The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Clinical staging and disease progression in frontotemporal dementia.

Clinical staging and disease progression in frontotemporal dementia.
Clinical staging and disease progression in frontotemporal dementia.
Objective: We aimed to develop a novel tool capable of staging disease severity in frontotemporal dementia (FTD) based upon functional dependence and behavioral changes, and to assess change over time in the 3 main FTD variants (behavioral variant FTD [bvFTD]; progressive nonfluent aphasia [PNFA]; and semantic dementia [SemD]).
Methods: The Frontotemporal Dementia Rating Scale (FRS) was developed in a validation cohort of 77 consecutive clinic attendees (bvFTD = 29; PNFA = 20; SemD = 28) and applied to an independent sample of 75 patients (bvFTD = 28; PNFA = 21; SemD = 26) to establish intergroup differences. Assessments from 42 patients followed up after 12 months were used to determine annual progression. Finally, a combined sample (n = 152) was used to determine length of symptoms in each severity category.
Results: Six severity stages were identified and operationalized based upon a 30-item questionnaire (very mild to profound). The cross-sectional study revealed much greater levels of impairment in bvFTD than in the language variants, with limited correlation with general cognitive measures. Patients with SemD showed the closest association between length of symptoms and stage, taking, on average, 10 years to reach the severe stage. Patients with bvFTD appear to move most quickly between stages and patients with PNFA were intermediate. The FRS was capable of detecting functional deterioration in all 3 variants over 12 months.
Conclusions: Disease progression differs across frontotemporal dementia (FTD) variants. Patients with behavioral variant FTD progress rapidly whereas those with semantic dementia progress more slowly. The Frontotemporal Dementia Rating Scale can aid in staging and determining disease progression. Length of symptoms and global cognitive assessments alone do not reflect disease severity and progression in FTD.
0028-3878
1591-1597
Mioshi, E
5310242a-e90b-476d-a02d-51f13f973c8e
Hsieh, S
7ef9f6f5-4102-488e-bb3c-15ee71d67689
Savage, S
a20d54f8-399a-4b00-b580-7fbdf7039f8e
Hornberger, M
a48c1c63-422a-4c11-9a51-c7be0aa3026d
JR, Hodges
a3e2b3a1-3819-4f58-928d-2aae3d7a3d21
Mioshi, E
5310242a-e90b-476d-a02d-51f13f973c8e
Hsieh, S
7ef9f6f5-4102-488e-bb3c-15ee71d67689
Savage, S
a20d54f8-399a-4b00-b580-7fbdf7039f8e
Hornberger, M
a48c1c63-422a-4c11-9a51-c7be0aa3026d
JR, Hodges
a3e2b3a1-3819-4f58-928d-2aae3d7a3d21

Mioshi, E, Hsieh, S, Savage, S, Hornberger, M and JR, Hodges (2010) Clinical staging and disease progression in frontotemporal dementia. Neurology, 74 (20), 1591-1597. (doi:10.1212/wnl.0b013e3181e04070).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Objective: We aimed to develop a novel tool capable of staging disease severity in frontotemporal dementia (FTD) based upon functional dependence and behavioral changes, and to assess change over time in the 3 main FTD variants (behavioral variant FTD [bvFTD]; progressive nonfluent aphasia [PNFA]; and semantic dementia [SemD]).
Methods: The Frontotemporal Dementia Rating Scale (FRS) was developed in a validation cohort of 77 consecutive clinic attendees (bvFTD = 29; PNFA = 20; SemD = 28) and applied to an independent sample of 75 patients (bvFTD = 28; PNFA = 21; SemD = 26) to establish intergroup differences. Assessments from 42 patients followed up after 12 months were used to determine annual progression. Finally, a combined sample (n = 152) was used to determine length of symptoms in each severity category.
Results: Six severity stages were identified and operationalized based upon a 30-item questionnaire (very mild to profound). The cross-sectional study revealed much greater levels of impairment in bvFTD than in the language variants, with limited correlation with general cognitive measures. Patients with SemD showed the closest association between length of symptoms and stage, taking, on average, 10 years to reach the severe stage. Patients with bvFTD appear to move most quickly between stages and patients with PNFA were intermediate. The FRS was capable of detecting functional deterioration in all 3 variants over 12 months.
Conclusions: Disease progression differs across frontotemporal dementia (FTD) variants. Patients with behavioral variant FTD progress rapidly whereas those with semantic dementia progress more slowly. The Frontotemporal Dementia Rating Scale can aid in staging and determining disease progression. Length of symptoms and global cognitive assessments alone do not reflect disease severity and progression in FTD.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 18 May 2010

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 504646
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/504646
ISSN: 0028-3878
PURE UUID: bef0568f-0424-4d0b-9cab-2a3d1b76c3f0
ORCID for M Hornberger: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-2214-3788

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 16 Sep 2025 17:07
Last modified: 17 Sep 2025 02:22

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: E Mioshi
Author: S Hsieh
Author: S Savage
Author: M Hornberger ORCID iD
Author: Hodges JR

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×