The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

ERP correlates of retrieval orientation: direct versus indirect memory tasks

ERP correlates of retrieval orientation: direct versus indirect memory tasks
ERP correlates of retrieval orientation: direct versus indirect memory tasks
The neural correlates of the processes involved in cueing memory retrieval were investigated using ERPs to unstudied (new) items in a yes/no recognition test (direct memory task) and a semantic judgement task (indirect memory task). Subjects encoded either pictures or auditory words and were tested on visual words. We replicated previous findings that ERPs to correct rejections of new items in a yes/no recognition test differ according to the study material, with ERPs to words encoded as pictures being more negative (relative to a average mastoid reference) than words encoded auditorily [Hornberger, M., Morcom, A.M., et al., 2004. Neural correlates of retrieval orientation: effects of study-test similarity. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 16 (7), 1196–1210]. This difference was sustained from approximately 450–1200 ms. An effect of study material on the ERP to new items was found in the indirect memory task but was both earlier onsetting and shorter lived, ca. 250–600 ms. These findings add weight to the concept of ‘retrieval orientation’ [Rugg, M.D., Wilding, E.L., 2000. Retrieval processing and episodic memory. Trends Cogn. Sci. 4 (3) 108–115] – differential processing of retrieval cues according to the form of the sought-for information – by showing that a putative ERP correlate of retrieval orientation is restricted to direct memory tasks.
0006-8993
124-136
Hornberger, M
a48c1c63-422a-4c11-9a51-c7be0aa3026d
Rugg, MD
1c1825c9-e477-4d6d-8948-70839f2beedf
Henson, RNA
77d1f9d2-0833-4549-8a6d-e514bf07d8b9
Hornberger, M
a48c1c63-422a-4c11-9a51-c7be0aa3026d
Rugg, MD
1c1825c9-e477-4d6d-8948-70839f2beedf
Henson, RNA
77d1f9d2-0833-4549-8a6d-e514bf07d8b9

Hornberger, M, Rugg, MD and Henson, RNA (2006) ERP correlates of retrieval orientation: direct versus indirect memory tasks. Brain Research, 1071 (1), 124-136. (doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2005.11.092).

Record type: Article

Abstract

The neural correlates of the processes involved in cueing memory retrieval were investigated using ERPs to unstudied (new) items in a yes/no recognition test (direct memory task) and a semantic judgement task (indirect memory task). Subjects encoded either pictures or auditory words and were tested on visual words. We replicated previous findings that ERPs to correct rejections of new items in a yes/no recognition test differ according to the study material, with ERPs to words encoded as pictures being more negative (relative to a average mastoid reference) than words encoded auditorily [Hornberger, M., Morcom, A.M., et al., 2004. Neural correlates of retrieval orientation: effects of study-test similarity. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 16 (7), 1196–1210]. This difference was sustained from approximately 450–1200 ms. An effect of study material on the ERP to new items was found in the indirect memory task but was both earlier onsetting and shorter lived, ca. 250–600 ms. These findings add weight to the concept of ‘retrieval orientation’ [Rugg, M.D., Wilding, E.L., 2000. Retrieval processing and episodic memory. Trends Cogn. Sci. 4 (3) 108–115] – differential processing of retrieval cues according to the form of the sought-for information – by showing that a putative ERP correlate of retrieval orientation is restricted to direct memory tasks.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 10 January 2006

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 504647
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/504647
ISSN: 0006-8993
PURE UUID: a7e586cf-d9f4-4966-b032-e42ae93daa43
ORCID for M Hornberger: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-2214-3788

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 16 Sep 2025 17:07
Last modified: 17 Sep 2025 02:22

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: M Hornberger ORCID iD
Author: MD Rugg
Author: RNA Henson

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×