What effect do goal setting interventions have on physical activity and psychological outcomes in insufficiently active adults? A systematic review and meta-analysis
What effect do goal setting interventions have on physical activity and psychological outcomes in insufficiently active adults? A systematic review and meta-analysis
Background: goal setting is commonly used for promoting physical activity (PA) among insufficiently active individuals. Previous reviews have analyzed the effects of goal setting on PA, but the purpose of this systematic review was to examine the concurrent effects of goal setting on PA and psychological outcomes in insufficiently active individuals to support interventions aiming to produce sustained PA behavior change.
Methods: in this review (PROSPERO: CRD42021243970), we identified 13 studies with 1208 insufficiently active adults that reported the effects of goal-setting interventions (range 3–24 wk) on both PA and psychological outcomes (eg, self-efficacy, motivation, and affect). We used meta-analysis and narrative synthesis to analyze these effects.
Results: all goals used in the included studies were specific goals. Setting specific goals had a large, positive effect on PA (g [standard mean difference] = 1.11 [P < .001]; 95% confidence interval, 0.74–1.47), but only a small, positive effect on the combined psychological outcomes (g [standard mean difference] = 0.25 [P < .001]; 95% CI, 0.10–0.40). Moderator analyses revealed that interventions that did not reward participants had a significantly greater effect on PA than interventions that did provide rewards (g = 1.30 vs 0.60, respectively, P ≤ .003). No other significant moderators were found.
Conclusion: our review offers initial insight into the long-term effects of specific goals on PA and psychological outcomes in insufficiently active adults. Further research that examines the PA and psychological effects of goal-setting interventions and investigates a wider range of goal types could develop a stronger evidence base to inform intervention for insufficiently active individuals.
541-553
Garstang, Katie R.
51731dac-e083-47d9-8ad7-bf4199541827
Jackman, Patricia C.
4cd1ef91-96f3-4cac-979c-ed78d5ca90b6
Healy, Laura C.
8950f3eb-84a5-485d-9bbb-e00ba2c7ee57
Cooper, Simon B.
3b456854-0b8c-47d0-8e79-114e30495355
Magistro, Daniele
ab9296bc-fda6-469e-a3f8-3a574faa1b7e
June 2024
Garstang, Katie R.
51731dac-e083-47d9-8ad7-bf4199541827
Jackman, Patricia C.
4cd1ef91-96f3-4cac-979c-ed78d5ca90b6
Healy, Laura C.
8950f3eb-84a5-485d-9bbb-e00ba2c7ee57
Cooper, Simon B.
3b456854-0b8c-47d0-8e79-114e30495355
Magistro, Daniele
ab9296bc-fda6-469e-a3f8-3a574faa1b7e
Garstang, Katie R., Jackman, Patricia C., Healy, Laura C., Cooper, Simon B. and Magistro, Daniele
(2024)
What effect do goal setting interventions have on physical activity and psychological outcomes in insufficiently active adults? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 21 (6), .
(doi:10.1123/jpah.2023-0340).
Abstract
Background: goal setting is commonly used for promoting physical activity (PA) among insufficiently active individuals. Previous reviews have analyzed the effects of goal setting on PA, but the purpose of this systematic review was to examine the concurrent effects of goal setting on PA and psychological outcomes in insufficiently active individuals to support interventions aiming to produce sustained PA behavior change.
Methods: in this review (PROSPERO: CRD42021243970), we identified 13 studies with 1208 insufficiently active adults that reported the effects of goal-setting interventions (range 3–24 wk) on both PA and psychological outcomes (eg, self-efficacy, motivation, and affect). We used meta-analysis and narrative synthesis to analyze these effects.
Results: all goals used in the included studies were specific goals. Setting specific goals had a large, positive effect on PA (g [standard mean difference] = 1.11 [P < .001]; 95% confidence interval, 0.74–1.47), but only a small, positive effect on the combined psychological outcomes (g [standard mean difference] = 0.25 [P < .001]; 95% CI, 0.10–0.40). Moderator analyses revealed that interventions that did not reward participants had a significantly greater effect on PA than interventions that did provide rewards (g = 1.30 vs 0.60, respectively, P ≤ .003). No other significant moderators were found.
Conclusion: our review offers initial insight into the long-term effects of specific goals on PA and psychological outcomes in insufficiently active adults. Further research that examines the PA and psychological effects of goal-setting interventions and investigates a wider range of goal types could develop a stronger evidence base to inform intervention for insufficiently active individuals.
Text
1873979_Healy
- Accepted Manuscript
More information
Published date: June 2024
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 506038
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/506038
ISSN: 1543-3080
PURE UUID: 21d9128b-b4fe-486a-9d7a-7e18c8bfc3ec
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 28 Oct 2025 17:33
Last modified: 29 Oct 2025 03:14
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Katie R. Garstang
Author:
Patricia C. Jackman
Author:
Laura C. Healy
Author:
Simon B. Cooper
Author:
Daniele Magistro
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics