The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Disinhibition in frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease: A neuropsychological and behavioural investigation

Disinhibition in frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease: A neuropsychological and behavioural investigation
Disinhibition in frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease: A neuropsychological and behavioural investigation
Objective:

Cognitive tests of inhibitory control show variable results for the differential diagnosis between behavioural variant of Frontotemporal Dementia (bvFTD) and Alzheimer’s disease (AD). We compared the diagnostic accuracies of tests of inhibitory control and of a behavioural questionnaire, to distinguish bvFTD from AD.
Methods:

Three groups of participants were enrolled: 27 bvFTD patients, 25 AD patients, and 24 healthy controls. Groups were matched for gender, education, and socio-economic level. Participants underwent a comprehensive neuropsychological assessment of inhibitory control, including Hayling Test, Stroop, the Five Digits Test (FDT) and the Delay Discounting Task (DDT). Caregivers completed the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale 11th version (BIS-11).
Results:

bvFTD and AD groups showed no difference in the tasks of inhibitory control, while the caregiver questionnaire revealed that bvFTD patients were significantly more impulsive (BIS-11: bvFTD 76.1+9.5, AD 62.9+13, p < .001).
Conclusions:

Neuropsychological tests of inhibitory control failed to distinguish bvFTD from AD. On the contrary, impulsivity caregiver-completed questionnaire provided good distinction between bvFTD and AD. These results highlight the current limits of cognitive measures of inhibitory control for the differential diagnosis between bvFTD and AD, whereas questionnaire information appears more reliable and in line with clinical diagnostics.
163-171
LI, Mariano
1db8856d-1ebb-40bb-8a5c-16a649592962
O'Callaghan, C
f47ed92d-85af-42c8-b6db-3f75437f6147
HC, Guimarães
5a6300f0-bb55-4e62-b238-c85cc27f5a76
LB, Gambogi
01c16438-3a91-4ea0-bdf5-46a0480ce420
TBL, da Silva
7bb0d24f-06f4-409f-9b52-2187180ee1cd
MS, Yassuda
ffe718b0-c06f-4b96-af14-f9bbb48bf758
JS, Amaral
5bc109ae-e2fb-4d9a-acf7-ae88f91dac51
Caramelli, P
d5ed5d92-d942-4c83-ad04-3548da22c363
Hornberger, M
a48c1c63-422a-4c11-9a51-c7be0aa3026d
AL, Teixeira
b308f776-164f-425b-8bc6-84d7c9bf3052
LC, de Souza
7658b891-9276-4b8a-bbdd-62787500a9aa
LI, Mariano
1db8856d-1ebb-40bb-8a5c-16a649592962
O'Callaghan, C
f47ed92d-85af-42c8-b6db-3f75437f6147
HC, Guimarães
5a6300f0-bb55-4e62-b238-c85cc27f5a76
LB, Gambogi
01c16438-3a91-4ea0-bdf5-46a0480ce420
TBL, da Silva
7bb0d24f-06f4-409f-9b52-2187180ee1cd
MS, Yassuda
ffe718b0-c06f-4b96-af14-f9bbb48bf758
JS, Amaral
5bc109ae-e2fb-4d9a-acf7-ae88f91dac51
Caramelli, P
d5ed5d92-d942-4c83-ad04-3548da22c363
Hornberger, M
a48c1c63-422a-4c11-9a51-c7be0aa3026d
AL, Teixeira
b308f776-164f-425b-8bc6-84d7c9bf3052
LC, de Souza
7658b891-9276-4b8a-bbdd-62787500a9aa

LI, Mariano, O'Callaghan, C, HC, Guimarães, LB, Gambogi, TBL, da Silva, MS, Yassuda, JS, Amaral, Caramelli, P, Hornberger, M, AL, Teixeira and LC, de Souza (2019) Disinhibition in frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease: A neuropsychological and behavioural investigation. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 26 (2), 163-171. (doi:10.1017/s1355617719000973).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Objective:

Cognitive tests of inhibitory control show variable results for the differential diagnosis between behavioural variant of Frontotemporal Dementia (bvFTD) and Alzheimer’s disease (AD). We compared the diagnostic accuracies of tests of inhibitory control and of a behavioural questionnaire, to distinguish bvFTD from AD.
Methods:

Three groups of participants were enrolled: 27 bvFTD patients, 25 AD patients, and 24 healthy controls. Groups were matched for gender, education, and socio-economic level. Participants underwent a comprehensive neuropsychological assessment of inhibitory control, including Hayling Test, Stroop, the Five Digits Test (FDT) and the Delay Discounting Task (DDT). Caregivers completed the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale 11th version (BIS-11).
Results:

bvFTD and AD groups showed no difference in the tasks of inhibitory control, while the caregiver questionnaire revealed that bvFTD patients were significantly more impulsive (BIS-11: bvFTD 76.1+9.5, AD 62.9+13, p < .001).
Conclusions:

Neuropsychological tests of inhibitory control failed to distinguish bvFTD from AD. On the contrary, impulsivity caregiver-completed questionnaire provided good distinction between bvFTD and AD. These results highlight the current limits of cognitive measures of inhibitory control for the differential diagnosis between bvFTD and AD, whereas questionnaire information appears more reliable and in line with clinical diagnostics.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 1 September 2019

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 504873
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/504873
PURE UUID: 4291abb8-f0a4-410c-917e-ccf118217e98
ORCID for C O'Callaghan: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-1839-0591
ORCID for M Hornberger: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-2214-3788

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 19 Sep 2025 16:51
Last modified: 20 Sep 2025 02:31

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Mariano LI
Author: C O'Callaghan ORCID iD
Author: Guimarães HC
Author: Gambogi LB
Author: da Silva TBL
Author: Yassuda MS
Author: Amaral JS
Author: P Caramelli
Author: M Hornberger ORCID iD
Author: Teixeira AL
Author: de Souza LC

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×