Assessment of visually guided reaching in prodromal Alzheimer's disease: a cross-sectional study protocol.
Assessment of visually guided reaching in prodromal Alzheimer's disease: a cross-sectional study protocol.
Introduction Recent evidence has implicated the precuneus of the medial parietal lobe as one of the first brain areas to show pathological changes in Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Damage to the precuneus through focal brain injury is associated with impaired visually guided reaching, particularly for objects in peripheral vision. This raises the hypothesis that peripheral misreaching may be detectable in patients with prodromal AD. The aim of this study is to assess the frequency and severity of peripheral misreaching in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and AD.
Methods and analysis Patients presenting with amnestic MCI, mild-to-moderate AD and healthy older-adult controls will be tested (target N=24 per group). Peripheral misreaching will be assessed using two set-ups: a tablet-based task of lateral reaching and motion-tracked radial reaching (in depth). There are two versions of each task, one where participants can look directly at targets (free reaching), another wheren they must maintain central fixation (peripheral reaching). All tasks will be conducted first on their dominant, and then their non-dominant side. For each combination of task and side, a Peripheral Misreaching Index (PMI) will be calculated as the increase in absolute reaching error between free and peripheral reaching. Each patient will be classified as showing peripheral misreaching if their PMI is significantly abnormal, by comparison to control performance, on either side of space. We will then test whether the frequency of peripheral misreaching exceeds the chance level in each patient group and compare the overall severity of misreaching between groups.
Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval was provided by the National Health Service (NHS) East of England, Cambridge Central Research Ethics Committee (REC 19/EE/0170). The results of this study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at academic conferences.
AG, Mitchell
6ee6899a-87bf-4930-afe2-54f5ecca4f44
RD, McIntosh
4c62da3a-ddb1-4d64-bf19-e6aeb421d8f5
Rossit, S
f4bb1407-80f4-484a-8b15-e0356ed82bd6
Hornberger, M
a48c1c63-422a-4c11-9a51-c7be0aa3026d
Pal, S
73189e00-256d-484a-a86e-e81a00f5981d
AG, Mitchell
6ee6899a-87bf-4930-afe2-54f5ecca4f44
RD, McIntosh
4c62da3a-ddb1-4d64-bf19-e6aeb421d8f5
Rossit, S
f4bb1407-80f4-484a-8b15-e0356ed82bd6
Hornberger, M
a48c1c63-422a-4c11-9a51-c7be0aa3026d
Pal, S
73189e00-256d-484a-a86e-e81a00f5981d
AG, Mitchell, RD, McIntosh, Rossit, S, Hornberger, M and Pal, S
(2020)
Assessment of visually guided reaching in prodromal Alzheimer's disease: a cross-sectional study protocol.
BMJ Open.
(doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035021).
Abstract
Introduction Recent evidence has implicated the precuneus of the medial parietal lobe as one of the first brain areas to show pathological changes in Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Damage to the precuneus through focal brain injury is associated with impaired visually guided reaching, particularly for objects in peripheral vision. This raises the hypothesis that peripheral misreaching may be detectable in patients with prodromal AD. The aim of this study is to assess the frequency and severity of peripheral misreaching in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and AD.
Methods and analysis Patients presenting with amnestic MCI, mild-to-moderate AD and healthy older-adult controls will be tested (target N=24 per group). Peripheral misreaching will be assessed using two set-ups: a tablet-based task of lateral reaching and motion-tracked radial reaching (in depth). There are two versions of each task, one where participants can look directly at targets (free reaching), another wheren they must maintain central fixation (peripheral reaching). All tasks will be conducted first on their dominant, and then their non-dominant side. For each combination of task and side, a Peripheral Misreaching Index (PMI) will be calculated as the increase in absolute reaching error between free and peripheral reaching. Each patient will be classified as showing peripheral misreaching if their PMI is significantly abnormal, by comparison to control performance, on either side of space. We will then test whether the frequency of peripheral misreaching exceeds the chance level in each patient group and compare the overall severity of misreaching between groups.
Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval was provided by the National Health Service (NHS) East of England, Cambridge Central Research Ethics Committee (REC 19/EE/0170). The results of this study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at academic conferences.
Text
e035021.full
- Version of Record
More information
e-pub ahead of print date: 4 June 2020
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 505107
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/505107
ISSN: 2044-6055
PURE UUID: eb3f1853-0012-4087-97d3-5fdf3b75f72f
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 29 Sep 2025 17:12
Last modified: 30 Sep 2025 02:25
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Mitchell AG
Author:
McIntosh RD
Author:
S Rossit
Author:
M Hornberger
Author:
S Pal
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics