The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

The colorectal liver metastasis growth pattern phenotype is not dependent on genotype

The colorectal liver metastasis growth pattern phenotype is not dependent on genotype
The colorectal liver metastasis growth pattern phenotype is not dependent on genotype
Background: the histopathological growth patterns (HGPs) of colorectal cancer liver metastases broadly classify patients into two groups post-liver metastasectomy, with encapsulated HGP indicating a more favourable prognosis. The potential association between HGPs and specific mutations is poorly understood.

Methods: using next-generation sequencing data of 461 resected patients (104 patients with encapsulated versus 357 patients with non-encapsulated HGP), 19 putative colorectal cancer driver genes, tumour mutational burden (TMB), and microsatellite instability (MSI) or POLE mediated hypermutation were compared.

Results: most putative drivers, including KRAS (q = 0.89), NRAS (q = 0.98),) and BRAF (q = 0.97)), were not associated with HGP. However, mutations in B2M and PTEN were associated with a encapsulated phenotype (7% vs. 0%, q = 0.001, and 9% vs. 2%, q = 0.02, respectively). TMB was higher in encapsulated patients (median 5.8 vs. 5.1 mutations per megabase, p = 0.009). Multivariable overall survival analysis corrected for genetic and patient factors confirmed that the encapsulated phenotype was an independent prognostic factor (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.60; 95% confidence interval: 0.36–0.99). Upon stratified analysis, all identified genetic associations were equivocal between the cohorts.

Conclusions: while an association between genetic drivers of adaptive immune responses seems probable and could explain a minority of encapsulated patients, these results primarily demonstrate that HGP phenotype is independent of the tumour genotype.
0007-0920
Höppener, Diederik J.
b787e190-23e3-4f49-8808-3ff99ab0955b
Verheul, Sanne M.L.
19c63348-75dd-4b6a-9566-242b9df23571
Nierop, Pieter M.H.
7ad6976f-021b-40e3-81df-9fca6df048a4
Buisman, Florian E.
f90921b6-f644-402b-8777-06e81e133fc8
Galjart, Boris
c47f6621-ccc2-43d3-bcaa-44349848f859
Wilting, Saskia M.
576b0086-f239-419b-8e87-b2964ed854fe
Pugh, Siân A.
e0d0bdb3-f772-48b2-84bd-fb25045bef94
Richman, Susan D.
94db2308-e7d0-49ce-b4ae-a106849fe93e
Balachandran, Vinod P.
848c3987-36bb-422a-8f85-d51804491fb9
Jarnagin, William R.
a1485829-5538-4192-b3f8-6ca4310b9fa1
Kingham, T. Peter
b6c0cd2a-5fca-4f90-befc-065af5a57bc2
Vermeulen, Peter B.
e62f65dc-c004-4fcd-bedb-ec07a6f3326e
Shia, Jinru
147463e0-d36c-48e4-979f-b26edaeb5f93
Quirke, Philip
e0a608ee-6f6a-4972-b7ff-2e94780fcc56
Bridgewater, John A.
22a97d4c-b9df-4f88-b413-d3193d2d14b7
Maughan, Timothy S.
fb224abb-9c96-44d2-ad18-464c74271955
Groot Koerkamp, Bas
8a211ef1-d18f-4ec1-a2ec-f92f2e3c7953
Grünhagen, Dirk J.
1d52500a-cb07-4354-9831-016b30f59260
Verhoef, Cornelis
d4549415-5b8e-47cb-9743-50fa7d90bdcf
Primrose, John N.
d85f3b28-24c6-475f-955b-ec457a3f9185
D'Angelica, Michael I.
739516a1-097b-4f7f-9b84-d3f6933195cb
S:CORT Consortium
Höppener, Diederik J.
b787e190-23e3-4f49-8808-3ff99ab0955b
Verheul, Sanne M.L.
19c63348-75dd-4b6a-9566-242b9df23571
Nierop, Pieter M.H.
7ad6976f-021b-40e3-81df-9fca6df048a4
Buisman, Florian E.
f90921b6-f644-402b-8777-06e81e133fc8
Galjart, Boris
c47f6621-ccc2-43d3-bcaa-44349848f859
Wilting, Saskia M.
576b0086-f239-419b-8e87-b2964ed854fe
Pugh, Siân A.
e0d0bdb3-f772-48b2-84bd-fb25045bef94
Richman, Susan D.
94db2308-e7d0-49ce-b4ae-a106849fe93e
Balachandran, Vinod P.
848c3987-36bb-422a-8f85-d51804491fb9
Jarnagin, William R.
a1485829-5538-4192-b3f8-6ca4310b9fa1
Kingham, T. Peter
b6c0cd2a-5fca-4f90-befc-065af5a57bc2
Vermeulen, Peter B.
e62f65dc-c004-4fcd-bedb-ec07a6f3326e
Shia, Jinru
147463e0-d36c-48e4-979f-b26edaeb5f93
Quirke, Philip
e0a608ee-6f6a-4972-b7ff-2e94780fcc56
Bridgewater, John A.
22a97d4c-b9df-4f88-b413-d3193d2d14b7
Maughan, Timothy S.
fb224abb-9c96-44d2-ad18-464c74271955
Groot Koerkamp, Bas
8a211ef1-d18f-4ec1-a2ec-f92f2e3c7953
Grünhagen, Dirk J.
1d52500a-cb07-4354-9831-016b30f59260
Verhoef, Cornelis
d4549415-5b8e-47cb-9743-50fa7d90bdcf
Primrose, John N.
d85f3b28-24c6-475f-955b-ec457a3f9185
D'Angelica, Michael I.
739516a1-097b-4f7f-9b84-d3f6933195cb

Höppener, Diederik J., Verheul, Sanne M.L. and Nierop, Pieter M.H. , S:CORT Consortium (2025) The colorectal liver metastasis growth pattern phenotype is not dependent on genotype. British Journal of Cancer. (doi:10.1038/s41416-025-03103-4).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: the histopathological growth patterns (HGPs) of colorectal cancer liver metastases broadly classify patients into two groups post-liver metastasectomy, with encapsulated HGP indicating a more favourable prognosis. The potential association between HGPs and specific mutations is poorly understood.

Methods: using next-generation sequencing data of 461 resected patients (104 patients with encapsulated versus 357 patients with non-encapsulated HGP), 19 putative colorectal cancer driver genes, tumour mutational burden (TMB), and microsatellite instability (MSI) or POLE mediated hypermutation were compared.

Results: most putative drivers, including KRAS (q = 0.89), NRAS (q = 0.98),) and BRAF (q = 0.97)), were not associated with HGP. However, mutations in B2M and PTEN were associated with a encapsulated phenotype (7% vs. 0%, q = 0.001, and 9% vs. 2%, q = 0.02, respectively). TMB was higher in encapsulated patients (median 5.8 vs. 5.1 mutations per megabase, p = 0.009). Multivariable overall survival analysis corrected for genetic and patient factors confirmed that the encapsulated phenotype was an independent prognostic factor (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.60; 95% confidence interval: 0.36–0.99). Upon stratified analysis, all identified genetic associations were equivocal between the cohorts.

Conclusions: while an association between genetic drivers of adaptive immune responses seems probable and could explain a minority of encapsulated patients, these results primarily demonstrate that HGP phenotype is independent of the tumour genotype.

Text
s41416-025-03103-4 - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (1MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 24 June 2025
e-pub ahead of print date: 23 July 2025

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 504944
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/504944
ISSN: 0007-0920
PURE UUID: 9b21170a-afae-4b32-abae-cb6f2bd7065d
ORCID for John N. Primrose: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-2069-7605

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 22 Sep 2025 17:03
Last modified: 23 Sep 2025 01:36

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Diederik J. Höppener
Author: Sanne M.L. Verheul
Author: Pieter M.H. Nierop
Author: Florian E. Buisman
Author: Boris Galjart
Author: Saskia M. Wilting
Author: Siân A. Pugh
Author: Susan D. Richman
Author: Vinod P. Balachandran
Author: William R. Jarnagin
Author: T. Peter Kingham
Author: Peter B. Vermeulen
Author: Jinru Shia
Author: Philip Quirke
Author: John A. Bridgewater
Author: Timothy S. Maughan
Author: Bas Groot Koerkamp
Author: Dirk J. Grünhagen
Author: Cornelis Verhoef
Author: Michael I. D'Angelica
Corporate Author: S:CORT Consortium

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×