Are judgments of semantic relatedness systematically impaired in Alzheimer's disease?
Are judgments of semantic relatedness systematically impaired in Alzheimer's disease?
We employed a triadic comparison task in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and healthy controls to contrast (a) multidimensional scaling (MDS) and accuracy-based assessments of semantic memory, and (b) degraded-store versus degraded-access accounts of semantic impairment in Alzheimer's disease (AD). Similar to other studies using triadic comparison tasks, participants were asked to indicate which two out of three words (animal names) were most similar in meaning. Novel to this investigation, we contrasted performance on two semantic dimensions of strong and equal saliency to controls, but varying in their specificity (land/water versus bird/non-bird). Degraded-store accounts predict that the more specific bird/non-bird dimension should be more consistently impaired in AD, whereas degraded-access accounts predict that both dimensions, because they are equally salient, should be equivalently impaired in the disorder. The MDS results suggested that both patient and control group responses were not discriminable from random responding, consistent with previous studies. By contrast an accuracy-based analysis on the same data showed that controls showed good knowledge of both salient dimensions, and were evenly split in their individual preference for one dimension over another. In contrast, patients showed higher accuracy and sensitivity to the broader land/water dimension than to the more specific bird/non-bird dimension, consistent with a storage-based account of the semantic impairment in AD. Our results further suggest that MDS methods can fail to reveal important and systematic behaviour in semantic tasks, in both patient and control groups.
3084-3094
Hornberger, M
a48c1c63-422a-4c11-9a51-c7be0aa3026d
Bell, B
74cdb23e-5474-431d-952c-96e87392987a
Graham, KS
44d7b338-977b-4852-af0e-ba230524c1bd
Rogers, TT
09effe83-adaa-42d9-82cc-6447ca70866c
18 July 2009
Hornberger, M
a48c1c63-422a-4c11-9a51-c7be0aa3026d
Bell, B
74cdb23e-5474-431d-952c-96e87392987a
Graham, KS
44d7b338-977b-4852-af0e-ba230524c1bd
Rogers, TT
09effe83-adaa-42d9-82cc-6447ca70866c
Hornberger, M, Bell, B, Graham, KS and Rogers, TT
(2009)
Are judgments of semantic relatedness systematically impaired in Alzheimer's disease?
Neuropsychologia, 47 (14), .
(doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.07.006).
Abstract
We employed a triadic comparison task in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and healthy controls to contrast (a) multidimensional scaling (MDS) and accuracy-based assessments of semantic memory, and (b) degraded-store versus degraded-access accounts of semantic impairment in Alzheimer's disease (AD). Similar to other studies using triadic comparison tasks, participants were asked to indicate which two out of three words (animal names) were most similar in meaning. Novel to this investigation, we contrasted performance on two semantic dimensions of strong and equal saliency to controls, but varying in their specificity (land/water versus bird/non-bird). Degraded-store accounts predict that the more specific bird/non-bird dimension should be more consistently impaired in AD, whereas degraded-access accounts predict that both dimensions, because they are equally salient, should be equivalently impaired in the disorder. The MDS results suggested that both patient and control group responses were not discriminable from random responding, consistent with previous studies. By contrast an accuracy-based analysis on the same data showed that controls showed good knowledge of both salient dimensions, and were evenly split in their individual preference for one dimension over another. In contrast, patients showed higher accuracy and sensitivity to the broader land/water dimension than to the more specific bird/non-bird dimension, consistent with a storage-based account of the semantic impairment in AD. Our results further suggest that MDS methods can fail to reveal important and systematic behaviour in semantic tasks, in both patient and control groups.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 18 July 2009
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 504645
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/504645
ISSN: 0028-3932
PURE UUID: 0587a4b6-2483-4d7b-afd6-b7043f019b87
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 16 Sep 2025 17:07
Last modified: 17 Sep 2025 02:22
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
M Hornberger
Author:
B Bell
Author:
KS Graham
Author:
TT Rogers
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics