Insects are not ‘the new sushi’: theories of practice and the acceptance of novel foods
Insects are not ‘the new sushi’: theories of practice and the acceptance of novel foods
Food geographies have long grappled with the interplay between production and consumption. Theories of practice offer productive new ways of conceptualising the mutual implication of supply and demand in shaping food consumption, yet little work has approached the subject of novel foods from this perspective. This paper applies practice-theoretic analysis to two novel foods, aiming to demonstrate the utility of the approach for a number of substantive areas and to extend conceptual and theoretical debates within food geographies. The paper compares sushi (a novel food successfully established in the US in the 1960s) and insects (a novel ‘sustainable’ protein source for Western markets, which to date has been relatively unsuccessful). Many accounts portray sushi’s success as the result of marketing efforts and the role of a ‘gateway dish’, arguing that insects – as ‘the new sushi’ – can follow this model to achieve widespread acceptance. It is argued that sushi’s initial Western establishment was instead due to pre-existent practices ‘carried’ to a new location, where the practices’ relevant constituent elements were also present. Conversely, European food insects are not clearly assimilable within pre-existing practices; instead, integration into existing food practices has been attempted. Such efforts are demonstrably problematic.
1285-1306
House, Jonas
d12ff336-7b23-4143-8c47-2b2bc072352e
22 November 2019
House, Jonas
d12ff336-7b23-4143-8c47-2b2bc072352e
House, Jonas
(2019)
Insects are not ‘the new sushi’: theories of practice and the acceptance of novel foods.
Social & Cultural Geography, 20 (9), .
(doi:10.1080/14649365.2018.1440320).
Abstract
Food geographies have long grappled with the interplay between production and consumption. Theories of practice offer productive new ways of conceptualising the mutual implication of supply and demand in shaping food consumption, yet little work has approached the subject of novel foods from this perspective. This paper applies practice-theoretic analysis to two novel foods, aiming to demonstrate the utility of the approach for a number of substantive areas and to extend conceptual and theoretical debates within food geographies. The paper compares sushi (a novel food successfully established in the US in the 1960s) and insects (a novel ‘sustainable’ protein source for Western markets, which to date has been relatively unsuccessful). Many accounts portray sushi’s success as the result of marketing efforts and the role of a ‘gateway dish’, arguing that insects – as ‘the new sushi’ – can follow this model to achieve widespread acceptance. It is argued that sushi’s initial Western establishment was instead due to pre-existent practices ‘carried’ to a new location, where the practices’ relevant constituent elements were also present. Conversely, European food insects are not clearly assimilable within pre-existing practices; instead, integration into existing food practices has been attempted. Such efforts are demonstrably problematic.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 22 November 2019
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 504896
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/504896
ISSN: 1464-9365
PURE UUID: 5e55fea9-d2e2-4632-a3da-8307d7617db2
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 22 Sep 2025 16:39
Last modified: 23 Sep 2025 02:22
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Jonas House
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics