The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety of a next-generation mRNA-1283 COVID-19 vaccine compared with the mRNA-1273 vaccine (NextCOVE): results from a phase 3, randomised, observer-blind, active-controlled trial

Efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety of a next-generation mRNA-1283 COVID-19 vaccine compared with the mRNA-1273 vaccine (NextCOVE): results from a phase 3, randomised, observer-blind, active-controlled trial
Efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety of a next-generation mRNA-1283 COVID-19 vaccine compared with the mRNA-1273 vaccine (NextCOVE): results from a phase 3, randomised, observer-blind, active-controlled trial

Background: mRNA-1283 is an investigational, next-generation COVID-19 vaccine that encodes only the immunodominant regions of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein—the receptor-binding domain (RBD) and the N-terminal domain rather than the full-length spike used in currently authorised mRNA vaccines. We evaluated the relative vaccine efficacy (rVE), immunogenicity, and safety of mRNA-1283 compared to the first-generation vaccine (mRNA-1273). Methods: This randomised, observer-masked, active-controlled, phase 3 trial (NextCOVE) was conducted in individuals (aged ≥12 years) with no evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection within 90 days of screening in the USA, the UK, and Canada. Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive one 10 μg dose of the bivalent formulation of mRNA-1283 (original plus omicron BA.4/BA.5) or 50 μg of the bivalent mRNA-1273, encoding the same variants. Randomisation was stratified by age (12–17 years, 18–64 years, and ≥65 years). Primary objectives comparing mRNA-1283 with mRNA-1273 were non-inferior rVE to prevent a first event of COVID-19 from 14 days after study injection to the end of follow-up (assessed in the per-protocol set for efficacy, with non-inferiority declared when the lower bound of the α-adjusted two-sided CI for rVE was greater than –10%), non-inferior immunogenicity at day 29 (assessed in the per-protocol immunogenicity subset, with non-inferiority declared when the lower bounds of the CIs for the geometric mean concentration ratios [GMRs] of neutralising antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 D614G and omicron BA.4/BA.5 were >0·667 and the lower bounds of the 95% CI seroresponse rate differences for the two variants were greater than –10%), and safety (assessed in the safety set, which included all participants who received a vaccination). The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05815498) and is complete. Findings: Between March 28 and Aug 23, 2023, we screened 13 054 individuals for eligibility and randomly allocated 11 454 participants (5728 to mRNA-1283 and 5726 to mRNA-1273). 1177 confirmed COVID-19 events occurred up to Jan 31, 2024 (560 [9·9%] of 5679 in mRNA1283.222 and 617 [10·8%] of 5687 in mRNA-1273.222). The median age of participants at enrolment was 56 years (IQR 38–66). Of the 11 417 participants who received a vaccine, 6200 (54·3%) were female and 5217 (45·7%) were male; 9381 (82·2%) were White; and 1510 (13·2%) were Hispanic or Latino. Of the total cohort, 992 (8·7%) participants were aged 12–17 years, 7151 (62·6%) were aged 18–64 years, and 3274 (28·7%) were 65 years and older; in addition, 6857 participants (60·1%) were 50 years and older. The rVE point estimate was 9·3% (99·4% CI –6·6 to 22·8; p=0·0005). The GMR was 1·3 (95% CI 1·2 to 1·5) for BA.4/BA.5 and 1·2 (1·1 to 1·4) for D614G. The day-29 seroresponse rate difference was 14·4% (95% CI 9·3 to 19·4) for BA.4/BA.5 and 10·7% (6·0 to 15·4) for D614G. Local and systemic adverse reactions were similar between mRNA-1283 and mRNA-1273; mRNA-1283 was associated with fewer injection-site pain reactions than mRNA-1273 (3905 [68·5%] of 5701 vs 4419 [77·5%] of 5705, respectively). The frequency of unsolicited adverse events, serious adverse events, and medically attended adverse events were similar between groups during the first 28 days after injection. One event of sudden death occurred in a participant with underlying cardiovascular disease in the mRNA-1273 group; it was reported as related to vaccination due to its temporal association. Interpretation: mRNA-1283 was well-tolerated. The rVE and immunogenicity non-inferiority criteria were met, with higher antibody responses for mRNA-1283 versus mRNA-1273. The potential clinical benefit of mRNA-1283 versus mRNA-1273 needs to be confirmed in post-marketing evaluation. Funding: Moderna.

1473-3099
Chalkias, Spyros
4121901c-f8f1-4394-ae35-a52f49e0a7f1
Dennis, Patrick
00101bc5-72bf-412d-8f68-d0bba85ca374
Petersen, Dena
2fec1c72-ccaf-442f-8ad5-0e43afa4f74c
Radhakrishnan, Krishnakumar
105318b5-1b84-4b1a-a973-fbc5fe5e8690
Vaughan, Leroy
4f125f1c-7f43-4a25-a746-941836f15870
Handforth, Reem
c77b8766-f2cc-4f7f-9bbb-200281002101
Rossi, Alexandra
7e2b86b0-b7e1-4acc-8cf6-6812485bd608
Wahid, Rahnuma
deb7ad43-f7fa-431d-b970-a5be79b9f38e
Edwards, Darin K.
750f6516-3b80-4ba6-bd57-74a2c6fa72af
Feng, Jing
abe71f9f-9a10-4b58-b074-758228efc935
Deng, Weiping
cedd09e0-d9c8-4653-b895-cd21d6fb61a8
Zhou, Honghong
1e5db5b6-6ac1-4cd4-8ce3-f2e4eebb8c49
De Windt, Elizabeth
48ea435d-f5db-4202-af3f-3cef28612fcb
Urdaneta, Veronica
386a575b-d769-4a78-ab78-0ec3e7320203
Paila, Yamuna
3080d861-9811-4482-9dca-6b2f01b64bf2
Girard, Bethany
5de71355-8050-4d22-86d8-81929863b3e7
Faust, Saul N.
f97df780-9f9b-418e-b349-7adf63e150c1
Walsh, Stephen R.
4fea74a8-da3d-4387-a49e-ed25708d818e
Cosgrove, Catherine A.
55f5bcfc-b872-4c01-84f0-0a19c05b5b99
Miller, Jacqueline
7a695a01-ec5f-4220-ad48-40c44425f09a
Das, Rituparna
078efb69-e045-4e30-9f13-40523047098d
Chalkias, Spyros
4121901c-f8f1-4394-ae35-a52f49e0a7f1
Dennis, Patrick
00101bc5-72bf-412d-8f68-d0bba85ca374
Petersen, Dena
2fec1c72-ccaf-442f-8ad5-0e43afa4f74c
Radhakrishnan, Krishnakumar
105318b5-1b84-4b1a-a973-fbc5fe5e8690
Vaughan, Leroy
4f125f1c-7f43-4a25-a746-941836f15870
Handforth, Reem
c77b8766-f2cc-4f7f-9bbb-200281002101
Rossi, Alexandra
7e2b86b0-b7e1-4acc-8cf6-6812485bd608
Wahid, Rahnuma
deb7ad43-f7fa-431d-b970-a5be79b9f38e
Edwards, Darin K.
750f6516-3b80-4ba6-bd57-74a2c6fa72af
Feng, Jing
abe71f9f-9a10-4b58-b074-758228efc935
Deng, Weiping
cedd09e0-d9c8-4653-b895-cd21d6fb61a8
Zhou, Honghong
1e5db5b6-6ac1-4cd4-8ce3-f2e4eebb8c49
De Windt, Elizabeth
48ea435d-f5db-4202-af3f-3cef28612fcb
Urdaneta, Veronica
386a575b-d769-4a78-ab78-0ec3e7320203
Paila, Yamuna
3080d861-9811-4482-9dca-6b2f01b64bf2
Girard, Bethany
5de71355-8050-4d22-86d8-81929863b3e7
Faust, Saul N.
f97df780-9f9b-418e-b349-7adf63e150c1
Walsh, Stephen R.
4fea74a8-da3d-4387-a49e-ed25708d818e
Cosgrove, Catherine A.
55f5bcfc-b872-4c01-84f0-0a19c05b5b99
Miller, Jacqueline
7a695a01-ec5f-4220-ad48-40c44425f09a
Das, Rituparna
078efb69-e045-4e30-9f13-40523047098d

Chalkias, Spyros, Dennis, Patrick, Petersen, Dena, Radhakrishnan, Krishnakumar, Vaughan, Leroy, Handforth, Reem, Rossi, Alexandra, Wahid, Rahnuma, Edwards, Darin K., Feng, Jing, Deng, Weiping, Zhou, Honghong, De Windt, Elizabeth, Urdaneta, Veronica, Paila, Yamuna, Girard, Bethany, Faust, Saul N., Walsh, Stephen R., Cosgrove, Catherine A., Miller, Jacqueline and Das, Rituparna (2025) Efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety of a next-generation mRNA-1283 COVID-19 vaccine compared with the mRNA-1273 vaccine (NextCOVE): results from a phase 3, randomised, observer-blind, active-controlled trial. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. (doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(25)00236-1).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: mRNA-1283 is an investigational, next-generation COVID-19 vaccine that encodes only the immunodominant regions of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein—the receptor-binding domain (RBD) and the N-terminal domain rather than the full-length spike used in currently authorised mRNA vaccines. We evaluated the relative vaccine efficacy (rVE), immunogenicity, and safety of mRNA-1283 compared to the first-generation vaccine (mRNA-1273). Methods: This randomised, observer-masked, active-controlled, phase 3 trial (NextCOVE) was conducted in individuals (aged ≥12 years) with no evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection within 90 days of screening in the USA, the UK, and Canada. Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive one 10 μg dose of the bivalent formulation of mRNA-1283 (original plus omicron BA.4/BA.5) or 50 μg of the bivalent mRNA-1273, encoding the same variants. Randomisation was stratified by age (12–17 years, 18–64 years, and ≥65 years). Primary objectives comparing mRNA-1283 with mRNA-1273 were non-inferior rVE to prevent a first event of COVID-19 from 14 days after study injection to the end of follow-up (assessed in the per-protocol set for efficacy, with non-inferiority declared when the lower bound of the α-adjusted two-sided CI for rVE was greater than –10%), non-inferior immunogenicity at day 29 (assessed in the per-protocol immunogenicity subset, with non-inferiority declared when the lower bounds of the CIs for the geometric mean concentration ratios [GMRs] of neutralising antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 D614G and omicron BA.4/BA.5 were >0·667 and the lower bounds of the 95% CI seroresponse rate differences for the two variants were greater than –10%), and safety (assessed in the safety set, which included all participants who received a vaccination). The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05815498) and is complete. Findings: Between March 28 and Aug 23, 2023, we screened 13 054 individuals for eligibility and randomly allocated 11 454 participants (5728 to mRNA-1283 and 5726 to mRNA-1273). 1177 confirmed COVID-19 events occurred up to Jan 31, 2024 (560 [9·9%] of 5679 in mRNA1283.222 and 617 [10·8%] of 5687 in mRNA-1273.222). The median age of participants at enrolment was 56 years (IQR 38–66). Of the 11 417 participants who received a vaccine, 6200 (54·3%) were female and 5217 (45·7%) were male; 9381 (82·2%) were White; and 1510 (13·2%) were Hispanic or Latino. Of the total cohort, 992 (8·7%) participants were aged 12–17 years, 7151 (62·6%) were aged 18–64 years, and 3274 (28·7%) were 65 years and older; in addition, 6857 participants (60·1%) were 50 years and older. The rVE point estimate was 9·3% (99·4% CI –6·6 to 22·8; p=0·0005). The GMR was 1·3 (95% CI 1·2 to 1·5) for BA.4/BA.5 and 1·2 (1·1 to 1·4) for D614G. The day-29 seroresponse rate difference was 14·4% (95% CI 9·3 to 19·4) for BA.4/BA.5 and 10·7% (6·0 to 15·4) for D614G. Local and systemic adverse reactions were similar between mRNA-1283 and mRNA-1273; mRNA-1283 was associated with fewer injection-site pain reactions than mRNA-1273 (3905 [68·5%] of 5701 vs 4419 [77·5%] of 5705, respectively). The frequency of unsolicited adverse events, serious adverse events, and medically attended adverse events were similar between groups during the first 28 days after injection. One event of sudden death occurred in a participant with underlying cardiovascular disease in the mRNA-1273 group; it was reported as related to vaccination due to its temporal association. Interpretation: mRNA-1283 was well-tolerated. The rVE and immunogenicity non-inferiority criteria were met, with higher antibody responses for mRNA-1283 versus mRNA-1273. The potential clinical benefit of mRNA-1283 versus mRNA-1273 needs to be confirmed in post-marketing evaluation. Funding: Moderna.

Text
PIIS1473309925002361 - Proof
Download (1MB)

More information

Published date: 7 July 2025
Additional Information: Publisher Copyright: © 2025 Elsevier Ltd

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 504630
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/504630
ISSN: 1473-3099
PURE UUID: e6f55220-b284-4fad-b898-765123a3b07e
ORCID for Jing Feng: ORCID iD orcid.org/0009-0008-6553-6443
ORCID for Saul N. Faust: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3410-7642

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 16 Sep 2025 17:02
Last modified: 17 Sep 2025 01:42

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Spyros Chalkias
Author: Patrick Dennis
Author: Dena Petersen
Author: Krishnakumar Radhakrishnan
Author: Leroy Vaughan
Author: Reem Handforth
Author: Alexandra Rossi
Author: Rahnuma Wahid
Author: Darin K. Edwards
Author: Jing Feng ORCID iD
Author: Weiping Deng
Author: Honghong Zhou
Author: Elizabeth De Windt
Author: Veronica Urdaneta
Author: Yamuna Paila
Author: Bethany Girard
Author: Saul N. Faust ORCID iD
Author: Stephen R. Walsh
Author: Catherine A. Cosgrove
Author: Jacqueline Miller
Author: Rituparna Das

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×