"Chiropractic is manual therapy, not talk therapy": a qualitative analysis exploring perceived barriers to remote consultations by chiropractors
"Chiropractic is manual therapy, not talk therapy": a qualitative analysis exploring perceived barriers to remote consultations by chiropractors
Background
Remote consultations (RCs) enable clinicians to continue to support patients when face-to-face appointments are not possible. Restrictions to face-to-face care during the COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated a pre-existing trend for their adoption. This is true for many health professionals including some chiropractors. Whilst most chiropractors in the UK have used RCs in some form during the pandemic, others have not. This study seeks to understand the views of chiropractors not using RCs and to explore perceived potential barriers.
Methods
A national online survey was completed by 534 registered practicing UK chiropractors on the use of RCs. Respondents had the opportunity of providing open-ended responses concerning lack of engagement in RCs during the COVID-19 pandemic. Textual responses obtained from 137 respondents were coded and analysed using thematic analysis.
Results
The use of RCs provided an opportunity for chiropractors to deliver ongoing care during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, many chiropractors expressed concern that RCs misaligned with their strong professional identity of providing ‘hands-on’ care. Some chiropractors also perceived that patients expected physical interventions during chiropractic care and thus considered a lack of demand when direct contact is not possible. In the absence of a physical examination, some chiropractors had concerns about potential misdiagnosis, and perceived lack of diagnostic information with which to guide treatment. Clinic closures and change in working environment led to practical difficulties of providing remote care for a few chiropractors.
Conclusions
The COVID-19 pandemic may have accelerated changes in the way healthcare is provided with RCs becoming more commonplace in primary healthcare provision. This paper highlights perceived barriers which may lead to reduced utilisation of RCs by chiropractors, some of which appear fundamental to their perceived identity, whilst others are likely amenable to change with training and experience.
COVID-19, Chiropractic, Humans, Musculoskeletal Manipulations, Pandemics, Remote Consultation, SARS-CoV-2
Derbyshire, Shane
dac5ddda-9e0c-4246-9f8f-0848af39a72f
Field, Jonathan
d8eac057-4e48-41ef-9c13-cfb335bf76e0
Vennik, Jane
6ee78166-5a7a-433b-87fc-018771f20b19
Sanders, Marc
bed40937-29d4-4573-9225-71ccce01a687
Newell, Dave
f1a21938-9604-4f10-aac2-bb19337a638e
25 November 2021
Derbyshire, Shane
dac5ddda-9e0c-4246-9f8f-0848af39a72f
Field, Jonathan
d8eac057-4e48-41ef-9c13-cfb335bf76e0
Vennik, Jane
6ee78166-5a7a-433b-87fc-018771f20b19
Sanders, Marc
bed40937-29d4-4573-9225-71ccce01a687
Newell, Dave
f1a21938-9604-4f10-aac2-bb19337a638e
Derbyshire, Shane, Field, Jonathan, Vennik, Jane, Sanders, Marc and Newell, Dave
(2021)
"Chiropractic is manual therapy, not talk therapy": a qualitative analysis exploring perceived barriers to remote consultations by chiropractors.
Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, 29 (1), [47].
(doi:10.1186/s12998-021-00404-2).
Abstract
Background
Remote consultations (RCs) enable clinicians to continue to support patients when face-to-face appointments are not possible. Restrictions to face-to-face care during the COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated a pre-existing trend for their adoption. This is true for many health professionals including some chiropractors. Whilst most chiropractors in the UK have used RCs in some form during the pandemic, others have not. This study seeks to understand the views of chiropractors not using RCs and to explore perceived potential barriers.
Methods
A national online survey was completed by 534 registered practicing UK chiropractors on the use of RCs. Respondents had the opportunity of providing open-ended responses concerning lack of engagement in RCs during the COVID-19 pandemic. Textual responses obtained from 137 respondents were coded and analysed using thematic analysis.
Results
The use of RCs provided an opportunity for chiropractors to deliver ongoing care during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, many chiropractors expressed concern that RCs misaligned with their strong professional identity of providing ‘hands-on’ care. Some chiropractors also perceived that patients expected physical interventions during chiropractic care and thus considered a lack of demand when direct contact is not possible. In the absence of a physical examination, some chiropractors had concerns about potential misdiagnosis, and perceived lack of diagnostic information with which to guide treatment. Clinic closures and change in working environment led to practical difficulties of providing remote care for a few chiropractors.
Conclusions
The COVID-19 pandemic may have accelerated changes in the way healthcare is provided with RCs becoming more commonplace in primary healthcare provision. This paper highlights perceived barriers which may lead to reduced utilisation of RCs by chiropractors, some of which appear fundamental to their perceived identity, whilst others are likely amenable to change with training and experience.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 25 November 2021
Additional Information:
© 2021. The Author(s).
Keywords:
COVID-19, Chiropractic, Humans, Musculoskeletal Manipulations, Pandemics, Remote Consultation, SARS-CoV-2
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 504865
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/504865
ISSN: 2045-709X
PURE UUID: c47880e9-5614-449c-9abb-d8a95e84d2f9
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 19 Sep 2025 16:48
Last modified: 20 Sep 2025 02:03
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Shane Derbyshire
Author:
Jonathan Field
Author:
Marc Sanders
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics