The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Navigating multi-stakeholder fieldwork in return rural entrepreneurship: methodological challenges and reflexive strategies

Navigating multi-stakeholder fieldwork in return rural entrepreneurship: methodological challenges and reflexive strategies
Navigating multi-stakeholder fieldwork in return rural entrepreneurship: methodological challenges and reflexive strategies
Rural revitalization policies in China have encouraged urban migrants to return rural area and engage in entrepreneurship, reshaping rural economies and communities. While existing research has explored return rural entrepreneurs’ motivations and impacts, less attention has been paid to the methodological complexities of studying this phenomenon in a multi-actor setting. This paper reflects on the challenges of conducting qualitative research among return rural entrepreneurs (RRErs), local government officials, and village residents in six rural tourism villages in Zhejiang Province. Employing interviews, participant observation, and elements of action research, this study examines how researchers navigate multi-role positioning, stakeholder interactions, the boundary between observation and intervention, and ethical concerns surrounding data validity. Findings highlight the fluidity of researcher positionality, where shifting between observer, participant, and policy consultant roles influences data collection and interpretation. The paper discusses the difficulty of balancing relationships between different interest groups, ensuring research neutrality, and mitigating reactivity effects. It also reflects on ethical dilemmas such as maintaining confidentiality in close-knit rural communities and avoiding unintentional influence on entrepreneurial practices. By integrating reflexive journaling, methodological triangulation, and participatory ethics, the study proposes strategies to enhance research rigor in complex qualitative fieldwork. This paper contributes to geographies of entrepreneurship, rural development, and qualitative methodologies by offering insights into researching return migration and entrepreneurship in policy-driven rural transformation contexts. It underscores the importance of reflexivity in multi-stakeholder research and provides transferable lessons for scholars conducting engaged fieldwork in dynamic socio-spatial environments.
Wang, Tongming
ac744ae2-3618-484d-96b0-28247ce020ec
Wang, Tongming
ac744ae2-3618-484d-96b0-28247ce020ec

Wang, Tongming (2025) Navigating multi-stakeholder fieldwork in return rural entrepreneurship: methodological challenges and reflexive strategies. Royal Geographical Society with IBG Annual International Conference 2025: Geographies of creativity/creative geographies, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom. 26 - 29 Aug 2025.

Record type: Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)

Abstract

Rural revitalization policies in China have encouraged urban migrants to return rural area and engage in entrepreneurship, reshaping rural economies and communities. While existing research has explored return rural entrepreneurs’ motivations and impacts, less attention has been paid to the methodological complexities of studying this phenomenon in a multi-actor setting. This paper reflects on the challenges of conducting qualitative research among return rural entrepreneurs (RRErs), local government officials, and village residents in six rural tourism villages in Zhejiang Province. Employing interviews, participant observation, and elements of action research, this study examines how researchers navigate multi-role positioning, stakeholder interactions, the boundary between observation and intervention, and ethical concerns surrounding data validity. Findings highlight the fluidity of researcher positionality, where shifting between observer, participant, and policy consultant roles influences data collection and interpretation. The paper discusses the difficulty of balancing relationships between different interest groups, ensuring research neutrality, and mitigating reactivity effects. It also reflects on ethical dilemmas such as maintaining confidentiality in close-knit rural communities and avoiding unintentional influence on entrepreneurial practices. By integrating reflexive journaling, methodological triangulation, and participatory ethics, the study proposes strategies to enhance research rigor in complex qualitative fieldwork. This paper contributes to geographies of entrepreneurship, rural development, and qualitative methodologies by offering insights into researching return migration and entrepreneurship in policy-driven rural transformation contexts. It underscores the importance of reflexivity in multi-stakeholder research and provides transferable lessons for scholars conducting engaged fieldwork in dynamic socio-spatial environments.

Text
detailed_programme
Download (7MB)

More information

Published date: 22 August 2025
Venue - Dates: Royal Geographical Society with IBG Annual International Conference 2025: Geographies of creativity/creative geographies, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom, 2025-08-26 - 2025-08-29

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 505862
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/505862
PURE UUID: e0462aae-d05c-43fd-b31f-210dfdea1bab
ORCID for Tongming Wang: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-5183-7332

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 21 Oct 2025 17:00
Last modified: 22 Oct 2025 02:05

Export record

Contributors

Author: Tongming Wang ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×