The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Physicalism or anti-physicalism: a disjunctive account

Physicalism or anti-physicalism: a disjunctive account
Physicalism or anti-physicalism: a disjunctive account
In this paper, we make a case for the disjunctive view of phenomenal consciousness: consciousness is essentially disjunctive in being either physical or non-physical in the sense that it has both physical and non-physical possible instances. We motivate this view by showing that it undermines two well-known conceivability arguments in philosophy of mind: the zombie argument for anti-physicalism, and the anti-zombie argument for physicalism. By appealing to the disjunctive view, we argue that two hitherto unquestioned premises of these arguments are false. Furthermore, making use of the resources of this view, we formulate distinct forms of both physicalism and anti-physicalism. On these formulations, it is easy to see how physicalists and anti-physicalists can accommodate the modal intuitions of their opponents regarding zombies and anti-zombies. We conclude that these formulations of physicalism and anti-physicalism are superior to their more traditional counterparts.
0165-0106
223-239
Baysan, Umut
69cc8c93-08a0-4b88-8192-eb5a22fa82e3
Wildman, Nathan
35d05c6f-b4b2-46c8-965d-a7650ee2b11c
Baysan, Umut
69cc8c93-08a0-4b88-8192-eb5a22fa82e3
Wildman, Nathan
35d05c6f-b4b2-46c8-965d-a7650ee2b11c

Baysan, Umut and Wildman, Nathan (2022) Physicalism or anti-physicalism: a disjunctive account. Erkenntnis, 89, 223-239. (doi:10.1007/s10670-022-00530-0).

Record type: Article

Abstract

In this paper, we make a case for the disjunctive view of phenomenal consciousness: consciousness is essentially disjunctive in being either physical or non-physical in the sense that it has both physical and non-physical possible instances. We motivate this view by showing that it undermines two well-known conceivability arguments in philosophy of mind: the zombie argument for anti-physicalism, and the anti-zombie argument for physicalism. By appealing to the disjunctive view, we argue that two hitherto unquestioned premises of these arguments are false. Furthermore, making use of the resources of this view, we formulate distinct forms of both physicalism and anti-physicalism. On these formulations, it is easy to see how physicalists and anti-physicalists can accommodate the modal intuitions of their opponents regarding zombies and anti-zombies. We conclude that these formulations of physicalism and anti-physicalism are superior to their more traditional counterparts.

Text
s10670-022-00530-0 - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (821kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 19 February 2022
Published date: 20 May 2022

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 505315
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/505315
ISSN: 0165-0106
PURE UUID: 6a34823d-9ce0-4c32-9e88-7d28a30617ac
ORCID for Umut Baysan: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-1975-0739

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 07 Oct 2025 16:32
Last modified: 08 Oct 2025 02:17

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Umut Baysan ORCID iD
Author: Nathan Wildman

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×