The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Comparison of Three Strategies for Buzz-Saw Noise Propagation in an Aeroengine Intake with Flow Distortion using CFD

Comparison of Three Strategies for Buzz-Saw Noise Propagation in an Aeroengine Intake with Flow Distortion using CFD
Comparison of Three Strategies for Buzz-Saw Noise Propagation in an Aeroengine Intake with Flow Distortion using CFD
The expense of computational methods that can accurately predict the tonal acoustic field in an aeroengine intake is a current limitation for understanding current and future challenges in aeroengine noise, such as the impact of increased flow distortion with UHBR (Ultra-High Bypass Ratio) turbofan designs. In this study, the intake propagation of shock-associated fan tone noise through a distorted inflow is considered. Three numerical methodologies are applied to explore novel methods for reducing the computational demand of representative and accurate calculations. The datum case considers the full intake domain with a fully structured computational mesh. A part-span approximation neglects low-span regions of the duct according to the observation that most of the interested acoustic content has energy focused towards the outer walls of the duct. Finally, a hybrid technique combines the earlier approaches by filling the previously neglected space with unstructured mesh. Both the part-span and hybrid methodologies unlock considerable computational savings. Both cases could sufficiently resolve the distorted flow field. The acoustic field at the first two Blade Passing Frequencies (BPFs) was considered for all cases. At the first BPF, both methodologies successfully represent the highest amplitude components. At the second BPF, more deviations were observed for the case that applied the part-span approximation, while the hybrid case results matched well with the datum case.
Angle of Attack, Bypass Ratio, Computational Aeroacoustics, Computational Fluid Dynamics, Discontinuous Galerkin Method, Flow Conditions, Rotor Stator Interactions, Static Pressure, Turbofan Design, Unsteady Reynolds Averaged Navier Stokes
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics
Binns, Joseph S.P.
74c676dc-458d-4afa-9957-0c14cb36a086
Wu, Long
9787473b-a81a-47ce-a696-22afa8c2204b
Wilson, Alexander G.
208d47f4-0a9d-4de3-8e45-07536862d07b
Binns, Joseph S.P.
74c676dc-458d-4afa-9957-0c14cb36a086
Wu, Long
9787473b-a81a-47ce-a696-22afa8c2204b
Wilson, Alexander G.
208d47f4-0a9d-4de3-8e45-07536862d07b

Binns, Joseph S.P., Wu, Long and Wilson, Alexander G. (2025) Comparison of Three Strategies for Buzz-Saw Noise Propagation in an Aeroengine Intake with Flow Distortion using CFD. In AIAA Aviation Forum and Ascend 2025. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. 21 pp . (doi:10.2514/6.2025-3749).

Record type: Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)

Abstract

The expense of computational methods that can accurately predict the tonal acoustic field in an aeroengine intake is a current limitation for understanding current and future challenges in aeroengine noise, such as the impact of increased flow distortion with UHBR (Ultra-High Bypass Ratio) turbofan designs. In this study, the intake propagation of shock-associated fan tone noise through a distorted inflow is considered. Three numerical methodologies are applied to explore novel methods for reducing the computational demand of representative and accurate calculations. The datum case considers the full intake domain with a fully structured computational mesh. A part-span approximation neglects low-span regions of the duct according to the observation that most of the interested acoustic content has energy focused towards the outer walls of the duct. Finally, a hybrid technique combines the earlier approaches by filling the previously neglected space with unstructured mesh. Both the part-span and hybrid methodologies unlock considerable computational savings. Both cases could sufficiently resolve the distorted flow field. The acoustic field at the first two Blade Passing Frequencies (BPFs) was considered for all cases. At the first BPF, both methodologies successfully represent the highest amplitude components. At the second BPF, more deviations were observed for the case that applied the part-span approximation, while the hybrid case results matched well with the datum case.

Text
Comparison of Three Strategies for Buzz-Saw Noise Propagation in an Aeroengine Intake with Flow Distortion using CFD - Accepted Manuscript
Download (4MB)

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 16 July 2025
Keywords: Angle of Attack, Bypass Ratio, Computational Aeroacoustics, Computational Fluid Dynamics, Discontinuous Galerkin Method, Flow Conditions, Rotor Stator Interactions, Static Pressure, Turbofan Design, Unsteady Reynolds Averaged Navier Stokes

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 505689
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/505689
PURE UUID: 67fc65de-add8-4664-ac9a-d47bca8bc45c
ORCID for Joseph S.P. Binns: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-6151-4038
ORCID for Long Wu: ORCID iD orcid.org/0009-0006-8578-7755

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 16 Oct 2025 16:47
Last modified: 17 Oct 2025 02:14

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Joseph S.P. Binns ORCID iD
Author: Long Wu ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×