The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Sensitivity and specificity of ventromedial prefrontal cortex tests in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia

Sensitivity and specificity of ventromedial prefrontal cortex tests in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia
Sensitivity and specificity of ventromedial prefrontal cortex tests in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia
Background
Behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) is characterized by early and substantial ventromedial prefrontal cortex (VMPFC) dysfunction. To date, however, there is no consensus regarding which tests are most sensitive and specific to assess VMPFC dysfunction in this condition.

Methods
In this study we compared the sensitivity and specificity of four common VMPFC specific tests (Mini-SEA, Go/No-Go Subtest of the Frontal Assessment Battery, Reversal-Learning Test, and Iowa Gambling Task) at first clinic presentation in two neurodegenerative cohorts (bvFTD, Alzheimer's disease) and age-matched, healthy controls.

Results
We found that the Mini-SEA, evaluating theory of mind and emotion processes, emerged as the most sensitive and specific of the VMPFC tests employed. The Mini-SEA alone successfully distinguished bvFTD and Alzheimer's disease (AD) in >82% of subjects at first presentation. Similarly, the FAB Go/No-Go and Reversal-Learning Tests also showed very good discrimination power, but to a lesser degree. The Iowa Gambling Task, one of the most common measures of VMPFC function, was the least specific of these tests.

Conclusion
Sensitivity to detect VMPFC dysfunction was high across all test employed, but specificity varied considerably. The Mini-SEA emerged as the most promising of the VMPFC-specific diagnostic tests. Clinicians should take into account the variable specificity of currently available VMPFC tests, which can complement current carer-based questionnaires and clinical evaluation to improve the diagnosis of behavioral dysfunctions due to VMPFC dysfunction.
S84-S94
Bertoux, Maxime
cd351b78-c9bc-4d36-9a29-cc365fe16c34
Funkiewiez, Aurelie
1ae4a06f-d491-4f4a-b828-345fc9ed54ca
O'Callaghan, Claire
536605c1-825e-43a5-952e-821973707751
Dubois, Bruno
b5edccfa-c5ea-4863-9437-65e23ddc76ff
Hornberger, Michael
a48c1c63-422a-4c11-9a51-c7be0aa3026d
Bertoux, Maxime
cd351b78-c9bc-4d36-9a29-cc365fe16c34
Funkiewiez, Aurelie
1ae4a06f-d491-4f4a-b828-345fc9ed54ca
O'Callaghan, Claire
536605c1-825e-43a5-952e-821973707751
Dubois, Bruno
b5edccfa-c5ea-4863-9437-65e23ddc76ff
Hornberger, Michael
a48c1c63-422a-4c11-9a51-c7be0aa3026d

Bertoux, Maxime, Funkiewiez, Aurelie, O'Callaghan, Claire, Dubois, Bruno and Hornberger, Michael (2013) Sensitivity and specificity of ventromedial prefrontal cortex tests in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia. Alzheimer's & Dementia : the Journal of the Alzheimer's Association, 9 (53), S84-S94. (doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2012.09.010).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background
Behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) is characterized by early and substantial ventromedial prefrontal cortex (VMPFC) dysfunction. To date, however, there is no consensus regarding which tests are most sensitive and specific to assess VMPFC dysfunction in this condition.

Methods
In this study we compared the sensitivity and specificity of four common VMPFC specific tests (Mini-SEA, Go/No-Go Subtest of the Frontal Assessment Battery, Reversal-Learning Test, and Iowa Gambling Task) at first clinic presentation in two neurodegenerative cohorts (bvFTD, Alzheimer's disease) and age-matched, healthy controls.

Results
We found that the Mini-SEA, evaluating theory of mind and emotion processes, emerged as the most sensitive and specific of the VMPFC tests employed. The Mini-SEA alone successfully distinguished bvFTD and Alzheimer's disease (AD) in >82% of subjects at first presentation. Similarly, the FAB Go/No-Go and Reversal-Learning Tests also showed very good discrimination power, but to a lesser degree. The Iowa Gambling Task, one of the most common measures of VMPFC function, was the least specific of these tests.

Conclusion
Sensitivity to detect VMPFC dysfunction was high across all test employed, but specificity varied considerably. The Mini-SEA emerged as the most promising of the VMPFC-specific diagnostic tests. Clinicians should take into account the variable specificity of currently available VMPFC tests, which can complement current carer-based questionnaires and clinical evaluation to improve the diagnosis of behavioral dysfunctions due to VMPFC dysfunction.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2013

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 504885
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/504885
PURE UUID: 484bfbc6-df46-4ae8-b6c1-6a30a2d2f715
ORCID for Michael Hornberger: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-2214-3788

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 19 Sep 2025 17:19
Last modified: 20 Sep 2025 02:31

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Maxime Bertoux
Author: Aurelie Funkiewiez
Author: Claire O'Callaghan
Author: Bruno Dubois
Author: Michael Hornberger ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×