Comparison of flame describing functions measured in single and multiple injector configurations
Comparison of flame describing functions measured in single and multiple injector configurations
Recent investigations of combustion instabilities in annular systems indicate that considerable insights may be gained by using information gathered in single-sector experiments. Such experiments are, for example, employed to measure flame describing functions (FDFs), which represent the flame response to incident perturbations. These data may be used in combination with low-order models to interpret instabilities in multiple injector annular systems. It is known, however, that the structure and dynamical behavior of an isolated flame do not necessarily coincide with those of a flame placed in an annular environment with neighboring side flames. It is then worth analyzing effects that may be induced by the difference in lateral boundary conditions and specifically examining the extent to which the FDF data from single-sector experiments portrays the dynamical response of the flame in the annular environment. These issues are investigated with a new setup named TICCA-Spray, which comprises a linear arrangement of three injectors. The central flame is surrounded by two identical side flames in a rectangular geometry with key dimensions, sidewall separation, and spacing between injectors identical to those of the annular system MICCA-Spray. The describing function of the central flame is determined with techniques recently developed in single-sector experiments (SICCA-Spray). The FDFs obtained in the two configurations are compared for two swirler types having different swirl numbers and pressure drops. The effect of the swirl direction of the neighboring injectors is also explored by operating with co- and counter-swirl combinations. Differences between FDFs determined in the two test facilities, sometimes modest and in other cases less negligible, are found to depend on the flames' spatial extension and interactions. The general inference is that the FDFs measured in a single-injector combustor are better suited if the flame-wall interaction is weak, and provided that the area is equivalent to that of a single sector of an annular combustor. Nonetheless, using a multi-injector system would be more appropriate for a more precise FDF determination.
Rajendram Soundararajan, Preethi
27962fcb-d8a8-405a-b137-086815ec8e29
Durox, Daniel
5abd6445-57f2-41a0-b831-983ef4239273
Vignat, Guillaume
f808aa32-377e-48a7-bc60-2db7e1767e09
Renaud, Antoine
aedb2589-2a4a-4614-b9fa-1da56f9c7b0d
Beaunier, Jerome
cd2ddcee-2e12-47bc-890a-1ab30414312d
Candel, Sebastien
c8f272d5-74e9-4fdf-9052-30122eb3a372
Rajendram Soundararajan, Preethi
27962fcb-d8a8-405a-b137-086815ec8e29
Durox, Daniel
5abd6445-57f2-41a0-b831-983ef4239273
Vignat, Guillaume
f808aa32-377e-48a7-bc60-2db7e1767e09
Renaud, Antoine
aedb2589-2a4a-4614-b9fa-1da56f9c7b0d
Beaunier, Jerome
cd2ddcee-2e12-47bc-890a-1ab30414312d
Candel, Sebastien
c8f272d5-74e9-4fdf-9052-30122eb3a372
Rajendram Soundararajan, Preethi, Durox, Daniel, Vignat, Guillaume, Renaud, Antoine, Beaunier, Jerome and Candel, Sebastien
(2022)
Comparison of flame describing functions measured in single and multiple injector configurations.
Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 144 (11), [111023].
(doi:10.1115/1.4055451).
Abstract
Recent investigations of combustion instabilities in annular systems indicate that considerable insights may be gained by using information gathered in single-sector experiments. Such experiments are, for example, employed to measure flame describing functions (FDFs), which represent the flame response to incident perturbations. These data may be used in combination with low-order models to interpret instabilities in multiple injector annular systems. It is known, however, that the structure and dynamical behavior of an isolated flame do not necessarily coincide with those of a flame placed in an annular environment with neighboring side flames. It is then worth analyzing effects that may be induced by the difference in lateral boundary conditions and specifically examining the extent to which the FDF data from single-sector experiments portrays the dynamical response of the flame in the annular environment. These issues are investigated with a new setup named TICCA-Spray, which comprises a linear arrangement of three injectors. The central flame is surrounded by two identical side flames in a rectangular geometry with key dimensions, sidewall separation, and spacing between injectors identical to those of the annular system MICCA-Spray. The describing function of the central flame is determined with techniques recently developed in single-sector experiments (SICCA-Spray). The FDFs obtained in the two configurations are compared for two swirler types having different swirl numbers and pressure drops. The effect of the swirl direction of the neighboring injectors is also explored by operating with co- and counter-swirl combinations. Differences between FDFs determined in the two test facilities, sometimes modest and in other cases less negligible, are found to depend on the flames' spatial extension and interactions. The general inference is that the FDFs measured in a single-injector combustor are better suited if the flame-wall interaction is weak, and provided that the area is equivalent to that of a single sector of an annular combustor. Nonetheless, using a multi-injector system would be more appropriate for a more precise FDF determination.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
e-pub ahead of print date: 28 September 2022
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 505783
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/505783
ISSN: 0742-4795
PURE UUID: 15f55d5c-0b13-466f-b5ac-2b8c8cc53a25
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 20 Oct 2025 16:32
Last modified: 21 Oct 2025 02:12
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Preethi Rajendram Soundararajan
Author:
Daniel Durox
Author:
Guillaume Vignat
Author:
Antoine Renaud
Author:
Jerome Beaunier
Author:
Sebastien Candel
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics