The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Strategic litigation impacts: Indigenous peoples’ land rights

Strategic litigation impacts: Indigenous peoples’ land rights
Strategic litigation impacts: Indigenous peoples’ land rights
The world is increasingly encroaching on indigenous peoples’ traditional lands. Around the globe, indigenous communities are forced to cede ground to state development, corporate land grabs, rising sea levels, environmental degradation, and population growth. The right to land provides the basis for access to food, housing, and development. But for indigenous peoples, traditional lands are more than this; they represent essential ties to their ancestors, their culture, and their languages. Losing their land means losing their way of life.

In recent years, indigenous groups have increasingly turned to the courts as nonlitigation tactics such as protests have failed to protect their lands from seizure and their communities from eviction. This comparative study, based on dozens of interviews in Kenya, Malaysia, and Paraguay, examines the ways indigenous communities and their advocates are using litigation in an effort to defend their rights and win compensation. In so doing, it finds a sobering reality: even when successful in court, indigenous groups rarely get their land back. They can also suffer financial loss, breakdown of community cohesion, and reprisal. But the study does find benefits of litigation, including gaining alternate lands and financial compensation, better informed courts and general populations, and community empowerment. It also reveals the importance of less quantifiable results of litigation, including official apologies, increased group cohesion, and cultural renewal.

This study―the third in a five-part series examining the impacts of strategic litigation―takes a clear-eyed view of the promises and limitations of using litigation to assert land rights. It suggests that while litigation is no panacea, it can still be a helpful tool for indigenous groups seeking to defend their culture, their livelihoods, and their traditional lands.
Open Society Foundations
Gilbert, Jeremie
a8c0d4e3-dbb8-48b4-82af-646a4763697d
Gilbert, Jeremie
a8c0d4e3-dbb8-48b4-82af-646a4763697d

Gilbert, Jeremie (2017) Strategic litigation impacts: Indigenous peoples’ land rights New York, NY. Open Society Foundations 104pp.

Record type: Monograph (Project Report)

Abstract

The world is increasingly encroaching on indigenous peoples’ traditional lands. Around the globe, indigenous communities are forced to cede ground to state development, corporate land grabs, rising sea levels, environmental degradation, and population growth. The right to land provides the basis for access to food, housing, and development. But for indigenous peoples, traditional lands are more than this; they represent essential ties to their ancestors, their culture, and their languages. Losing their land means losing their way of life.

In recent years, indigenous groups have increasingly turned to the courts as nonlitigation tactics such as protests have failed to protect their lands from seizure and their communities from eviction. This comparative study, based on dozens of interviews in Kenya, Malaysia, and Paraguay, examines the ways indigenous communities and their advocates are using litigation in an effort to defend their rights and win compensation. In so doing, it finds a sobering reality: even when successful in court, indigenous groups rarely get their land back. They can also suffer financial loss, breakdown of community cohesion, and reprisal. But the study does find benefits of litigation, including gaining alternate lands and financial compensation, better informed courts and general populations, and community empowerment. It also reveals the importance of less quantifiable results of litigation, including official apologies, increased group cohesion, and cultural renewal.

This study―the third in a five-part series examining the impacts of strategic litigation―takes a clear-eyed view of the promises and limitations of using litigation to assert land rights. It suggests that while litigation is no panacea, it can still be a helpful tool for indigenous groups seeking to defend their culture, their livelihoods, and their traditional lands.

Text
OSJI-Strategic Litigation Impacts-Lands Rights-06-13-2017[1] - Version of Record
Download (1MB)

More information

Published date: 2017

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 504852
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/504852
PURE UUID: 61e4b7a0-36ac-4e85-8668-18e903c76255
ORCID for Jeremie Gilbert: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-1377-3494

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 19 Sep 2025 16:42
Last modified: 20 Sep 2025 02:29

Export record

Contributors

Author: Jeremie Gilbert ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×