The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Effectiveness of interventions for preventing people with dementia exiting or getting lost

Effectiveness of interventions for preventing people with dementia exiting or getting lost
Effectiveness of interventions for preventing people with dementia exiting or getting lost
Background and Objectives
People with dementia are at risk of exiting premises unsupervised, eloping, or getting lost, potentially leading to harmful or distressing consequences. This review aimed to estimate the effectiveness of interventions for preventing people with dementia from exiting or getting lost.

Research Design and Methods
A systematic review of English sources was undertaken. Health care (EMBASE, BNI, Medline, PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, AMED, HTA, CENTRAL) and gray literature (OpenGrey) databases were searched using prespecified search terms. Additional studies were identified by hand-searching bibliographies of relevant reviews and included studies. Wide inclusion criteria were set to capture a range of intervention types. Data extraction and risk of bias assessment were completed independently by two reviewers. Methods were preregistered on PROSPERO.

Results
Individual and overall risk of bias was too high for statistical meta-analyses. A narrative synthesis was therefore performed. Twenty-five studies with 814 participants were included, investigating a range of nonpharmacological interventions aiming to prevent exiting, facilitate retrieval, educate participants, or a combination of these. Seventeen (68%) of the included studies had critical risks of internal bias to outcomes, providing no useful evidence for the effectiveness of their respective interventions. The remaining 8 (32%) studies had serious risks of bias. Narrative synthesis of results yielded no overall robust evidence for the effectiveness of any interventions.

Discussion and Implications
No evidence was found to justify the recommendation of any interventions included in this review. Future studies should focus on high-quality, controlled study designs.
0016-9013
e48–e60
Emrich-Mills, L
7e3b724f-510b-4d8a-b101-6db8bdd3c2b9
Puthusseryppady, V
2c245ba1-16d3-4d03-a825-6b1d9b47bf77
Hornberger, M
a48c1c63-422a-4c11-9a51-c7be0aa3026d
Emrich-Mills, L
7e3b724f-510b-4d8a-b101-6db8bdd3c2b9
Puthusseryppady, V
2c245ba1-16d3-4d03-a825-6b1d9b47bf77
Hornberger, M
a48c1c63-422a-4c11-9a51-c7be0aa3026d

Emrich-Mills, L, Puthusseryppady, V and Hornberger, M (2019) Effectiveness of interventions for preventing people with dementia exiting or getting lost. The Gerontologist, 61 (3), e48–e60. (doi:10.1093/geront/gnz133).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background and Objectives
People with dementia are at risk of exiting premises unsupervised, eloping, or getting lost, potentially leading to harmful or distressing consequences. This review aimed to estimate the effectiveness of interventions for preventing people with dementia from exiting or getting lost.

Research Design and Methods
A systematic review of English sources was undertaken. Health care (EMBASE, BNI, Medline, PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, AMED, HTA, CENTRAL) and gray literature (OpenGrey) databases were searched using prespecified search terms. Additional studies were identified by hand-searching bibliographies of relevant reviews and included studies. Wide inclusion criteria were set to capture a range of intervention types. Data extraction and risk of bias assessment were completed independently by two reviewers. Methods were preregistered on PROSPERO.

Results
Individual and overall risk of bias was too high for statistical meta-analyses. A narrative synthesis was therefore performed. Twenty-five studies with 814 participants were included, investigating a range of nonpharmacological interventions aiming to prevent exiting, facilitate retrieval, educate participants, or a combination of these. Seventeen (68%) of the included studies had critical risks of internal bias to outcomes, providing no useful evidence for the effectiveness of their respective interventions. The remaining 8 (32%) studies had serious risks of bias. Narrative synthesis of results yielded no overall robust evidence for the effectiveness of any interventions.

Discussion and Implications
No evidence was found to justify the recommendation of any interventions included in this review. Future studies should focus on high-quality, controlled study designs.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 31 October 2019

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 504883
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/504883
ISSN: 0016-9013
PURE UUID: 8b4eceb5-62e9-419b-8422-466b342b781a
ORCID for M Hornberger: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-2214-3788

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 19 Sep 2025 17:18
Last modified: 20 Sep 2025 02:31

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: L Emrich-Mills
Author: V Puthusseryppady
Author: M Hornberger ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×