Rethinking accountability in public service delivery: The design mismatch problem and its policy mix solutions
Rethinking accountability in public service delivery: The design mismatch problem and its policy mix solutions
This article addresses the two-fold question of why accountability systems fail and how they can be fixed in public service delivery through the novel lens of policy design. More specifically, it scrutinizes the much-overlooked means-ends mismatch of the design of accountability policies and explores how a policy mix approach can solve this mismatch problem. Informed by carefully selected empirical examples, it illustrates how nodality-, authority-, treasure- and organization-based accountability tools need to be deployed differently to fulfill the ends that they are deemed most appropriate for, and how this systemic package can benefit from a finetuned distinction between primary and secondary tools alongside substantive and procedural tools. As a first attempt to connect the literature on accountability and that on policy design, the article demonstrates the theoretical value and practical relevance of a much-needed “bird view” of the “forest” of accountability beyond the usual scrutiny of its “trees” and “branches.”.
Accountability, control, improvement, policy design, policy instruments, policy mix
Yan, Yifei
58cf8978-8af4-4efb-ba84-2437ee5fca11
6 October 2025
Yan, Yifei
58cf8978-8af4-4efb-ba84-2437ee5fca11
Yan, Yifei
(2025)
Rethinking accountability in public service delivery: The design mismatch problem and its policy mix solutions.
Policy Design and Practice.
(doi:10.1080/25741292.2025.2565871).
Abstract
This article addresses the two-fold question of why accountability systems fail and how they can be fixed in public service delivery through the novel lens of policy design. More specifically, it scrutinizes the much-overlooked means-ends mismatch of the design of accountability policies and explores how a policy mix approach can solve this mismatch problem. Informed by carefully selected empirical examples, it illustrates how nodality-, authority-, treasure- and organization-based accountability tools need to be deployed differently to fulfill the ends that they are deemed most appropriate for, and how this systemic package can benefit from a finetuned distinction between primary and secondary tools alongside substantive and procedural tools. As a first attempt to connect the literature on accountability and that on policy design, the article demonstrates the theoretical value and practical relevance of a much-needed “bird view” of the “forest” of accountability beyond the usual scrutiny of its “trees” and “branches.”.
Text
Rethinking accountability MS anonymous clean 20250914
- Accepted Manuscript
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy
Text
Rethinking accountability in public service delivery the design mismatch problem and its policy mix solutions
- Version of Record
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 15 September 2025
Published date: 6 October 2025
Additional Information:
Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
Keywords:
Accountability, control, improvement, policy design, policy instruments, policy mix
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 506242
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/506242
ISSN: 2574-1292
PURE UUID: 613db03f-bd44-47e7-b231-47cf9a314d0a
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 30 Oct 2025 17:53
Last modified: 31 Oct 2025 03:03
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Yifei Yan
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics