The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Technology used to recognize activities of daily living in community-dwelling older adults

Technology used to recognize activities of daily living in community-dwelling older adults
Technology used to recognize activities of daily living in community-dwelling older adults
The use of technology has been suggested as a means of allowing continued autonomous living for older adults, while reducing the burden on caregivers and aiding decision-making relating to healthcare. However, more clarity is needed relating to the Activities of Daily Living (ADL) recognised, and the types of technology included within current monitoring approaches. This review aims to identify these differences and highlight the current gaps in these systems. A scoping review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA-ScR, drawing on PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Articles and commercially available systems were selected if they focused on ADL recognition of older adults within their home environment. Thirty-nine ADL recognition systems were identified, nine of which were commercially available. One system incorporated environmental and wearable technology, two used only wearable technology, and 34 used only environmental technologies. Overall, 14 ADL were identified but there was variation in the specific ADL recognised by each system. Although the use of technology to monitor ADL of older adults is becoming more prevalent, there is a large variation in the ADL recognised, how ADL are defined, and the types of technology used within monitoring systems. Key stakeholders, such as older adults and healthcare workers, should be consulted in future work to ensure that future developments are functional and useable.
1660-4601
Camp, Nicola
9dcf59fe-47c4-43db-bb6a-333721427eb9
Lewis, Martin
10cee93d-c508-4cb4-9228-a741236c04e5
Hunter, Kirsty
91861278-241c-41ad-9aae-189d8939f695
Johnston, Julie
29d96b8a-6022-404a-b5cf-8078e817b1db
Zecca, Massimiliano
870c8b27-684b-42b3-baed-40dd996c2800
Nuovo, Alessandro Di
09c7ba20-f9a1-484f-ab3a-337d83737c46
Magistro, Daniele
ab9296bc-fda6-469e-a3f8-3a574faa1b7e
Camp, Nicola
9dcf59fe-47c4-43db-bb6a-333721427eb9
Lewis, Martin
10cee93d-c508-4cb4-9228-a741236c04e5
Hunter, Kirsty
91861278-241c-41ad-9aae-189d8939f695
Johnston, Julie
29d96b8a-6022-404a-b5cf-8078e817b1db
Zecca, Massimiliano
870c8b27-684b-42b3-baed-40dd996c2800
Nuovo, Alessandro Di
09c7ba20-f9a1-484f-ab3a-337d83737c46
Magistro, Daniele
ab9296bc-fda6-469e-a3f8-3a574faa1b7e

Camp, Nicola, Lewis, Martin, Hunter, Kirsty, Johnston, Julie, Zecca, Massimiliano, Nuovo, Alessandro Di and Magistro, Daniele (2020) Technology used to recognize activities of daily living in community-dwelling older adults. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18 (1), [163]. (doi:10.3390/ijerph18010163).

Record type: Article

Abstract

The use of technology has been suggested as a means of allowing continued autonomous living for older adults, while reducing the burden on caregivers and aiding decision-making relating to healthcare. However, more clarity is needed relating to the Activities of Daily Living (ADL) recognised, and the types of technology included within current monitoring approaches. This review aims to identify these differences and highlight the current gaps in these systems. A scoping review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA-ScR, drawing on PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Articles and commercially available systems were selected if they focused on ADL recognition of older adults within their home environment. Thirty-nine ADL recognition systems were identified, nine of which were commercially available. One system incorporated environmental and wearable technology, two used only wearable technology, and 34 used only environmental technologies. Overall, 14 ADL were identified but there was variation in the specific ADL recognised by each system. Although the use of technology to monitor ADL of older adults is becoming more prevalent, there is a large variation in the ADL recognised, how ADL are defined, and the types of technology used within monitoring systems. Key stakeholders, such as older adults and healthcare workers, should be consulted in future work to ensure that future developments are functional and useable.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 28 December 2020

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 504940
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/504940
ISSN: 1660-4601
PURE UUID: 65158fe9-b9d8-48b9-b74c-bbe9e3d5fae1
ORCID for Daniele Magistro: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-2554-3701

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 22 Sep 2025 17:03
Last modified: 23 Sep 2025 02:22

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Nicola Camp
Author: Martin Lewis
Author: Kirsty Hunter
Author: Julie Johnston
Author: Massimiliano Zecca
Author: Alessandro Di Nuovo
Author: Daniele Magistro ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×