Machine learning for accurate estimation of fetal gestational age based on ultrasound images
Machine learning for accurate estimation of fetal gestational age based on ultrasound images
Accurate estimation of gestational age is an essential component of good obstetric care and informs clinical decision-making throughout pregnancy. As the date of the last menstrual period is often unknown or uncertain, ultrasound measurement of fetal size is currently the best method for estimating gestational age. The calculation assumes an average fetal size at each gestational age. The method is accurate in the first trimester, but less so in the second and third trimesters as growth deviates from the average and variation in fetal size increases. Consequently, fetal ultrasound late in pregnancy has a wide margin of error of at least ±2 weeks’ gestation. Here, we utilise state-of-the-art machine learning methods to estimate gestational age using only image analysis of standard ultrasound planes, without any measurement information. The machine learning model is based on ultrasound images from two independent datasets: one for training and internal validation, and another for external validation. During validation, the model was blinded to the ground truth of gestational age (based on a reliable last menstrual period date and confirmatory first-trimester fetal crown rump length). We show that this approach compensates for increases in size variation and is even accurate in cases of intrauterine growth restriction. Our best machine-learning based model estimates gestational age with a mean absolute error of 3.0 (95% CI, 2.9–3.2) and 4.3 (95% CI, 4.1–4.5) days in the second and third trimesters, respectively, which outperforms current ultrasound-based clinical biometry at these gestational ages. Our method for dating the pregnancy in the second and third trimesters is, therefore, more accurate than published methods.
Lee, Lok Hin
37f2b006-2b67-4249-85ce-4d64eb343f05
Bradburn, Elizabeth
6a94e27c-29ba-4ed5-b61b-a5d92dc61918
Craik, Rachel
fbbea8df-8123-4c97-adda-8f70be3de5f8
Norris, Shane A.
1d346f1b-6d5f-4bca-ac87-7589851b75a4
9 March 2023
Lee, Lok Hin
37f2b006-2b67-4249-85ce-4d64eb343f05
Bradburn, Elizabeth
6a94e27c-29ba-4ed5-b61b-a5d92dc61918
Craik, Rachel
fbbea8df-8123-4c97-adda-8f70be3de5f8
Norris, Shane A.
1d346f1b-6d5f-4bca-ac87-7589851b75a4
Lee, Lok Hin, Bradburn, Elizabeth and Craik, Rachel
,
et al.
(2023)
Machine learning for accurate estimation of fetal gestational age based on ultrasound images.
npj Digital Medicine, 6, [36].
(doi:10.1038/s41746-023-00774-2).
Abstract
Accurate estimation of gestational age is an essential component of good obstetric care and informs clinical decision-making throughout pregnancy. As the date of the last menstrual period is often unknown or uncertain, ultrasound measurement of fetal size is currently the best method for estimating gestational age. The calculation assumes an average fetal size at each gestational age. The method is accurate in the first trimester, but less so in the second and third trimesters as growth deviates from the average and variation in fetal size increases. Consequently, fetal ultrasound late in pregnancy has a wide margin of error of at least ±2 weeks’ gestation. Here, we utilise state-of-the-art machine learning methods to estimate gestational age using only image analysis of standard ultrasound planes, without any measurement information. The machine learning model is based on ultrasound images from two independent datasets: one for training and internal validation, and another for external validation. During validation, the model was blinded to the ground truth of gestational age (based on a reliable last menstrual period date and confirmatory first-trimester fetal crown rump length). We show that this approach compensates for increases in size variation and is even accurate in cases of intrauterine growth restriction. Our best machine-learning based model estimates gestational age with a mean absolute error of 3.0 (95% CI, 2.9–3.2) and 4.3 (95% CI, 4.1–4.5) days in the second and third trimesters, respectively, which outperforms current ultrasound-based clinical biometry at these gestational ages. Our method for dating the pregnancy in the second and third trimesters is, therefore, more accurate than published methods.
Text
s41746-023-00774-2
- Version of Record
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 7 February 2023
Published date: 9 March 2023
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 505730
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/505730
ISSN: 2398-6352
PURE UUID: f44c5c51-9a14-4ad1-a1a5-53105db11cce
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 16 Oct 2025 17:40
Last modified: 17 Oct 2025 02:05
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Lok Hin Lee
Author:
Elizabeth Bradburn
Author:
Rachel Craik
Corporate Author: et al.
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics