The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Feasibility and reliability of online vs in-person cognitive testing in healthy older people

Feasibility and reliability of online vs in-person cognitive testing in healthy older people
Feasibility and reliability of online vs in-person cognitive testing in healthy older people
Background
Early evidence in using online cognitive assessments show that they could offer a feasible and resource-efficient alternative to in-person clinical assessments in evaluating cognitive performance, yet there is currently little understanding about how these assessments relate to traditional, in-person cognitive tests.

Objectives
In this preliminary study, we assess the feasibility and reliability of NeurOn, a novel online cognitive assessment tool. NeurOn measures various cognitive domains including processing speed, executive functioning, spatial working memory, episodic memory, attentional control, visuospatial functioning, and spatial orientation.

Design
Thirty-two participants (mean age: 70.19) completed two testing sessions, unsupervised online and in-person, one-week apart. Participants were randomised in the order of testing appointments. For both sessions, participants completed questionnaires prior to a cognitive assessment. Test-retest reliability and concurrent validity of the online cognitive battery was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and correlational analysis, respectively. This was conducted by comparing performance in repeated tasks across testing sessions as well as with traditional, in-person cognitive tests.

Results
Global cognition in the NeurOn battery moderately validated against MoCA performance, and the battery demonstrated moderate test-retest reliability. Concurrent validity was found only between the online and paper versions of the Trail Making Test -A, as well as global cognitive performance between online and in-person testing sessions.

Conclusions
The NeurOn cognitive battery provides a promising tool for measuring cognitive performance online both longitudinally and across short retesting intervals within healthy older adults. When considering cost-effectiveness, flexible administration, and improved accessibility for wider populations, online cognitive assessments show promise for future screening of neurodegenerative diseases.
1932-6203
Morrissey, Sol
26a99a30-ef99-4436-938c-aff296ca0c89
Gillings, Rachel
3da2a5e2-91f6-48e7-90a7-b53132045a9d
Hornberger, Michael
a48c1c63-422a-4c11-9a51-c7be0aa3026d
Fernandes, Thiago P.
a2aaddfe-53a2-4889-a6e3-23e15cbe0515
Morrissey, Sol
26a99a30-ef99-4436-938c-aff296ca0c89
Fernandes, Thiago P.
a2aaddfe-53a2-4889-a6e3-23e15cbe0515
Gillings, Rachel
3da2a5e2-91f6-48e7-90a7-b53132045a9d
Hornberger, Michael
a48c1c63-422a-4c11-9a51-c7be0aa3026d

Morrissey, Sol, Gillings, Rachel and Hornberger, Michael , Fernandes, Thiago P. (ed.) (2024) Feasibility and reliability of online vs in-person cognitive testing in healthy older people. PLoS ONE. (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0309006).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background
Early evidence in using online cognitive assessments show that they could offer a feasible and resource-efficient alternative to in-person clinical assessments in evaluating cognitive performance, yet there is currently little understanding about how these assessments relate to traditional, in-person cognitive tests.

Objectives
In this preliminary study, we assess the feasibility and reliability of NeurOn, a novel online cognitive assessment tool. NeurOn measures various cognitive domains including processing speed, executive functioning, spatial working memory, episodic memory, attentional control, visuospatial functioning, and spatial orientation.

Design
Thirty-two participants (mean age: 70.19) completed two testing sessions, unsupervised online and in-person, one-week apart. Participants were randomised in the order of testing appointments. For both sessions, participants completed questionnaires prior to a cognitive assessment. Test-retest reliability and concurrent validity of the online cognitive battery was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and correlational analysis, respectively. This was conducted by comparing performance in repeated tasks across testing sessions as well as with traditional, in-person cognitive tests.

Results
Global cognition in the NeurOn battery moderately validated against MoCA performance, and the battery demonstrated moderate test-retest reliability. Concurrent validity was found only between the online and paper versions of the Trail Making Test -A, as well as global cognitive performance between online and in-person testing sessions.

Conclusions
The NeurOn cognitive battery provides a promising tool for measuring cognitive performance online both longitudinally and across short retesting intervals within healthy older adults. When considering cost-effectiveness, flexible administration, and improved accessibility for wider populations, online cognitive assessments show promise for future screening of neurodegenerative diseases.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 20 August 2024

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 505190
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/505190
ISSN: 1932-6203
PURE UUID: 253ee210-ab5f-4c51-80c7-1f3bb7895705
ORCID for Michael Hornberger: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-2214-3788

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 01 Oct 2025 16:43
Last modified: 02 Oct 2025 02:19

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Sol Morrissey
Editor: Thiago P. Fernandes
Author: Rachel Gillings
Author: Michael Hornberger ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×