The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

“More than bees and flowers”: understanding public perceptions of biodiversity in the context of food production and consumption

“More than bees and flowers”: understanding public perceptions of biodiversity in the context of food production and consumption
“More than bees and flowers”: understanding public perceptions of biodiversity in the context of food production and consumption

Biodiversity, crucial for resilient agri-food systems, is declining at an unprecedented rate, largely driven by agricultural practices. In response, scientists and policymakers have called for a transition towards biodiversity-enhancing food systems, emphasizing the need for a systemic change that includes the consumer. However, as the term biodiversity is relatively new and complex, there have been worries whether broader publics understand and value biodiversity enough to support conservation practices or alter their consumption. By using associations as a means to access broader mental representations, the study explores how people make sense of the term biodiversity. Participants of a survey (N = 1971) on biodiverse food production and consumption in the Netherlands were asked to list 5–7 associations they had with biodiversity. Thematic content analysis was performed on the associations elicited, and themes were further validated with focus group discussions (N = 24) on biodiversity. The associations elicited revealed that participants mostly associate biodiversity with species diversity, with a focus on animals and plants. Many viewed biodiversity as valuable for ensuring a quality of nature and life, but some expressed scepticism or negative connotations, considering biodiversity a “hype” or questioning biodiversity loss. Lastly, associations showed that the relation between agricultural practices and biodiversity was understood both in terms of the negative consequences agriculture could have on biodiversity, as well as how it could contribute to enhancing biodiversity. Next to providing more deliberative and diverse perspectives on biodiversity and conservation, such insights could be essential for identifying how the public could be more engaged in the transition towards biodiversity-enhancing food systems.

Biodiverse food systems, Consumer research, Public understanding, The Netherlands, Word association
0889-048X
2809-2824
Shen, Julia Q.
6a26e570-aa45-437a-815f-cad6c1abcce2
House, Jonas
d12ff336-7b23-4143-8c47-2b2bc072352e
de Vries, Jasper R.
6455f008-5b54-402b-825e-a4efb744f906
Poortvliet, P. Marijn
7121b240-681c-4d52-94e2-c0f32fcab662
Shen, Julia Q.
6a26e570-aa45-437a-815f-cad6c1abcce2
House, Jonas
d12ff336-7b23-4143-8c47-2b2bc072352e
de Vries, Jasper R.
6455f008-5b54-402b-825e-a4efb744f906
Poortvliet, P. Marijn
7121b240-681c-4d52-94e2-c0f32fcab662

Shen, Julia Q., House, Jonas, de Vries, Jasper R. and Poortvliet, P. Marijn (2025) “More than bees and flowers”: understanding public perceptions of biodiversity in the context of food production and consumption. Agriculture and Human Values, 42 (4), 2809-2824. (doi:10.1007/s10460-025-10779-0).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Biodiversity, crucial for resilient agri-food systems, is declining at an unprecedented rate, largely driven by agricultural practices. In response, scientists and policymakers have called for a transition towards biodiversity-enhancing food systems, emphasizing the need for a systemic change that includes the consumer. However, as the term biodiversity is relatively new and complex, there have been worries whether broader publics understand and value biodiversity enough to support conservation practices or alter their consumption. By using associations as a means to access broader mental representations, the study explores how people make sense of the term biodiversity. Participants of a survey (N = 1971) on biodiverse food production and consumption in the Netherlands were asked to list 5–7 associations they had with biodiversity. Thematic content analysis was performed on the associations elicited, and themes were further validated with focus group discussions (N = 24) on biodiversity. The associations elicited revealed that participants mostly associate biodiversity with species diversity, with a focus on animals and plants. Many viewed biodiversity as valuable for ensuring a quality of nature and life, but some expressed scepticism or negative connotations, considering biodiversity a “hype” or questioning biodiversity loss. Lastly, associations showed that the relation between agricultural practices and biodiversity was understood both in terms of the negative consequences agriculture could have on biodiversity, as well as how it could contribute to enhancing biodiversity. Next to providing more deliberative and diverse perspectives on biodiversity and conservation, such insights could be essential for identifying how the public could be more engaged in the transition towards biodiversity-enhancing food systems.

Text
s10460-025-10779-0 - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (1MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 31 July 2025
e-pub ahead of print date: 28 August 2025
Published date: 28 August 2025
Keywords: Biodiverse food systems, Consumer research, Public understanding, The Netherlands, Word association

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 505961
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/505961
ISSN: 0889-048X
PURE UUID: 0d01cf93-4185-419f-8942-4b9762fc85a8
ORCID for Jonas House: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-6003-8276

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 24 Oct 2025 16:38
Last modified: 05 Dec 2025 03:08

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Julia Q. Shen
Author: Jonas House ORCID iD
Author: Jasper R. de Vries
Author: P. Marijn Poortvliet

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×