The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Progression in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia: A longitudinal study

Progression in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia: A longitudinal study
Progression in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia: A longitudinal study
Importance A gap in the literature exists regarding progression in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (BVFTD). Guidance is needed concerning markers that will enable clinicians to discriminate FTD more effectively from phenocopies and to identify factors that determine progression and thereby prognosis.

Objectives To observe longitudinal outcomes and progression in probable and possible BVFTD in accordance with international diagnostic criteria and to identify features that may aid clinicians to prognosticate better in cases of possible BVFTD.

Design, Setting, and Participants Longitudinal cohort study performed in a specialist tertiary FTD research clinic. Fifty-eight consecutive patients were followed up longitudinally from January 1, 2008, through December 31, 2013, and classified as having possible, probable, or definite BVFTD at presentation and latest review. Final follow-up was completed on December 31, 2013, and data were analyzed from January 1 to August 1, 2014.

Main Outcomes and Measures Clinical, pathological, genetic, neuropsychological, and neuroimaging data were analyzed to categorize patients, to compare differences between groups with changed and unchanged diagnoses, to determine rates of progression in BVFTD, and to identify prognostic features in possible BVFTD.

Results At presentation, 38 of the 58 patients fulfilled criteria for probable BVFTD; of these, 36 continued to satisfy probable criteria or underwent conversion to definite criteria over time. The remaining 20 patients satisfied possible criteria only, and 11 of these patients changed categories over time to probable or definite BVFTD and showed progression on cognitive and functional measures (termed changed status). Of these 11 patients, 8 (73%) carried the C9orf72 expansion. A positive family history, memory impairment, and clinical abnormalities at presentation were key features of progression (P < .05). A continuum of neuropsychological scores, progression rates, and atrophy severity emerged across patients in probable, possible, changed status, and nonchanged status groups; patients with probable BVFTD exhibited the most severe abnormalities.

Conclusions and Relevance Behavioral variant FTD shows variable progression over time. Clinicians can use a detailed neurologic and cognitive assessment to identify key predictive features of progression when faced with possible BVFTD, whereas a diagnosis of probable BVFTD is accurate in a clinical setting.
2168-6149
Devenney, E
a9c98e9e-5a92-4c90-bff6-7c28b826f370
Bartley, L
af97332e-e72c-494e-b2fc-660d9d56ab5c
Hoon, C
d531802a-2824-4926-b3ae-e4a2219d15a5
O'Callaghan, C
f47ed92d-85af-42c8-b6db-3f75437f6147
Kumfor, F
0db459e4-3701-49a0-8076-d9d1f5b33efd
Hornberger, M
a48c1c63-422a-4c11-9a51-c7be0aa3026d
JB, Kwok
ef1b72ae-8c44-4c28-95d6-b021ae7969d7
GM, Halliday
9dc6456d-dae4-44a1-b37e-ee8ffbab6238
MC, Kiernan
00e2d9c6-7249-4e39-bdfd-d39ea40412bf
Piguet, O
edb4727c-9766-4217-8010-1fcd83281548
JR, Hodges
936bf0c6-b9ab-46eb-a3ed-2a6b719019aa
Devenney, E
a9c98e9e-5a92-4c90-bff6-7c28b826f370
Bartley, L
af97332e-e72c-494e-b2fc-660d9d56ab5c
Hoon, C
d531802a-2824-4926-b3ae-e4a2219d15a5
O'Callaghan, C
f47ed92d-85af-42c8-b6db-3f75437f6147
Kumfor, F
0db459e4-3701-49a0-8076-d9d1f5b33efd
Hornberger, M
a48c1c63-422a-4c11-9a51-c7be0aa3026d
JB, Kwok
ef1b72ae-8c44-4c28-95d6-b021ae7969d7
GM, Halliday
9dc6456d-dae4-44a1-b37e-ee8ffbab6238
MC, Kiernan
00e2d9c6-7249-4e39-bdfd-d39ea40412bf
Piguet, O
edb4727c-9766-4217-8010-1fcd83281548
JR, Hodges
936bf0c6-b9ab-46eb-a3ed-2a6b719019aa

Devenney, E, Bartley, L, Hoon, C, O'Callaghan, C, Kumfor, F, Hornberger, M, JB, Kwok, GM, Halliday, MC, Kiernan, Piguet, O and JR, Hodges (2015) Progression in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia: A longitudinal study. JAMA Neurology, 72 (12). (doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2015.2061).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Importance A gap in the literature exists regarding progression in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (BVFTD). Guidance is needed concerning markers that will enable clinicians to discriminate FTD more effectively from phenocopies and to identify factors that determine progression and thereby prognosis.

Objectives To observe longitudinal outcomes and progression in probable and possible BVFTD in accordance with international diagnostic criteria and to identify features that may aid clinicians to prognosticate better in cases of possible BVFTD.

Design, Setting, and Participants Longitudinal cohort study performed in a specialist tertiary FTD research clinic. Fifty-eight consecutive patients were followed up longitudinally from January 1, 2008, through December 31, 2013, and classified as having possible, probable, or definite BVFTD at presentation and latest review. Final follow-up was completed on December 31, 2013, and data were analyzed from January 1 to August 1, 2014.

Main Outcomes and Measures Clinical, pathological, genetic, neuropsychological, and neuroimaging data were analyzed to categorize patients, to compare differences between groups with changed and unchanged diagnoses, to determine rates of progression in BVFTD, and to identify prognostic features in possible BVFTD.

Results At presentation, 38 of the 58 patients fulfilled criteria for probable BVFTD; of these, 36 continued to satisfy probable criteria or underwent conversion to definite criteria over time. The remaining 20 patients satisfied possible criteria only, and 11 of these patients changed categories over time to probable or definite BVFTD and showed progression on cognitive and functional measures (termed changed status). Of these 11 patients, 8 (73%) carried the C9orf72 expansion. A positive family history, memory impairment, and clinical abnormalities at presentation were key features of progression (P < .05). A continuum of neuropsychological scores, progression rates, and atrophy severity emerged across patients in probable, possible, changed status, and nonchanged status groups; patients with probable BVFTD exhibited the most severe abnormalities.

Conclusions and Relevance Behavioral variant FTD shows variable progression over time. Clinicians can use a detailed neurologic and cognitive assessment to identify key predictive features of progression when faced with possible BVFTD, whereas a diagnosis of probable BVFTD is accurate in a clinical setting.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 2 December 2015

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 505366
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/505366
ISSN: 2168-6149
PURE UUID: 9792fbc5-fc30-48c7-a7c8-87836eaae5e6
ORCID for C O'Callaghan: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-1839-0591
ORCID for M Hornberger: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-2214-3788

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 07 Oct 2025 16:49
Last modified: 08 Oct 2025 02:17

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: E Devenney
Author: L Bartley
Author: C Hoon
Author: C O'Callaghan ORCID iD
Author: F Kumfor
Author: M Hornberger ORCID iD
Author: Kwok JB
Author: Halliday GM
Author: Kiernan MC
Author: O Piguet
Author: Hodges JR

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×