Access to general practice appointments and sustainable change: focused ethnographic case study

Abstract

Background: access to an appointment with a general practitioner is important to patients, but hard to achieve in modern general practice, with general practice delivering more consultations than ever before. Research has focused on discrete systems for managing access in general practice e.g. telephone prioritisation, and these have been demonstrated to be variably successful in managing demand.

Aim: to examine the sustainability of previous attempts to improve access to general practitioner appointments to understand if access systems previously deployed been adapted, abandoned or sustained.

Design and setting: focused ethnographic comparative case study in eight English general practices.

Method: qualitative observation, semi-structured interviews and documentary analysis, including 74 patient and 70 staff interviews.

Results: approaches to managing access are heavily focused on management of demand and general practices constantly change access systems to try and achieve this. In all the case study practices access solutions previously deployed were adapted, rather than abandoned or adopted, usually via ongoing changes or ‘persistent tinkering’. The complexity introduced by these adaptations can be confusing for patients and fuels dissatisfaction, stress and hostility. Persistent change to access systems creates unintended consequences and significant work for all involved.

Conclusions: persistent tinkering is a necessary and reasonable response to the challenges of access in general practice. In part this is because the problem is framed as one of managing demand. An alternative approach might investigate what patients want or need and consider how best this could be delivered.

More information

Identifiers

ORCID for Helen Atherton: orcid.org/0000-0002-7072-1925

Catalogue record

Export record

Altmetrics