The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Are judgments of semantic relatedness systematically impaired in Alzheimer's disease?

Are judgments of semantic relatedness systematically impaired in Alzheimer's disease?
Are judgments of semantic relatedness systematically impaired in Alzheimer's disease?
We employed a triadic comparison task in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and healthy controls to contrast (a) multidimensional scaling (MDS) and accuracy-based assessments of semantic memory, and (b) degraded-store versus degraded-access accounts of semantic impairment in Alzheimer's disease (AD). Similar to other studies using triadic comparison tasks, participants were asked to indicate which two out of three words (animal names) were most similar in meaning. Novel to this investigation, we contrasted performance on two semantic dimensions of strong and equal saliency to controls, but varying in their specificity (land/water versus bird/non-bird). Degraded-store accounts predict that the more specific bird/non-bird dimension should be more consistently impaired in AD, whereas degraded-access accounts predict that both dimensions, because they are equally salient, should be equivalently impaired in the disorder. The MDS results suggested that both patient and control group responses were not discriminable from random responding, consistent with previous studies. By contrast an accuracy-based analysis on the same data showed that controls showed good knowledge of both salient dimensions, and were evenly split in their individual preference for one dimension over another. In contrast, patients showed higher accuracy and sensitivity to the broader land/water dimension than to the more specific bird/non-bird dimension, consistent with a storage-based account of the semantic impairment in AD. Our results further suggest that MDS methods can fail to reveal important and systematic behaviour in semantic tasks, in both patient and control groups.
0028-3932
3084-3094
Hornberger, M
a48c1c63-422a-4c11-9a51-c7be0aa3026d
Bell, B
74cdb23e-5474-431d-952c-96e87392987a
Graham, KS
44d7b338-977b-4852-af0e-ba230524c1bd
Rogers, TT
09effe83-adaa-42d9-82cc-6447ca70866c
Hornberger, M
a48c1c63-422a-4c11-9a51-c7be0aa3026d
Bell, B
74cdb23e-5474-431d-952c-96e87392987a
Graham, KS
44d7b338-977b-4852-af0e-ba230524c1bd
Rogers, TT
09effe83-adaa-42d9-82cc-6447ca70866c

Hornberger, M, Bell, B, Graham, KS and Rogers, TT (2009) Are judgments of semantic relatedness systematically impaired in Alzheimer's disease? Neuropsychologia, 47 (14), 3084-3094. (doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.07.006).

Record type: Article

Abstract

We employed a triadic comparison task in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and healthy controls to contrast (a) multidimensional scaling (MDS) and accuracy-based assessments of semantic memory, and (b) degraded-store versus degraded-access accounts of semantic impairment in Alzheimer's disease (AD). Similar to other studies using triadic comparison tasks, participants were asked to indicate which two out of three words (animal names) were most similar in meaning. Novel to this investigation, we contrasted performance on two semantic dimensions of strong and equal saliency to controls, but varying in their specificity (land/water versus bird/non-bird). Degraded-store accounts predict that the more specific bird/non-bird dimension should be more consistently impaired in AD, whereas degraded-access accounts predict that both dimensions, because they are equally salient, should be equivalently impaired in the disorder. The MDS results suggested that both patient and control group responses were not discriminable from random responding, consistent with previous studies. By contrast an accuracy-based analysis on the same data showed that controls showed good knowledge of both salient dimensions, and were evenly split in their individual preference for one dimension over another. In contrast, patients showed higher accuracy and sensitivity to the broader land/water dimension than to the more specific bird/non-bird dimension, consistent with a storage-based account of the semantic impairment in AD. Our results further suggest that MDS methods can fail to reveal important and systematic behaviour in semantic tasks, in both patient and control groups.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 18 July 2009

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 504645
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/504645
ISSN: 0028-3932
PURE UUID: 0587a4b6-2483-4d7b-afd6-b7043f019b87
ORCID for M Hornberger: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-2214-3788

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 16 Sep 2025 17:07
Last modified: 17 Sep 2025 02:22

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: M Hornberger ORCID iD
Author: B Bell
Author: KS Graham
Author: TT Rogers

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×