (collected over five years) to interrogate how the immune state of the ear is associated with long-term hearing outcomes with an implant. If a predictable relationship is determined, there is potential to improve long-term hearing outcomes in children following implantation by modulating inflammation, using anti-inflammatory therapies.

Reference
1.Seyyedi, M. & Nadol, J. B. Intracochlear inflammatory response to cochlear implant electrodes in humans. Otology and Neurotology 35, 1545–1551 (2014).
2.Hough, K. et al. Inflammation at the tissue-electrode interface in a case of rapid deterioration in hearing performance leading to explant after cochlear implantation. Otology & Neurotology 42, e445–e450 (2021).
3.Cunningham, C., Wilcockson, D. C., Campion, S., Lunnon, K. & Perry, V. H. Central and systemic endotoxin challenges exacerbate the local inflammatory response and increase neuronal death during chronic neurodegeneration. Journal of Neuroscience 25, 9275–9284 (2005).
4.Xia, A. et al. Chronic suppurative otitis media causes macrophage-associated sensorineural hearing loss. J Neuroinflammation 19, 224 (2022).
5.He, S. et al. High-plex imaging of RNA and proteins at subcellular resolution in fixed tissue by spatial molecular imaging. Nat Biotechnol 40, 1794–1806 (2022).


Cochlear implants, Inflammation, Hearing loss, Outcomes, Macrophages
Hough, Kate
81d8630c-6e02-4bea-858a-377717476f6e
Nichani, Jaya
b0296425-62e3-4a7c-96e3-8218f9749e8b
Findlay, Callum Andrew
a8f4f69f-e3bc-4a5f-b1d8-c5e38ba0d00e
Bruce, Iain A.
a95cbe70-8244-4d9e-9cef-88765c491c17
Newman, Tracey
322290cb-2e9c-445d-a047-00b1bea39a25
Hough, Kate
81d8630c-6e02-4bea-858a-377717476f6e
Nichani, Jaya
b0296425-62e3-4a7c-96e3-8218f9749e8b
Findlay, Callum Andrew
a8f4f69f-e3bc-4a5f-b1d8-c5e38ba0d00e
Bruce, Iain A.
a95cbe70-8244-4d9e-9cef-88765c491c17
Newman, Tracey
322290cb-2e9c-445d-a047-00b1bea39a25

Hough, Kate, Nichani, Jaya, Findlay, Callum Andrew, Bruce, Iain A. and Newman, Tracey (2025) Should we measure and modulate inflammation before cochlear implantation to improve long-term hearing outcomes? British Cochlear Implant Group Conference 2025, London, London, United Kingdom. 01 Apr - 02 Jul 2025.

Record type: Conference or Workshop Item (Poster)

Abstract

Background: deaf children undergoing cochlear implantation have the potential to meet developmental milestones in line with their biological hearing peers. Unfortunately, hearing and language outcomes following implantation are variable. The biological factors contributing to underperformance are poorly understood. This study aims to determine whether the inflammatory/immune state of the ear is one factor contributing to underperformance.

Insertion of an electrode array elicits a variable inflammatory response which can result in scar tissue (fibrosis) around the array1. An aberrant response can result in increased inflammation and fibrosis and contribute to poorer hearing2.
Macrophages, tissue-resident immune cells, acquire ‘memory’ to previous insults (infections) which can result in an increased inflammatory response to subsequent insults3. Within the ear, an increased inflammatory response will cause tissue damage and contribute to hearing loss4; after implantation, this may contribute to greater fibrosis and poorer hearing outcomes. Early identification of inflammatory risk could mitigate this.


Methods: CHIEF (cochlear implants and inner ear inflammation) is a cross-sectional study of children and young people undergoing cochlear implantation. Tissue and fluid samples will be collected from the ear/(s) being implanted during surgery including middle ear mucosa, a middle ear swab and cochlear fluid. A nasal swab and blood sample will be collected at the time of surgery. Following implantation, routine clinical outcome measures and health data will be collected for up to five years.
We hypothesise that the tissue response to inflammation varies due to the individual inflammatory differences in the ear at the time of implantation. We will use CosMx5, a spatial transcriptomics technique that measures spatial gene expression, to measure the inflammatory state of the middle ear mucosal samples. We will characterise the expression profile of the major cell types identified in the middle ear mucosa samples.

Results: to gather pilot data, we will generate a spatial gene expression profile of the key immune regulators in the middle ear (macrophages) and the surrounding cells. We will use bioinformatic analysis to determine if there are differences in gene expression of the cells within and between samples and determine whether these cells are communicating with each other. This pilot data will allow us to determine whether this technique yields valuable gene expression data for the major middle ear cell types and whether this technique should be used to analyse all mucosal samples collected in CHIEF.


Conclusion: this will be the first spatial gene analysis of cells in the middle ear of children and young people undergoing cochlear implantation. This work will provide new knowledge of the immune biology of the ear in children undergoing implantation and inform our understanding of biological factors that can influence hearing outcomes with an implant.

Through CHIEF, we will generate a database containing clinical and medical history of children undergoing cochlear implantation and a tissue bank. We will analyse the relationship between the biological data and clinical data (collected over five years) to interrogate how the immune state of the ear is associated with long-term hearing outcomes with an implant. If a predictable relationship is determined, there is potential to improve long-term hearing outcomes in children following implantation by modulating inflammation, using anti-inflammatory therapies.

Reference
1.Seyyedi, M. & Nadol, J. B. Intracochlear inflammatory response to cochlear implant electrodes in humans. Otology and Neurotology 35, 1545–1551 (2014).
2.Hough, K. et al. Inflammation at the tissue-electrode interface in a case of rapid deterioration in hearing performance leading to explant after cochlear implantation. Otology & Neurotology 42, e445–e450 (2021).
3.Cunningham, C., Wilcockson, D. C., Campion, S., Lunnon, K. & Perry, V. H. Central and systemic endotoxin challenges exacerbate the local inflammatory response and increase neuronal death during chronic neurodegeneration. Journal of Neuroscience 25, 9275–9284 (2005).
4.Xia, A. et al. Chronic suppurative otitis media causes macrophage-associated sensorineural hearing loss. J Neuroinflammation 19, 224 (2022).
5.He, S. et al. High-plex imaging of RNA and proteins at subcellular resolution in fixed tissue by spatial molecular imaging. Nat Biotechnol 40, 1794–1806 (2022).


This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 1 April 2025
Venue - Dates: British Cochlear Implant Group Conference 2025, London, London, United Kingdom, 2025-04-01 - 2025-07-02
Keywords: Cochlear implants, Inflammation, Hearing loss, Outcomes, Macrophages

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 504411
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/504411
PURE UUID: 44306170-7573-44da-99a5-165cb181066c
ORCID for Kate Hough: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-5160-2517
ORCID for Callum Andrew Findlay: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-0104-3435
ORCID for Tracey Newman: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-3727-9258

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 09 Sep 2025 16:40
Last modified: 30 Sep 2025 02:18

Export record

Contributors

Author: Kate Hough ORCID iD
Author: Jaya Nichani
Author: Callum Andrew Findlay ORCID iD
Author: Iain A. Bruce
Author: Tracey Newman ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×