Neuroanatomical comparison of the "word" and "picture" versions of the free and cued selective reminding test in Alzheimer's Disease
Neuroanatomical comparison of the "word" and "picture" versions of the free and cued selective reminding test in Alzheimer's Disease
Episodic memory tests with cued recall, such as the Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test (FCSRT), allow for the delineation of hippocampal and prefrontal atrophy contributions to memory performance in Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Both Word and Picture versions of the test exist but show different profiles, with the Picture version usually scoring higher across different cohorts. One possible explanation for this divergent performance between the different modality versions of the test might be that they rely on different sets of neural correlates. The current study explores this by contrasting the neural correlates of the Word and Picture versions of the FCSRT with voxel-based morphometry (VBM) in AD and healthy subjects. We predicted that the Picture version would be associated with different cortical regions than the Word version, which might be more hippocampal-centric. When comparing 35 AD patients and 34 controls, AD patients exhibited impairments on both versions of the FCSRT and both groups performed higher in the Picture version. A region of interest analysis based on prior work revealed significant correlations between free recall of either version with atrophy of the temporal pole and hippocampal regions. Thus, contrary to expectations, performance on both the Word and the Picture version of the FCSRT is associated with largely overlapping networks. Free recall is associated with hippocampal volume and might be properly considered as an indicator of hippocampal structural integrity.
589 - 600
Slachevsky, A
d3f101c3-39bc-484f-a367-e25ba6f5502f
Barraza, P
62a794d1-1502-4735-8f04-36930ee740da
Hornberger, M
a48c1c63-422a-4c11-9a51-c7be0aa3026d
Muñoz-Neira, C
911b6dc7-f34b-4cba-95a8-8bf3509ac614
Flanagan, E
954e7026-776b-4764-b6bb-3c98418c4a7c
Henríquez, F
19ef66aa-6f10-41fe-a210-0353c8b4f72f
Bravo, E
6345e0af-a729-4eb5-9f16-cfc9e9c2dfca
Farías, M
24c149c4-393c-4bd4-a7ca-f582a7cfcfed
Delgado, C
71a58e76-d0a0-457a-abfc-ffa1e755950b
Slachevsky, A
d3f101c3-39bc-484f-a367-e25ba6f5502f
Barraza, P
62a794d1-1502-4735-8f04-36930ee740da
Hornberger, M
a48c1c63-422a-4c11-9a51-c7be0aa3026d
Muñoz-Neira, C
911b6dc7-f34b-4cba-95a8-8bf3509ac614
Flanagan, E
954e7026-776b-4764-b6bb-3c98418c4a7c
Henríquez, F
19ef66aa-6f10-41fe-a210-0353c8b4f72f
Bravo, E
6345e0af-a729-4eb5-9f16-cfc9e9c2dfca
Farías, M
24c149c4-393c-4bd4-a7ca-f582a7cfcfed
Delgado, C
71a58e76-d0a0-457a-abfc-ffa1e755950b
Slachevsky, A, Barraza, P, Hornberger, M, Muñoz-Neira, C, Flanagan, E, Henríquez, F, Bravo, E, Farías, M and Delgado, C
(2017)
Neuroanatomical comparison of the "word" and "picture" versions of the free and cued selective reminding test in Alzheimer's Disease.
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease : JAD, .
(doi:10.3233/jad-160973).
Abstract
Episodic memory tests with cued recall, such as the Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test (FCSRT), allow for the delineation of hippocampal and prefrontal atrophy contributions to memory performance in Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Both Word and Picture versions of the test exist but show different profiles, with the Picture version usually scoring higher across different cohorts. One possible explanation for this divergent performance between the different modality versions of the test might be that they rely on different sets of neural correlates. The current study explores this by contrasting the neural correlates of the Word and Picture versions of the FCSRT with voxel-based morphometry (VBM) in AD and healthy subjects. We predicted that the Picture version would be associated with different cortical regions than the Word version, which might be more hippocampal-centric. When comparing 35 AD patients and 34 controls, AD patients exhibited impairments on both versions of the FCSRT and both groups performed higher in the Picture version. A region of interest analysis based on prior work revealed significant correlations between free recall of either version with atrophy of the temporal pole and hippocampal regions. Thus, contrary to expectations, performance on both the Word and the Picture version of the FCSRT is associated with largely overlapping networks. Free recall is associated with hippocampal volume and might be properly considered as an indicator of hippocampal structural integrity.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
e-pub ahead of print date: 1 December 2017
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 505338
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/505338
PURE UUID: 40e1d8d8-6e2f-4ba4-914b-47a0f9bef9ed
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 07 Oct 2025 16:37
Last modified: 08 Oct 2025 02:17
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
A Slachevsky
Author:
P Barraza
Author:
M Hornberger
Author:
C Muñoz-Neira
Author:
E Flanagan
Author:
F Henríquez
Author:
E Bravo
Author:
M Farías
Author:
C Delgado
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics