“I don’t think there’s necessarily a one size fits all” negotiating competing priorities in nurse shift scheduling: a qualitative study
“I don’t think there’s necessarily a one size fits all” negotiating competing priorities in nurse shift scheduling: a qualitative study
Background: the nursing workforce globally faces significant challenges, including burnout, stress, and absenteeism, exacerbated by unsafe staffing levels and suboptimal working conditions. In England, many nursing staff express intentions to leave their roles, driven by work-life imbalance. This study explores how the preferences and constraints of nursing staff, nurse managers, and hospital directors interact to influence shift scheduling decisions within the NHS, aiming to identify strategies that reconcile individual wellbeing with organisational imperatives.
Methods: this qualitative study employed framework analysis, guided by the Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument (TKI) to understand conflict management approaches in shift scheduling. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 17 nursing staff, five nurse managers, and six hospital directors across five diverse NHS Trusts in England. Interviews were conducted remotely, transcribed verbatim, and analysed to identify key themes and patterns.
Results: three primary themes were identified: Balancing Choice with Consistency, Predictability, and Flexibility; Adequate Rest and Recovery Between Shifts; and Enjoyment and Engagement at Work. The study found that collaborative and compromising conflict management approaches were most effective in preventing potential conflicts from escalating into actual conflicts. Flexible and predictable scheduling was crucial for enhancing nurse wellbeing and retention, while rigid policies often led to increased turnover and reduced morale. The study also highlighted the importance of considering external constraints, such as caring responsibilities, which can limit the effectiveness of workplace solutions.
Conclusions: effective nurse shift scheduling requires a blend of conflict management strategies, with an emphasis on collaborative and compromising approaches. By prioritising flexible scheduling and proactive communication, healthcare organisations can better support their nursing workforce, enhancing both individual wellbeing and organisational efficiency. These findings have significant implications for improving the sustainability and quality of healthcare service provision.
Barker, Hannah Ruth
94312934-2508-4d08-a5fe-6f54544f96cf
Griffiths, Peter
ac7afec1-7d72-4b83-b016-3a43e245265b
Dall'ora, Chiara
4501b172-005c-4fad-86da-2d63978ffdfd
11 August 2025
Barker, Hannah Ruth
94312934-2508-4d08-a5fe-6f54544f96cf
Griffiths, Peter
ac7afec1-7d72-4b83-b016-3a43e245265b
Dall'ora, Chiara
4501b172-005c-4fad-86da-2d63978ffdfd
Barker, Hannah Ruth, Griffiths, Peter and Dall'ora, Chiara
(2025)
“I don’t think there’s necessarily a one size fits all” negotiating competing priorities in nurse shift scheduling: a qualitative study.
BMC Nursing, 24.
(doi:10.1186/s12912-025-03705-6).
Abstract
Background: the nursing workforce globally faces significant challenges, including burnout, stress, and absenteeism, exacerbated by unsafe staffing levels and suboptimal working conditions. In England, many nursing staff express intentions to leave their roles, driven by work-life imbalance. This study explores how the preferences and constraints of nursing staff, nurse managers, and hospital directors interact to influence shift scheduling decisions within the NHS, aiming to identify strategies that reconcile individual wellbeing with organisational imperatives.
Methods: this qualitative study employed framework analysis, guided by the Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument (TKI) to understand conflict management approaches in shift scheduling. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 17 nursing staff, five nurse managers, and six hospital directors across five diverse NHS Trusts in England. Interviews were conducted remotely, transcribed verbatim, and analysed to identify key themes and patterns.
Results: three primary themes were identified: Balancing Choice with Consistency, Predictability, and Flexibility; Adequate Rest and Recovery Between Shifts; and Enjoyment and Engagement at Work. The study found that collaborative and compromising conflict management approaches were most effective in preventing potential conflicts from escalating into actual conflicts. Flexible and predictable scheduling was crucial for enhancing nurse wellbeing and retention, while rigid policies often led to increased turnover and reduced morale. The study also highlighted the importance of considering external constraints, such as caring responsibilities, which can limit the effectiveness of workplace solutions.
Conclusions: effective nurse shift scheduling requires a blend of conflict management strategies, with an emphasis on collaborative and compromising approaches. By prioritising flexible scheduling and proactive communication, healthcare organisations can better support their nursing workforce, enhancing both individual wellbeing and organisational efficiency. These findings have significant implications for improving the sustainability and quality of healthcare service provision.
Text
Manuscript BMC Nursing Revision 3.1
- Accepted Manuscript
Text
s12912-025-03705-6
- Version of Record
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 4 August 2025
Published date: 11 August 2025
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 504556
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/504556
ISSN: 1472-6955
PURE UUID: e673c07a-869b-4053-8d2f-d124b9c0fd65
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 15 Sep 2025 16:38
Last modified: 17 Sep 2025 01:58
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Hannah Ruth Barker
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics