fMRI correlates of retrieval orientation
fMRI correlates of retrieval orientation
Processes related to the cueing of memory retrieval were investigated using fMRI during a yes/no recognition memory test. Participants studied either pictures or auditory words and were subsequently tested with visual words that either corresponded to studied items (old items) or were unstudied (new items). It was expected that neural activity would differ according to the type of information participants are trying to retrieve: a manifestation of the so-called “retrieval orientation” effect. We replicated robust old/new effects in parietal, prefrontal and anterior medial temporal lobe cortices, which did not differ according to the study material. However, we did observe differential activity to test items in temporoparietal cortex and fusiform cortex as a function of the study material. More specifically, attempts to retrieve words encoded auditorily produced greater activity in auditory cortex than attempts to retrieve words encoded as pictures, whereas the converse was found in fusiform cortex. The above pattern was found for both new and old test items. These findings implicate these regions in constraining the search for specific types of encoded information and thus are in accordance with the transfer-appropriate processing framework. Further, we propose that our results can be seen as an extension of the cortical reinstatement hypothesis, in that the same material-specific cortical regions are engaged during both encoding and retrieval, and this increases the likelihood of successful recognition, or rejection, of retrieval cues in a memory test.
1425-1436
Hornberger, M
a48c1c63-422a-4c11-9a51-c7be0aa3026d
Rugg, MD
96a4235f-918d-43de-a891-4404ae8de287
Henson, RNA
77d1f9d2-0833-4549-8a6d-e514bf07d8b9
2006
Hornberger, M
a48c1c63-422a-4c11-9a51-c7be0aa3026d
Rugg, MD
96a4235f-918d-43de-a891-4404ae8de287
Henson, RNA
77d1f9d2-0833-4549-8a6d-e514bf07d8b9
Abstract
Processes related to the cueing of memory retrieval were investigated using fMRI during a yes/no recognition memory test. Participants studied either pictures or auditory words and were subsequently tested with visual words that either corresponded to studied items (old items) or were unstudied (new items). It was expected that neural activity would differ according to the type of information participants are trying to retrieve: a manifestation of the so-called “retrieval orientation” effect. We replicated robust old/new effects in parietal, prefrontal and anterior medial temporal lobe cortices, which did not differ according to the study material. However, we did observe differential activity to test items in temporoparietal cortex and fusiform cortex as a function of the study material. More specifically, attempts to retrieve words encoded auditorily produced greater activity in auditory cortex than attempts to retrieve words encoded as pictures, whereas the converse was found in fusiform cortex. The above pattern was found for both new and old test items. These findings implicate these regions in constraining the search for specific types of encoded information and thus are in accordance with the transfer-appropriate processing framework. Further, we propose that our results can be seen as an extension of the cortical reinstatement hypothesis, in that the same material-specific cortical regions are engaged during both encoding and retrieval, and this increases the likelihood of successful recognition, or rejection, of retrieval cues in a memory test.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 2006
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 504888
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/504888
ISSN: 0028-3932
PURE UUID: 162839e3-addc-4abb-bdf2-2ffcaef3792b
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 19 Sep 2025 17:19
Last modified: 20 Sep 2025 02:31
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
M Hornberger
Author:
MD Rugg
Author:
RNA Henson
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics