The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Reliability of online, remote neuropsychological assessment in people with and without subjective cognitive decline

Reliability of online, remote neuropsychological assessment in people with and without subjective cognitive decline
Reliability of online, remote neuropsychological assessment in people with and without subjective cognitive decline

Online, remote neuropsychological assessment paradigms may offer a cost-effective alternative to in-person assessment for people who experience subjective cognitive decline (SCD). However, it is vital to establish the psychometric properties of such paradigms. The present study (i) evaluates test-retest reliability of remote, online neuropsychological tests from the NeurOn software platform in people with and without SCD (Non-SCD) recruited from the general population; and (ii) investigates potential group differences in baseline performance and longitudinal change. Ninety-nine participants (SCD N = 44, Non-SCD N = 55) completed seven tests from the NeurOn battery, covering visual and verbal memory, working memory, attention and psychomotor speed. Sixty-nine participants (SCD N = 34, Non-SCD N = 35) repeated the assessment six (+/- one) months later. SCD was classified using the Cognitive Change Index questionnaire. Test-retest reliability of the NeurOn test outcome measures ranged from poor to good, with the strongest evidence of reliability shown for the Sustained Attention to Response Test and Picture Recognition. The SCD group was significantly older than the Non-SCD group so group differences were investigated using analysis of covariance whilst controlling for the effect of age. SCD scored significantly better than Non-SCD for Digit Span Backwards (maximum sequence length) and Picture Recognition (recall of object position) at baseline. However, these were not significant when using the Bonferroni-adjusted alpha level. There were no differences between SCD and Non-SCD in longitudinal change. The results suggest online, remote neuropsychological assessment is a promising option for assessing and monitoring SCD, however more research is needed to determine the most suitable tests in terms of reliability and sensitivity to SCD.

2767-3170
Peterson, Katie A.
62d613af-67ff-43d1-b7f4-5dd7a9492bd0
Leddy, Adrian
2fe706da-4567-4773-a16e-7649f0250779
Hornberger, Michael
a48c1c63-422a-4c11-9a51-c7be0aa3026d
Haleh Ayatollahi,
0403dea2-40b2-4127-bba6-7b2f4fac604e
Peterson, Katie A.
62d613af-67ff-43d1-b7f4-5dd7a9492bd0
Haleh Ayatollahi,
0403dea2-40b2-4127-bba6-7b2f4fac604e
Leddy, Adrian
2fe706da-4567-4773-a16e-7649f0250779
Hornberger, Michael
a48c1c63-422a-4c11-9a51-c7be0aa3026d

Peterson, Katie A., Leddy, Adrian and Hornberger, Michael , Haleh Ayatollahi, (ed.) (2025) Reliability of online, remote neuropsychological assessment in people with and without subjective cognitive decline. PLOS digital health, 4 (4), [e0000682]. (doi:10.1371/journal.pdig.0000682).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Online, remote neuropsychological assessment paradigms may offer a cost-effective alternative to in-person assessment for people who experience subjective cognitive decline (SCD). However, it is vital to establish the psychometric properties of such paradigms. The present study (i) evaluates test-retest reliability of remote, online neuropsychological tests from the NeurOn software platform in people with and without SCD (Non-SCD) recruited from the general population; and (ii) investigates potential group differences in baseline performance and longitudinal change. Ninety-nine participants (SCD N = 44, Non-SCD N = 55) completed seven tests from the NeurOn battery, covering visual and verbal memory, working memory, attention and psychomotor speed. Sixty-nine participants (SCD N = 34, Non-SCD N = 35) repeated the assessment six (+/- one) months later. SCD was classified using the Cognitive Change Index questionnaire. Test-retest reliability of the NeurOn test outcome measures ranged from poor to good, with the strongest evidence of reliability shown for the Sustained Attention to Response Test and Picture Recognition. The SCD group was significantly older than the Non-SCD group so group differences were investigated using analysis of covariance whilst controlling for the effect of age. SCD scored significantly better than Non-SCD for Digit Span Backwards (maximum sequence length) and Picture Recognition (recall of object position) at baseline. However, these were not significant when using the Bonferroni-adjusted alpha level. There were no differences between SCD and Non-SCD in longitudinal change. The results suggest online, remote neuropsychological assessment is a promising option for assessing and monitoring SCD, however more research is needed to determine the most suitable tests in terms of reliability and sensitivity to SCD.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 18 February 2025
Published date: 8 April 2025
Additional Information: Publisher Copyright: © 2025 Peterson et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 505349
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/505349
ISSN: 2767-3170
PURE UUID: d812b585-05ff-4af3-926a-9ab2b6be031e
ORCID for Michael Hornberger: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-2214-3788

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 07 Oct 2025 16:39
Last modified: 08 Oct 2025 02:17

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Katie A. Peterson
Editor: Haleh Ayatollahi
Author: Adrian Leddy
Author: Michael Hornberger ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×