The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Optimising a digital mindfulness-based intervention to reduce risk factors for disordered eating: a Multiphase Optimisation Strategy (MOST) Feasibility Trial

Optimising a digital mindfulness-based intervention to reduce risk factors for disordered eating: a Multiphase Optimisation Strategy (MOST) Feasibility Trial
Optimising a digital mindfulness-based intervention to reduce risk factors for disordered eating: a Multiphase Optimisation Strategy (MOST) Feasibility Trial
Objective: mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) show promise in reducing risk factors for disordered eating. Digital delivery offers scalable reach, but effects vary and engagement is generally suboptimal—potentially due to the length, complexity, and variation in content. Identifying the most effective and engaging components is necessary to streamline interventions. Guided by the multiphase optimization strategy (MOST), this study assessed the feasibility of a factorial trial to evaluate whether including emotion regulation (ER) and self-compassion (SC) enhances the effects of decentred awareness and acceptance (DA + A, observing thoughts and feelings as separate from the self) in a digital MBI.

Method: a 2 × 2 factorial design tested four intervention conditions. Each included DA + A content, with or without added ER and/or SC. Participants (N = 92, M = 21.1 years, range = 18–32) were randomized and given 3-weeks' access. Feasibility outcomes included recruitment, retention, data analysis, engagement, and acceptability. Intervention outcomes—weight and shape concerns, negative affect, mindfulness, ER, and SC—were assessed at baseline, postintervention, and 1-month follow-up.

Results: recruitment exceeded targets. Retention was acceptable (58% completed postintervention and 59% follow-up assessments). All planned analyses for the main trial were feasible. Engagement met preregistered criteria (77%–85% completed Module 1 across ER and SC conditions; mean of four modules). Acceptability was high (M = 4.28/5). Participants valued reminders and provided design suggestions.

Discussion: findings support progression to a fully powered optimization trial. This study demonstrates that MOST can be embedded within a pilot study, providing a foundation to develop more effective, engaging, and scalable interventions.
0276-3478
Osborne, Emma L.
778546ca-0509-4975-87f2-50e1692eee53
Ainsworth, Ben
b02d78c3-aa8b-462d-a534-31f1bf164f81
Hooper, Nic
2d7f1bf2-bdb9-4bf8-bb5c-53e64fce0e12
Chadwick, Paul
4476b67c-8555-49a5-b6e5-3f756d13d5bd
Atkinson, Melissa J.
04f06d58-d3bd-41ee-b511-aa77fb6d0399
Osborne, Emma L.
778546ca-0509-4975-87f2-50e1692eee53
Ainsworth, Ben
b02d78c3-aa8b-462d-a534-31f1bf164f81
Hooper, Nic
2d7f1bf2-bdb9-4bf8-bb5c-53e64fce0e12
Chadwick, Paul
4476b67c-8555-49a5-b6e5-3f756d13d5bd
Atkinson, Melissa J.
04f06d58-d3bd-41ee-b511-aa77fb6d0399

Osborne, Emma L., Ainsworth, Ben, Hooper, Nic, Chadwick, Paul and Atkinson, Melissa J. (2025) Optimising a digital mindfulness-based intervention to reduce risk factors for disordered eating: a Multiphase Optimisation Strategy (MOST) Feasibility Trial. International Journal of Eating Disorders. (doi:10.1002/eat.24546).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Objective: mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) show promise in reducing risk factors for disordered eating. Digital delivery offers scalable reach, but effects vary and engagement is generally suboptimal—potentially due to the length, complexity, and variation in content. Identifying the most effective and engaging components is necessary to streamline interventions. Guided by the multiphase optimization strategy (MOST), this study assessed the feasibility of a factorial trial to evaluate whether including emotion regulation (ER) and self-compassion (SC) enhances the effects of decentred awareness and acceptance (DA + A, observing thoughts and feelings as separate from the self) in a digital MBI.

Method: a 2 × 2 factorial design tested four intervention conditions. Each included DA + A content, with or without added ER and/or SC. Participants (N = 92, M = 21.1 years, range = 18–32) were randomized and given 3-weeks' access. Feasibility outcomes included recruitment, retention, data analysis, engagement, and acceptability. Intervention outcomes—weight and shape concerns, negative affect, mindfulness, ER, and SC—were assessed at baseline, postintervention, and 1-month follow-up.

Results: recruitment exceeded targets. Retention was acceptable (58% completed postintervention and 59% follow-up assessments). All planned analyses for the main trial were feasible. Engagement met preregistered criteria (77%–85% completed Module 1 across ER and SC conditions; mean of four modules). Acceptability was high (M = 4.28/5). Participants valued reminders and provided design suggestions.

Discussion: findings support progression to a fully powered optimization trial. This study demonstrates that MOST can be embedded within a pilot study, providing a foundation to develop more effective, engaging, and scalable interventions.

Text
Osborne et al. 2025_IJED Accepted Manuscript_MOST Feasibility Trial - Accepted Manuscript
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (240kB)
Text
Intl J Eating Disorders - 2025 - Osborne - Optimizing a Digital Mindfulness‐Based Intervention to Reduce Risk Factors for - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (587kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 4 September 2025
e-pub ahead of print date: 16 September 2025

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 505737
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/505737
ISSN: 0276-3478
PURE UUID: 92020863-3a13-4cec-b80a-ca97bbf9d22d
ORCID for Ben Ainsworth: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-5098-1092

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 17 Oct 2025 16:34
Last modified: 18 Oct 2025 01:44

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Emma L. Osborne
Author: Ben Ainsworth ORCID iD
Author: Nic Hooper
Author: Paul Chadwick
Author: Melissa J. Atkinson

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×