The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Transparent reporting of observational studies emulating a Target Trial—the TARGET statement

Transparent reporting of observational studies emulating a Target Trial—the TARGET statement
Transparent reporting of observational studies emulating a Target Trial—the TARGET statement
Importance: when randomized trials are unavailable or not feasible, observational studies can be used to answer causal questions about the comparative effects of interventions by attempting to emulate a hypothetical pragmatic randomized trial (target trial). Published guidance to aid reporting of these studies is not available.

Objective: to develop consensus-based guidance for reporting observational studies performed to estimate causal effects by explicitly emulating a target trial.

Design, setting, and participants: the Transparent Reporting of Observational Studies Emulating a Target Trial (TARGET) guideline was developed using the Enhancing the Quality and Transparency of Health Research (EQUATOR) framework. The development included (1) a systematic review of reporting practices in published studies that had explicitly aimed to emulate a target trial; (2) a 2-round online survey (August 2023 to March 2024; 18 expert participants from 6 countries) to assess the importance of candidate items selected from previous research and to identify additional items; (3) a 3-day expert consensus meeting (June 2024; 18 panelists) to refine the scope of the guideline and draft the checklist; and (4) pilot of the draft checklist with stakeholders (n = 108; September 2024 to February 2025). The checklist was further refined based on feedback on successive drafts.

Findings: the 21-item TARGET checklist is organized into 6 sections (abstract, introduction, methods, results, discussion, other information). TARGET provides guidance for reporting observational studies of interventions explicitly emulating a parallel group, individually randomized target trial, with adjustment for baseline confounders. Key recommendations are to (1) identify the study as an observational emulation of a target trial; (2) summarize the causal question and reason for emulating a target trial, (3) clearly specify the target trial protocol (ie, the causal estimand, identifying assumptions, data analysis plan) and how it was mapped to the observational data, and (4) report the estimate obtained for each causal estimand, its precision, and findings from additional analyses to assess the sensitivity of the estimates to assumptions, and design and analysis choices.

Conclusions and relevance: application of the TARGET guideline recommendations aims to improve reporting transparency and peer review and help researchers, clinicians, and other readers interpret and apply the results.
0098-7484
1084-1093
Cashin, Aidan G.
e90664b8-66bd-4930-9412-6fd29fa53fef
Hansford, Harrison J.
f175946d-61b1-4492-b179-7ba905a30351
Hernán, Miguel A.
df1d8aeb-2c5a-4d54-80ec-cf887c340fb1
Swanson, Sonja A.
209b40a2-bfd4-4afa-9536-e4042e6aa3fd
Lee, Hopin
21caeab9-6f3d-480e-a639-543c724dae5b
Jones, Matthew D.
2faf15a5-fcd2-498d-875c-4cc427bf4425
Dahabreh, Issa J.
572961a1-405b-4b85-803f-bc1991f39257
Dickerman, Barbra A.
0f6b20e1-5478-4e23-805e-74c20b74f9dd
Egger, Matthias
84a6571b-8728-4b16-89d3-d5dfd207ad06
Garcia-Albeniz, Xabier
14f1770a-d236-4768-aebc-9cce4106c791
Golub, Robert M.
9b48f74f-81d2-488b-bedc-c0402fcafa50
Islam, Nazrul
e5345196-7479-438f-b4f6-c372d2135586
Lodi, Sara
3dbbc923-e8a1-40bb-8669-0e6fd87cdc70
Moreno-Betancur, Margarita
984f4f32-8c39-4feb-a89c-35a927ce53e6
Pearson, Sallie-Anne
9eece04a-456f-47ef-a6e4-af8a9849f078
Schneeweiss, Sebastian
a67accec-a96e-4eea-8012-9894f2047b1f
Sharp, Melissa K.
315cb352-d9ce-42b0-94f7-b6d9a43a2da3
Sterne, Jonathan A.C.
3dc2fb32-f2c7-4035-9fd1-a9112458b38e
Stuart, Elizabeth A.
2e3c0ece-e166-4925-b4bd-4a1195edc773
McAuley, James H.
3d0d13bb-03e6-434e-999b-985585195d19
Cashin, Aidan G.
e90664b8-66bd-4930-9412-6fd29fa53fef
Hansford, Harrison J.
f175946d-61b1-4492-b179-7ba905a30351
Hernán, Miguel A.
df1d8aeb-2c5a-4d54-80ec-cf887c340fb1
Swanson, Sonja A.
209b40a2-bfd4-4afa-9536-e4042e6aa3fd
Lee, Hopin
21caeab9-6f3d-480e-a639-543c724dae5b
Jones, Matthew D.
2faf15a5-fcd2-498d-875c-4cc427bf4425
Dahabreh, Issa J.
572961a1-405b-4b85-803f-bc1991f39257
Dickerman, Barbra A.
0f6b20e1-5478-4e23-805e-74c20b74f9dd
Egger, Matthias
84a6571b-8728-4b16-89d3-d5dfd207ad06
Garcia-Albeniz, Xabier
14f1770a-d236-4768-aebc-9cce4106c791
Golub, Robert M.
9b48f74f-81d2-488b-bedc-c0402fcafa50
Islam, Nazrul
e5345196-7479-438f-b4f6-c372d2135586
Lodi, Sara
3dbbc923-e8a1-40bb-8669-0e6fd87cdc70
Moreno-Betancur, Margarita
984f4f32-8c39-4feb-a89c-35a927ce53e6
Pearson, Sallie-Anne
9eece04a-456f-47ef-a6e4-af8a9849f078
Schneeweiss, Sebastian
a67accec-a96e-4eea-8012-9894f2047b1f
Sharp, Melissa K.
315cb352-d9ce-42b0-94f7-b6d9a43a2da3
Sterne, Jonathan A.C.
3dc2fb32-f2c7-4035-9fd1-a9112458b38e
Stuart, Elizabeth A.
2e3c0ece-e166-4925-b4bd-4a1195edc773
McAuley, James H.
3d0d13bb-03e6-434e-999b-985585195d19

Cashin, Aidan G., Hansford, Harrison J., Hernán, Miguel A., Swanson, Sonja A., Lee, Hopin, Jones, Matthew D., Dahabreh, Issa J., Dickerman, Barbra A., Egger, Matthias, Garcia-Albeniz, Xabier, Golub, Robert M., Islam, Nazrul, Lodi, Sara, Moreno-Betancur, Margarita, Pearson, Sallie-Anne, Schneeweiss, Sebastian, Sharp, Melissa K., Sterne, Jonathan A.C., Stuart, Elizabeth A. and McAuley, James H. (2025) Transparent reporting of observational studies emulating a Target Trial—the TARGET statement. JAMA, 334 (12), 1084-1093. (doi:10.1001/jama.2025.13350).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Importance: when randomized trials are unavailable or not feasible, observational studies can be used to answer causal questions about the comparative effects of interventions by attempting to emulate a hypothetical pragmatic randomized trial (target trial). Published guidance to aid reporting of these studies is not available.

Objective: to develop consensus-based guidance for reporting observational studies performed to estimate causal effects by explicitly emulating a target trial.

Design, setting, and participants: the Transparent Reporting of Observational Studies Emulating a Target Trial (TARGET) guideline was developed using the Enhancing the Quality and Transparency of Health Research (EQUATOR) framework. The development included (1) a systematic review of reporting practices in published studies that had explicitly aimed to emulate a target trial; (2) a 2-round online survey (August 2023 to March 2024; 18 expert participants from 6 countries) to assess the importance of candidate items selected from previous research and to identify additional items; (3) a 3-day expert consensus meeting (June 2024; 18 panelists) to refine the scope of the guideline and draft the checklist; and (4) pilot of the draft checklist with stakeholders (n = 108; September 2024 to February 2025). The checklist was further refined based on feedback on successive drafts.

Findings: the 21-item TARGET checklist is organized into 6 sections (abstract, introduction, methods, results, discussion, other information). TARGET provides guidance for reporting observational studies of interventions explicitly emulating a parallel group, individually randomized target trial, with adjustment for baseline confounders. Key recommendations are to (1) identify the study as an observational emulation of a target trial; (2) summarize the causal question and reason for emulating a target trial, (3) clearly specify the target trial protocol (ie, the causal estimand, identifying assumptions, data analysis plan) and how it was mapped to the observational data, and (4) report the estimate obtained for each causal estimand, its precision, and findings from additional analyses to assess the sensitivity of the estimates to assumptions, and design and analysis choices.

Conclusions and relevance: application of the TARGET guideline recommendations aims to improve reporting transparency and peer review and help researchers, clinicians, and other readers interpret and apply the results.

Text
Revised_TARGET Statement_Clean - Accepted Manuscript
Download (351kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 16 July 2025
e-pub ahead of print date: 3 September 2025
Published date: 3 September 2025

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 505877
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/505877
ISSN: 0098-7484
PURE UUID: de1361eb-defd-47c7-ab36-2da83b929e41
ORCID for Nazrul Islam: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3982-4325

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 22 Oct 2025 16:32
Last modified: 05 Nov 2025 03:04

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Aidan G. Cashin
Author: Harrison J. Hansford
Author: Miguel A. Hernán
Author: Sonja A. Swanson
Author: Hopin Lee
Author: Matthew D. Jones
Author: Issa J. Dahabreh
Author: Barbra A. Dickerman
Author: Matthias Egger
Author: Xabier Garcia-Albeniz
Author: Robert M. Golub
Author: Nazrul Islam ORCID iD
Author: Sara Lodi
Author: Margarita Moreno-Betancur
Author: Sallie-Anne Pearson
Author: Sebastian Schneeweiss
Author: Melissa K. Sharp
Author: Jonathan A.C. Sterne
Author: Elizabeth A. Stuart
Author: James H. McAuley

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×