The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Student selection and recruitment processes in the UK: Who are we missing?

Student selection and recruitment processes in the UK: Who are we missing?
Student selection and recruitment processes in the UK: Who are we missing?
Widening access to Higher Education became a priority in the UK in the 1990’s, coinciding with occupational therapy (OT) education’s transition from Diploma of the College of Occupational Therapists (DipCOT) to BSc (Hons) degree qualification (Royal College of Occupational Therapists, 2019; Ryan, 2001). Despite this, OT has made little progress in diversifying studentship and workforce populations across ethnicity, gender, socioeconomic background, and (dis)ability over several decades (Colaianni et al., 2022), with the profession continuing to struggle to dispel the image that it is for “white middle-class females” (Yates, 1996, p. 353). While Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) have a responsibility to ensure admissions processes are fair, accessible and equitable (Universities UK, 2020), there has been no published data bringing together identification and assessment of admissions criteria across all UK HEIs delivering pre-registration programmes of OT education. A cross-sectional quantitative content analysis identifying programme type, academic, professional and alternative entry criteria was conducted. The review uncovered widespread variability and absence of data, placing the burden of understanding of entry requirements on candidates. This session will seek to explore how current processes may be excluding potential students at the point of entry, thus contributing to the historical and continued lack of professional diversity.
26
European Network of Occupational Therapy in Higher Education
Mcginley, Sarah
1e7b484a-b327-4c19-8f7b-cfa0d31418b5
Hamilton, Sukh
648e7abb-53ef-4d6c-9d4e-18b905122e07
Bradley, Alexander
aa5f9032-f0f5-4196-b81e-8094bc57e685
Mcginley, Sarah
1e7b484a-b327-4c19-8f7b-cfa0d31418b5
Hamilton, Sukh
648e7abb-53ef-4d6c-9d4e-18b905122e07
Bradley, Alexander
aa5f9032-f0f5-4196-b81e-8094bc57e685

Mcginley, Sarah, Hamilton, Sukh and Bradley, Alexander (2022) Student selection and recruitment processes in the UK: Who are we missing? In Book of Abstracts: 26th ENOTHE Annual Meeting 2022. European Network of Occupational Therapy in Higher Education. p. 26 .

Record type: Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)

Abstract

Widening access to Higher Education became a priority in the UK in the 1990’s, coinciding with occupational therapy (OT) education’s transition from Diploma of the College of Occupational Therapists (DipCOT) to BSc (Hons) degree qualification (Royal College of Occupational Therapists, 2019; Ryan, 2001). Despite this, OT has made little progress in diversifying studentship and workforce populations across ethnicity, gender, socioeconomic background, and (dis)ability over several decades (Colaianni et al., 2022), with the profession continuing to struggle to dispel the image that it is for “white middle-class females” (Yates, 1996, p. 353). While Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) have a responsibility to ensure admissions processes are fair, accessible and equitable (Universities UK, 2020), there has been no published data bringing together identification and assessment of admissions criteria across all UK HEIs delivering pre-registration programmes of OT education. A cross-sectional quantitative content analysis identifying programme type, academic, professional and alternative entry criteria was conducted. The review uncovered widespread variability and absence of data, placing the burden of understanding of entry requirements on candidates. This session will seek to explore how current processes may be excluding potential students at the point of entry, thus contributing to the historical and continued lack of professional diversity.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 15 October 2022
Published date: 2022

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 504730
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/504730
PURE UUID: 2b7fe491-0449-40ab-8b13-10c47eedd82c
ORCID for Sarah Mcginley: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-8775-060X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 18 Sep 2025 16:50
Last modified: 19 Sep 2025 01:47

Export record

Contributors

Author: Sarah Mcginley ORCID iD
Author: Sukh Hamilton
Author: Alexander Bradley

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×