The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Why incompatibilism about mental causation is incompatible with non-reductive physicalism

Why incompatibilism about mental causation is incompatible with non-reductive physicalism
Why incompatibilism about mental causation is incompatible with non-reductive physicalism
The exclusion problem is meant to show that non-reductive physicalism leads to epiphenomenalism: if mental properties are not identical with physical properties, then they are not causally efficacious. Defenders of a difference-making account of causation suggest that the exclusion problem can be solved because mental properties can be difference-making causes of physical effects. Here, we focus on what we dub an incompatibilist implementation of this general strategy and argue against it from a non-reductive physicalist perspective. Specifically, we argue that incompatibilism undermines either the non-reductionist or the physicalist aspirations of non-reductive physicalism.
mental causation, non-reductive physicalism, causal exclusion
0020-174X
546-568
Christensen, Jonas
9079ffb2-29a7-4aef-9120-4fa7e9688dbf
Baysan, Umut
69cc8c93-08a0-4b88-8192-eb5a22fa82e3
Christensen, Jonas
9079ffb2-29a7-4aef-9120-4fa7e9688dbf
Baysan, Umut
69cc8c93-08a0-4b88-8192-eb5a22fa82e3

Christensen, Jonas and Baysan, Umut (2018) Why incompatibilism about mental causation is incompatible with non-reductive physicalism. Inquiry, 65, 546-568. (doi:10.1080/0020174X.2018.1560362).

Record type: Review

Abstract

The exclusion problem is meant to show that non-reductive physicalism leads to epiphenomenalism: if mental properties are not identical with physical properties, then they are not causally efficacious. Defenders of a difference-making account of causation suggest that the exclusion problem can be solved because mental properties can be difference-making causes of physical effects. Here, we focus on what we dub an incompatibilist implementation of this general strategy and argue against it from a non-reductive physicalist perspective. Specifically, we argue that incompatibilism undermines either the non-reductionist or the physicalist aspirations of non-reductive physicalism.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 18 December 2018
Keywords: mental causation, non-reductive physicalism, causal exclusion

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 505302
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/505302
ISSN: 0020-174X
PURE UUID: c5f36e82-de9f-4b4a-b5ee-0d8954eff544
ORCID for Umut Baysan: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-1975-0739

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 06 Oct 2025 16:48
Last modified: 07 Oct 2025 02:17

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Jonas Christensen
Author: Umut Baysan ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×