The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Health professionals' beliefs and attitudes towards preconception care: a systematic review

Health professionals' beliefs and attitudes towards preconception care: a systematic review
Health professionals' beliefs and attitudes towards preconception care: a systematic review

Background: health professionals have previously identified various barriers and factors that would help facilitate preconception care services in healthcare settings. Clinically relevant preconception information and clinical practice guidelines have since been developed to aid health professionals in preconception care delivery. This systematic review aimed to (1) synthesise recent literature (past 8 years) describing health professionals' beliefs and attitudes towards preconception care services or programmes and (2) determine if the experience of health professionals providing preconception care has changed compared to literature reviews conducted more than 8 years ago.

Methods: five databases were searched between 27/01/2016 and 20/11/2024. Primary quantitative and qualitative research studies were included if they examined health professionals' beliefs and attitudes towards delivering preconception care services or programmes. Study quality was assessed using the CASP Checklist (qualitative studies) and AXIS tool (quantitative studies). Data synthesis used thematic categorisation adapted from the framework approach.

Results: twenty-seven studies were included (n = 11 qualitative, n = 14 quantitative, n = 2 mixed-methods studies). Methodological quality was generally good for qualitative studies but varied for quantitative studies. The results covered three categories: (1) addressing preconception care health literacy (i.e. lack of knowledge, awareness, training and resources), (2) clinical practicalities of preconception care (i.e. need for coordination of care and clarity on role responsibility), and (3) the role of the patient (i.e. need for public health education to support patient-led conversations).

Conclusions: little has changed regarding the barriers and facilitators to providing preconception care reported by health professionals. To improve the provision of preconception care, there is a need to co-develop professional and public preconception health education, clinical resources, and a coordinated preconception healthcare service model.

Attitude of Health Personnel, Female, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Health Literacy, Health Personnel/psychology, Humans, Preconception Care, Qualitative Research, Health professionals, Beliefs and attitudes, Systematic review, Preconception care
1472-6963
Caut, Cherie
127cdbdd-53aa-49b0-947a-a795e614f39a
Schoenaker, Danielle
84b96b87-4070-45a5-9777-5a1e4e45e818
McIntyre, Erica
4ca0660d-5b4f-43ee-b384-e75c56a768b7
Steel, Amie
947b68e3-582e-4040-b2c0-1927f0d30932
Caut, Cherie
127cdbdd-53aa-49b0-947a-a795e614f39a
Schoenaker, Danielle
84b96b87-4070-45a5-9777-5a1e4e45e818
McIntyre, Erica
4ca0660d-5b4f-43ee-b384-e75c56a768b7
Steel, Amie
947b68e3-582e-4040-b2c0-1927f0d30932

Caut, Cherie, Schoenaker, Danielle, McIntyre, Erica and Steel, Amie (2025) Health professionals' beliefs and attitudes towards preconception care: a systematic review. BMC Health Services Research, 25 (1), [1023]. (doi:10.1186/s12913-025-13246-y).

Record type: Review

Abstract

Background: health professionals have previously identified various barriers and factors that would help facilitate preconception care services in healthcare settings. Clinically relevant preconception information and clinical practice guidelines have since been developed to aid health professionals in preconception care delivery. This systematic review aimed to (1) synthesise recent literature (past 8 years) describing health professionals' beliefs and attitudes towards preconception care services or programmes and (2) determine if the experience of health professionals providing preconception care has changed compared to literature reviews conducted more than 8 years ago.

Methods: five databases were searched between 27/01/2016 and 20/11/2024. Primary quantitative and qualitative research studies were included if they examined health professionals' beliefs and attitudes towards delivering preconception care services or programmes. Study quality was assessed using the CASP Checklist (qualitative studies) and AXIS tool (quantitative studies). Data synthesis used thematic categorisation adapted from the framework approach.

Results: twenty-seven studies were included (n = 11 qualitative, n = 14 quantitative, n = 2 mixed-methods studies). Methodological quality was generally good for qualitative studies but varied for quantitative studies. The results covered three categories: (1) addressing preconception care health literacy (i.e. lack of knowledge, awareness, training and resources), (2) clinical practicalities of preconception care (i.e. need for coordination of care and clarity on role responsibility), and (3) the role of the patient (i.e. need for public health education to support patient-led conversations).

Conclusions: little has changed regarding the barriers and facilitators to providing preconception care reported by health professionals. To improve the provision of preconception care, there is a need to co-develop professional and public preconception health education, clinical resources, and a coordinated preconception healthcare service model.

Text
s12913-025-13246-y - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (2MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 17 July 2025
Published date: 4 August 2025
Keywords: Attitude of Health Personnel, Female, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Health Literacy, Health Personnel/psychology, Humans, Preconception Care, Qualitative Research, Health professionals, Beliefs and attitudes, Systematic review, Preconception care

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 505198
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/505198
ISSN: 1472-6963
PURE UUID: 7fe5a885-6946-49e7-af8f-796e841b9b75
ORCID for Danielle Schoenaker: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-7652-990X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 01 Oct 2025 16:48
Last modified: 02 Oct 2025 02:01

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Cherie Caut
Author: Erica McIntyre
Author: Amie Steel

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×