The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Rejecting epiphobia

Rejecting epiphobia
Rejecting epiphobia
Epiphenomenalism denies some or all putative cases of mental causation. The view is widely taken to be absurd: if a theory can be shown to entail epiphenomenalism, many see that as a reductio of that theory. Opponents take epiphenomenalism to be absurd because they regard the view as undermining the evident agency we have in action and precluding substantial self-knowledge. In this paper, I defend epiphenomenalism against these objections, and thus against the negative dialectical role that the view plays in philosophy of mind. I argue that nearly in all cases where a theory implies one kind of epiphenomenalism, it is an epiphenomenalism of a non-problematic kind, at least as far as issues about agency and self-knowledge are concerned. There is indeed a problematic version of epiphenomenalism, but that version is not relevant to the debates where its apparent absurdity is invoked.
epiphenomenalism, mental causation
0039-7857
2773-2791
Baysan, Umut
69cc8c93-08a0-4b88-8192-eb5a22fa82e3
Baysan, Umut
69cc8c93-08a0-4b88-8192-eb5a22fa82e3

Baysan, Umut (2020) Rejecting epiphobia. Synthese, 199, 2773-2791. (doi:10.1007/s11229-020-02911-w).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Epiphenomenalism denies some or all putative cases of mental causation. The view is widely taken to be absurd: if a theory can be shown to entail epiphenomenalism, many see that as a reductio of that theory. Opponents take epiphenomenalism to be absurd because they regard the view as undermining the evident agency we have in action and precluding substantial self-knowledge. In this paper, I defend epiphenomenalism against these objections, and thus against the negative dialectical role that the view plays in philosophy of mind. I argue that nearly in all cases where a theory implies one kind of epiphenomenalism, it is an epiphenomenalism of a non-problematic kind, at least as far as issues about agency and self-knowledge are concerned. There is indeed a problematic version of epiphenomenalism, but that version is not relevant to the debates where its apparent absurdity is invoked.

Text
s11229-020-02911-w - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (269kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 10 October 2020
Published date: 21 October 2020
Keywords: epiphenomenalism, mental causation

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 505307
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/505307
ISSN: 0039-7857
PURE UUID: 8ae2a321-d2a5-475d-b082-b9fa66bb9fb8
ORCID for Umut Baysan: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-1975-0739

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 06 Oct 2025 16:54
Last modified: 07 Oct 2025 02:17

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Umut Baysan ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×