The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Logopenic and nonfluent variants of primary progressive aphasia are differentiated by acoustic measures of speech production.

Logopenic and nonfluent variants of primary progressive aphasia are differentiated by acoustic measures of speech production.
Logopenic and nonfluent variants of primary progressive aphasia are differentiated by acoustic measures of speech production.
Differentiation of logopenic (lvPPA) and nonfluent/agrammatic (nfvPPA) variants of Primary Progressive Aphasia is important yet remains challenging since it hinges on expert based evaluation of speech and language production. In this study acoustic measures of speech in conjunction with voxel-based morphometry were used to determine the success of the measures as an adjunct to diagnosis and to explore the neural basis of apraxia of speech in nfvPPA. Forty-one patients (21 lvPPA, 20 nfvPPA) were recruited from a consecutive sample with suspected frontotemporal dementia. Patients were diagnosed using the current gold-standard of expert perceptual judgment, based on presence/absence of particular speech features during speaking tasks. Seventeen healthy age-matched adults served as controls. MRI scans were available for 11 control and 37 PPA cases; 23 of the PPA cases underwent amyloid ligand PET imaging. Measures, corresponding to perceptual features of apraxia of speech, were periods of silence during reading and relative vowel duration and intensity in polysyllable word repetition. Discriminant function analyses revealed that a measure of relative vowel duration differentiated nfvPPA cases from both control and lvPPA cases (r2 = 0.47) with 88% agreement with expert judgment of presence of apraxia of speech in nfvPPA cases. VBM analysis showed that relative vowel duration covaried with grey matter intensity in areas critical for speech motor planning and programming: precentral gyrus, supplementary motor area and inferior frontal gyrus bilaterally, only affected in the nfvPPA group. This bilateral involvement of frontal speech networks in nfvPPA potentially affects access to compensatory mechanisms involving right hemisphere homologues. Measures of silences during reading also discriminated the PPA and control groups, but did not increase predictive accuracy. Findings suggest that a measure of relative vowel duration from of a polysyllable word repetition task may be sufficient for detecting most cases of apraxia of speech and distinguishing between nfvPPA and lvPPA.
1932-6203
Ballard, K. J.
236ee0d7-808d-4995-be69-8ffc500dd84b
Savage, S.
a20d54f8-399a-4b00-b580-7fbdf7039f8e
Leyton, C. E.
a3525dbf-b7eb-45d4-98e0-d3bcf0d89bc4
Vogel, A. P.
26eb8676-2cdc-4926-ba88-5e95ec353375
Hornberger, M.
a48c1c63-422a-4c11-9a51-c7be0aa3026d
Hodges, J.
6418d05c-8dc7-4db6-8efd-1c1226332408
Ballard, K. J.
236ee0d7-808d-4995-be69-8ffc500dd84b
Savage, S.
a20d54f8-399a-4b00-b580-7fbdf7039f8e
Leyton, C. E.
a3525dbf-b7eb-45d4-98e0-d3bcf0d89bc4
Vogel, A. P.
26eb8676-2cdc-4926-ba88-5e95ec353375
Hornberger, M.
a48c1c63-422a-4c11-9a51-c7be0aa3026d
Hodges, J.
6418d05c-8dc7-4db6-8efd-1c1226332408

Ballard, K. J., Savage, S., Leyton, C. E., Vogel, A. P., Hornberger, M. and Hodges, J. (2014) Logopenic and nonfluent variants of primary progressive aphasia are differentiated by acoustic measures of speech production. PLoS ONE, [e89864]. (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0089864).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Differentiation of logopenic (lvPPA) and nonfluent/agrammatic (nfvPPA) variants of Primary Progressive Aphasia is important yet remains challenging since it hinges on expert based evaluation of speech and language production. In this study acoustic measures of speech in conjunction with voxel-based morphometry were used to determine the success of the measures as an adjunct to diagnosis and to explore the neural basis of apraxia of speech in nfvPPA. Forty-one patients (21 lvPPA, 20 nfvPPA) were recruited from a consecutive sample with suspected frontotemporal dementia. Patients were diagnosed using the current gold-standard of expert perceptual judgment, based on presence/absence of particular speech features during speaking tasks. Seventeen healthy age-matched adults served as controls. MRI scans were available for 11 control and 37 PPA cases; 23 of the PPA cases underwent amyloid ligand PET imaging. Measures, corresponding to perceptual features of apraxia of speech, were periods of silence during reading and relative vowel duration and intensity in polysyllable word repetition. Discriminant function analyses revealed that a measure of relative vowel duration differentiated nfvPPA cases from both control and lvPPA cases (r2 = 0.47) with 88% agreement with expert judgment of presence of apraxia of speech in nfvPPA cases. VBM analysis showed that relative vowel duration covaried with grey matter intensity in areas critical for speech motor planning and programming: precentral gyrus, supplementary motor area and inferior frontal gyrus bilaterally, only affected in the nfvPPA group. This bilateral involvement of frontal speech networks in nfvPPA potentially affects access to compensatory mechanisms involving right hemisphere homologues. Measures of silences during reading also discriminated the PPA and control groups, but did not increase predictive accuracy. Findings suggest that a measure of relative vowel duration from of a polysyllable word repetition task may be sufficient for detecting most cases of apraxia of speech and distinguishing between nfvPPA and lvPPA.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 28 February 2014

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 504877
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/504877
ISSN: 1932-6203
PURE UUID: 0675ebdb-0eaf-4c2e-a643-dcb84c330b06
ORCID for M. Hornberger: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-2214-3788

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 19 Sep 2025 16:52
Last modified: 20 Sep 2025 02:31

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: K. J. Ballard
Author: S. Savage
Author: C. E. Leyton
Author: A. P. Vogel
Author: M. Hornberger ORCID iD
Author: J. Hodges

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×