The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

The geography of maternal death

The geography of maternal death
The geography of maternal death

The great blot on public health administration. By 1905, the majority of deaths during pregnancy and childbirth in England and Wales were registered officially and the maternal mortality ratio (MMR) was around 420 deaths per 100000 live births. Lack of progress in reducing this mortality during the period up to the mid-1930s was a cause of great concern and indeed shame to health authorities, as indicated in the quotation above from the then Minister of Health. Awareness of this stalled progress also contributed to a wider public outrage over the poor state of maternal and infant welfare. By 2005, at least 75% of maternal deaths in the developing world went unrecorded and the estimated magnitude was 450 deaths per 100000 live births. The outcry against this modern-day disgrace has become louder since 2000, when the Millennium Declaration pledged wide-scale reductions in maternal mortality as one of eight Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) agreed by an unprecedented concord of 198 nation states. Further momentum has gathered through national and international advocacy for safe motherhood, such as through the White Ribbon Alliance5 and the Partnership for Maternal, Newborn and Child Health. The similarities between the contemporary movement to prevent maternal deaths and the lay committees set up in Britain in the 1930s to lobby for greater attention are striking in many ways. However, there are also major differences, some of which highlight bleak prospects for achieving MDG.

3-28
Cambridge University Press
Graham, Wendy
c35b33d8-899f-4cdb-ac24-9b74b9e40abd
Bell, Jacqueline
9bab2935-5bd8-48cd-9ef6-dbc8f80a5dc9
Fitzmaurice, Ann
21725931-1889-4609-ac1f-567009cfcd34
Neal, Sarah
2b63ebf7-1cf9-423d-80a2-bd99a759f784
Qomariyah, Siti Nurul
f90b70d7-0f34-45de-aa4d-4b1bab30051b
Matthews, Zoë
ebaee878-8cb8-415f-8aa1-3af2c3856f55
Graham, Wendy
c35b33d8-899f-4cdb-ac24-9b74b9e40abd
Bell, Jacqueline
9bab2935-5bd8-48cd-9ef6-dbc8f80a5dc9
Fitzmaurice, Ann
21725931-1889-4609-ac1f-567009cfcd34
Neal, Sarah
2b63ebf7-1cf9-423d-80a2-bd99a759f784
Qomariyah, Siti Nurul
f90b70d7-0f34-45de-aa4d-4b1bab30051b
Matthews, Zoë
ebaee878-8cb8-415f-8aa1-3af2c3856f55

Graham, Wendy, Bell, Jacqueline, Fitzmaurice, Ann, Neal, Sarah, Qomariyah, Siti Nurul and Matthews, Zoë (2010) The geography of maternal death. In, Maternal and Infant Deaths: Chasing Millennium Development Goals 4 and 5. Cambridge University Press, pp. 3-28. (doi:10.1017/CBO9781107784758.004).

Record type: Book Section

Abstract

The great blot on public health administration. By 1905, the majority of deaths during pregnancy and childbirth in England and Wales were registered officially and the maternal mortality ratio (MMR) was around 420 deaths per 100000 live births. Lack of progress in reducing this mortality during the period up to the mid-1930s was a cause of great concern and indeed shame to health authorities, as indicated in the quotation above from the then Minister of Health. Awareness of this stalled progress also contributed to a wider public outrage over the poor state of maternal and infant welfare. By 2005, at least 75% of maternal deaths in the developing world went unrecorded and the estimated magnitude was 450 deaths per 100000 live births. The outcry against this modern-day disgrace has become louder since 2000, when the Millennium Declaration pledged wide-scale reductions in maternal mortality as one of eight Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) agreed by an unprecedented concord of 198 nation states. Further momentum has gathered through national and international advocacy for safe motherhood, such as through the White Ribbon Alliance5 and the Partnership for Maternal, Newborn and Child Health. The similarities between the contemporary movement to prevent maternal deaths and the lay committees set up in Britain in the 1930s to lobby for greater attention are striking in many ways. However, there are also major differences, some of which highlight bleak prospects for achieving MDG.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2010
Additional Information: Publisher Copyright: © 2010 The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 505222
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/505222
PURE UUID: ab3a15d3-74cc-404b-838c-1dd67ba250c0
ORCID for Sarah Neal: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-1812-7221
ORCID for Zoë Matthews: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-1533-6618

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 02 Oct 2025 16:33
Last modified: 03 Oct 2025 01:44

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Wendy Graham
Author: Jacqueline Bell
Author: Ann Fitzmaurice
Author: Sarah Neal ORCID iD
Author: Siti Nurul Qomariyah
Author: Zoë Matthews ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×