Health professionals' beliefs and attitudes towards preconception care: a systematic review
Health professionals' beliefs and attitudes towards preconception care: a systematic review
Background: health professionals have previously identified various barriers and factors that would help facilitate preconception care services in healthcare settings. Clinically relevant preconception information and clinical practice guidelines have since been developed to aid health professionals in preconception care delivery. This systematic review aimed to (1) synthesise recent literature (past 8 years) describing health professionals' beliefs and attitudes towards preconception care services or programmes and (2) determine if the experience of health professionals providing preconception care has changed compared to literature reviews conducted more than 8 years ago.
Methods: five databases were searched between 27/01/2016 and 20/11/2024. Primary quantitative and qualitative research studies were included if they examined health professionals' beliefs and attitudes towards delivering preconception care services or programmes. Study quality was assessed using the CASP Checklist (qualitative studies) and AXIS tool (quantitative studies). Data synthesis used thematic categorisation adapted from the framework approach.
Results: twenty-seven studies were included (n = 11 qualitative, n = 14 quantitative, n = 2 mixed-methods studies). Methodological quality was generally good for qualitative studies but varied for quantitative studies. The results covered three categories: (1) addressing preconception care health literacy (i.e. lack of knowledge, awareness, training and resources), (2) clinical practicalities of preconception care (i.e. need for coordination of care and clarity on role responsibility), and (3) the role of the patient (i.e. need for public health education to support patient-led conversations).
Conclusions: little has changed regarding the barriers and facilitators to providing preconception care reported by health professionals. To improve the provision of preconception care, there is a need to co-develop professional and public preconception health education, clinical resources, and a coordinated preconception healthcare service model.
Attitude of Health Personnel, Female, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Health Literacy, Health Personnel/psychology, Humans, Preconception Care, Qualitative Research, Health professionals, Beliefs and attitudes, Systematic review, Preconception care
Caut, Cherie
127cdbdd-53aa-49b0-947a-a795e614f39a
Schoenaker, Danielle
84b96b87-4070-45a5-9777-5a1e4e45e818
McIntyre, Erica
4ca0660d-5b4f-43ee-b384-e75c56a768b7
Steel, Amie
947b68e3-582e-4040-b2c0-1927f0d30932
4 August 2025
Caut, Cherie
127cdbdd-53aa-49b0-947a-a795e614f39a
Schoenaker, Danielle
84b96b87-4070-45a5-9777-5a1e4e45e818
McIntyre, Erica
4ca0660d-5b4f-43ee-b384-e75c56a768b7
Steel, Amie
947b68e3-582e-4040-b2c0-1927f0d30932
Caut, Cherie, Schoenaker, Danielle, McIntyre, Erica and Steel, Amie
(2025)
Health professionals' beliefs and attitudes towards preconception care: a systematic review.
BMC Health Services Research, 25 (1), [1023].
(doi:10.1186/s12913-025-13246-y).
Abstract
Background: health professionals have previously identified various barriers and factors that would help facilitate preconception care services in healthcare settings. Clinically relevant preconception information and clinical practice guidelines have since been developed to aid health professionals in preconception care delivery. This systematic review aimed to (1) synthesise recent literature (past 8 years) describing health professionals' beliefs and attitudes towards preconception care services or programmes and (2) determine if the experience of health professionals providing preconception care has changed compared to literature reviews conducted more than 8 years ago.
Methods: five databases were searched between 27/01/2016 and 20/11/2024. Primary quantitative and qualitative research studies were included if they examined health professionals' beliefs and attitudes towards delivering preconception care services or programmes. Study quality was assessed using the CASP Checklist (qualitative studies) and AXIS tool (quantitative studies). Data synthesis used thematic categorisation adapted from the framework approach.
Results: twenty-seven studies were included (n = 11 qualitative, n = 14 quantitative, n = 2 mixed-methods studies). Methodological quality was generally good for qualitative studies but varied for quantitative studies. The results covered three categories: (1) addressing preconception care health literacy (i.e. lack of knowledge, awareness, training and resources), (2) clinical practicalities of preconception care (i.e. need for coordination of care and clarity on role responsibility), and (3) the role of the patient (i.e. need for public health education to support patient-led conversations).
Conclusions: little has changed regarding the barriers and facilitators to providing preconception care reported by health professionals. To improve the provision of preconception care, there is a need to co-develop professional and public preconception health education, clinical resources, and a coordinated preconception healthcare service model.
Text
s12913-025-13246-y
- Version of Record
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 17 July 2025
Published date: 4 August 2025
Keywords:
Attitude of Health Personnel, Female, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Health Literacy, Health Personnel/psychology, Humans, Preconception Care, Qualitative Research, Health professionals, Beliefs and attitudes, Systematic review, Preconception care
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 505198
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/505198
ISSN: 1472-6963
PURE UUID: 7fe5a885-6946-49e7-af8f-796e841b9b75
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 01 Oct 2025 16:48
Last modified: 02 Oct 2025 02:01
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Cherie Caut
Author:
Erica McIntyre
Author:
Amie Steel
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics