The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Memory, confabulation, and epistemic failure

Memory, confabulation, and epistemic failure
Memory, confabulation, and epistemic failure
Mnemonic confabulation is an epistemic failure that involves memory error. In this paper, I examine an account of mnemonic confabulation offered by Sarah Robins in a number of works. In Robins’ framework, mnemonic cognitive states in general (e.g., remembering, misremembering) are individuated by three conditions: existence of the target event, matching of the representation and the target event, and an appropriate causal connection between the target event and its representation. Robins argues that when these three conditions are not met, the cognitive state in question is an instance of mnemonic confabulation. Here, I argue that this is not true. There are mnemonic cognitive states which don’t meet any of these conditions, and they are not cases of mnemonic confabulation. On a more positive note, I argue that mnemonic confabulation requires it to be a failing on behalf of either the subject or her mnemonic system that these conditions are not met.
369-378
Baysan, Umut
69cc8c93-08a0-4b88-8192-eb5a22fa82e3
Baysan, Umut
69cc8c93-08a0-4b88-8192-eb5a22fa82e3

Baysan, Umut (2018) Memory, confabulation, and epistemic failure. Logos & Episteme, 9 (4), 369-378. (doi:10.5840/logos-episteme20189430).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Mnemonic confabulation is an epistemic failure that involves memory error. In this paper, I examine an account of mnemonic confabulation offered by Sarah Robins in a number of works. In Robins’ framework, mnemonic cognitive states in general (e.g., remembering, misremembering) are individuated by three conditions: existence of the target event, matching of the representation and the target event, and an appropriate causal connection between the target event and its representation. Robins argues that when these three conditions are not met, the cognitive state in question is an instance of mnemonic confabulation. Here, I argue that this is not true. There are mnemonic cognitive states which don’t meet any of these conditions, and they are not cases of mnemonic confabulation. On a more positive note, I argue that mnemonic confabulation requires it to be a failing on behalf of either the subject or her mnemonic system that these conditions are not met.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 4 September 2018

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 505250
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/505250
PURE UUID: 3069cc3c-1d03-4e03-9fa3-8df8f6f032b7
ORCID for Umut Baysan: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-1975-0739

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 02 Oct 2025 16:53
Last modified: 03 Oct 2025 02:18

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Umut Baysan ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×