The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Effect on cardiovascular disease risk factors of interventions to alter consultations between practitioners and patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of trials in primary care

Effect on cardiovascular disease risk factors of interventions to alter consultations between practitioners and patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of trials in primary care
Effect on cardiovascular disease risk factors of interventions to alter consultations between practitioners and patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of trials in primary care
Objective
To examine the effect on cardiovascular (CVD) risk factors of interventions to alter consultations between practitioners and patients with type 2 diabetes.

Search Strategy
Electronic and manual citation searching to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Inclusion Criteria
RCTs that compared usual care to interventions to alter consultations between practitioners and patients. The population was adults aged over 18 years with type 2 diabetes. Trials were set in primary care.

Data extraction and synthesis
We recorded if explicit theory-based interventions were used, how consultations were measured to determine whether interventions had an effect on these and calculated weighted mean differences for CVD risk factors including glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), total cholesterol (TC), LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) and HDL cholesterol (HDL-C).

Results
We included seven RCTs with a total of 2277 patients with type 2 diabetes. A range of measures of the consultation was reported, and underlying theory to explain intervention processes was generally undeveloped and poorly applied. There were no overall effects on CVD risk factors; however, trials were heterogeneous. Subgroup analysis suggested some benefit among studies in which interventions demonstrated impact on consultations; statistically significant reductions in HbA1c levels (weighted mean difference, −0.53%; 95% CI: [−0.77, −0.28]; P<.0001; I2=46%).

Conclusions
Evidence of effect on CVD risk factors from interventions to alter consultations between practitioners and patients with type 2 diabetes was heterogeneous and inconclusive. This could be explained by variable impact of interventions on consultations. More research is required that includes robust measures of the consultations and better development of theory to elucidate mechanisms.
1369-6513
1218 - 1227
Dambha-Miller, Hajira
58961db5-31aa-460e-9394-08590c4b7ba1
Cooper, AM
10056c1b-9af2-4983-a0ef-d2629f0795d6
Kinmonth, Ann-Louise
0bf25ce1-e62c-4941-9d2b-49500dc15f1b
Griffin, Simon
82ce3f76-cd32-4125-8b46-0cae8f1e2278
Dambha-Miller, Hajira
58961db5-31aa-460e-9394-08590c4b7ba1
Cooper, AM
10056c1b-9af2-4983-a0ef-d2629f0795d6
Kinmonth, Ann-Louise
0bf25ce1-e62c-4941-9d2b-49500dc15f1b
Griffin, Simon
82ce3f76-cd32-4125-8b46-0cae8f1e2278

Dambha-Miller, Hajira, Cooper, AM, Kinmonth, Ann-Louise and Griffin, Simon (2017) Effect on cardiovascular disease risk factors of interventions to alter consultations between practitioners and patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of trials in primary care. Health Expectations, 20 (6), 1218 - 1227. (doi:10.17863/CAM.7503).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Objective
To examine the effect on cardiovascular (CVD) risk factors of interventions to alter consultations between practitioners and patients with type 2 diabetes.

Search Strategy
Electronic and manual citation searching to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Inclusion Criteria
RCTs that compared usual care to interventions to alter consultations between practitioners and patients. The population was adults aged over 18 years with type 2 diabetes. Trials were set in primary care.

Data extraction and synthesis
We recorded if explicit theory-based interventions were used, how consultations were measured to determine whether interventions had an effect on these and calculated weighted mean differences for CVD risk factors including glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), total cholesterol (TC), LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) and HDL cholesterol (HDL-C).

Results
We included seven RCTs with a total of 2277 patients with type 2 diabetes. A range of measures of the consultation was reported, and underlying theory to explain intervention processes was generally undeveloped and poorly applied. There were no overall effects on CVD risk factors; however, trials were heterogeneous. Subgroup analysis suggested some benefit among studies in which interventions demonstrated impact on consultations; statistically significant reductions in HbA1c levels (weighted mean difference, −0.53%; 95% CI: [−0.77, −0.28]; P<.0001; I2=46%).

Conclusions
Evidence of effect on CVD risk factors from interventions to alter consultations between practitioners and patients with type 2 diabetes was heterogeneous and inconclusive. This could be explained by variable impact of interventions on consultations. More research is required that includes robust measures of the consultations and better development of theory to elucidate mechanisms.

Text
Health Expectations - 2017 - Dambha‐Miller - Effect on cardiovascular disease risk factors of interventions to alter - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (709kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 25 January 2017
e-pub ahead of print date: 28 February 2017

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 505650
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/505650
ISSN: 1369-6513
PURE UUID: 66e52b34-f006-4fc4-ae64-25f1494888b5
ORCID for Hajira Dambha-Miller: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-0175-443X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 15 Oct 2025 16:41
Last modified: 18 Oct 2025 01:59

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: AM Cooper
Author: Ann-Louise Kinmonth
Author: Simon Griffin

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×