The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

The use of force against Taiwan as a contested state: an analysis of legality and great-power politics

The use of force against Taiwan as a contested state: an analysis of legality and great-power politics
The use of force against Taiwan as a contested state: an analysis of legality and great-power politics
This chapter employs a multidisciplinary approach, integrating international law and international relations (IR), to examine China’s potential use of force against Taiwan. It first explores how ambiguity and vulnerability— common to contested states facing the threat of force— apply to Taiwan. The chapter then delves deeper into the ambiguity of Taiwan’s status by examining Taiwan’s evolving sovereign features, including de jure and de facto international legal sovereignty, Westphalian sovereignty, and domestic sovereignty. It also highlights Taiwan’s unique material power, which could be advantageous in a conflict with China. From a revisionist legal perspective, it argues that Taiwan qualifies as a rights holder under international law based on self-determination, its longstanding and stable de facto regime, and China’s obligation to resolve disputes peacefully to maintain international security. The chapter also assesses third-party intervention, particularly the U.S. response, in a Taiwan contingency, through a realist IR framework grounded in great-power politics. Although the U.S. has no formal military alliance with Taiwan, its perception of China as a peer competitor increases the likelihood of intervention in a Cross-Strait conflict, although nuclear deterrence will limit the scope of U.S. involvement.
International legal sovereignty; Westphalian sovereignty; domestic sovereignty; third-party intervention; revisionist legal perspective; realist IR framework; great-power politics; nuclear deterrence; peer competitor; Taiwan contingency
42-62
Bristol University Press
Chu, Ming-chin Monique
a9f472b8-016d-48a2-927d-d9df73a0fa87
Grzybowski, Janis
Oltramonti, Giulia Prelz
Verdebout, Agatha
Chu, Ming-chin Monique
a9f472b8-016d-48a2-927d-d9df73a0fa87
Grzybowski, Janis
Oltramonti, Giulia Prelz
Verdebout, Agatha

Chu, Ming-chin Monique (2025) The use of force against Taiwan as a contested state: an analysis of legality and great-power politics. In, Grzybowski, Janis, Oltramonti, Giulia Prelz and Verdebout, Agatha (eds.) Contested States in War and Law. Bristol. Bristol University Press, pp. 42-62.

Record type: Book Section

Abstract

This chapter employs a multidisciplinary approach, integrating international law and international relations (IR), to examine China’s potential use of force against Taiwan. It first explores how ambiguity and vulnerability— common to contested states facing the threat of force— apply to Taiwan. The chapter then delves deeper into the ambiguity of Taiwan’s status by examining Taiwan’s evolving sovereign features, including de jure and de facto international legal sovereignty, Westphalian sovereignty, and domestic sovereignty. It also highlights Taiwan’s unique material power, which could be advantageous in a conflict with China. From a revisionist legal perspective, it argues that Taiwan qualifies as a rights holder under international law based on self-determination, its longstanding and stable de facto regime, and China’s obligation to resolve disputes peacefully to maintain international security. The chapter also assesses third-party intervention, particularly the U.S. response, in a Taiwan contingency, through a realist IR framework grounded in great-power politics. Although the U.S. has no formal military alliance with Taiwan, its perception of China as a peer competitor increases the likelihood of intervention in a Cross-Strait conflict, although nuclear deterrence will limit the scope of U.S. involvement.

Text
Chu-2025-The Use of Force against Taiwan as a Contested State-An Analysis of Legality and Great Power Politics - Version of Record
Download (20MB)

More information

Published date: 18 September 2025
Keywords: International legal sovereignty; Westphalian sovereignty; domestic sovereignty; third-party intervention; revisionist legal perspective; realist IR framework; great-power politics; nuclear deterrence; peer competitor; Taiwan contingency

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 505642
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/505642
PURE UUID: e70fd870-1f45-417e-b9ae-d5fdb25f56d1
ORCID for Ming-chin Monique Chu: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-6646-2310

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 15 Oct 2025 16:39
Last modified: 16 Oct 2025 01:47

Export record

Contributors

Editor: Janis Grzybowski
Editor: Giulia Prelz Oltramonti
Editor: Agatha Verdebout

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×