The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Priority topics for preconception care in general practice in the UK: a consensus study

Priority topics for preconception care in general practice in the UK: a consensus study
Priority topics for preconception care in general practice in the UK: a consensus study
Background: primary care practitioners are well-positioned to support patients of reproductive age in preparing for pregnancy. Preconception care is ideally integrated when opportunities arise during routine consultations. However, practical and realistic guidance is needed to overcome implementation barriers, such as limited consultation time.

Aim: to achieve consensus among primary care practitioners and patients on topics that might be prioritised as part of opportunistic preconception care in general practice.

Methods: a three-step consensus process was undertaken: (1) identifying initial candidate topics through literature and guideline reviews, workshops with patients, and interviews with primary care practitioners; (2) prioritising topics using a three-round Delphi survey; and (3) reaching agreement on final priority topics through an online workshop. Participants were UK-based patients and primary care practitioners recruited via a Public Advisory Group, charities, and professional organisations.

Findings: the reviews and workshops/interviews with patients (n = 15) and practitioners (n = 14) identified 37 preconception care topics which were included in the Delphi survey. Eighty-five participants completed the first Delphi round, with 63 completing all three rounds. Based on the Delphi rounds, 11 topics were included and no topic met predefined criteria for exclusion. All topics were discussed at the final workshop (n = 21 participants)
and six additional topics achieved consensus to be included. Workshop participants agreed that the 17 priority topics should be combined into four topic areas: (1) knowledge of preconception health and pregnancy, (2) ideas, concerns and expectations (e.g. pregnancy intention, timing, prior pregnancy experiences), (3) health conditions (e.g. medication use, mental and physical health, immunisation), and (4) health behaviours (e.g. folic acid supplement use, smoking, alcohol consumption).

Implications: the agreed priority topic areas offer a structured foundation for opportunistic patient-centred preconception care in primary care. The findings support the need for further co-development of practical tools and support to enable implementation in routine practice.
1448-7527
Schoenaker, Danielle
84b96b87-4070-45a5-9777-5a1e4e45e818
Lovegrove, Elizabeth
d7b61630-099a-4faf-94a8-10506cc9887c
Santer, Miriam
3ce7e832-31eb-4d27-9876-3a1cd7f381dc
Matvienko-Sikar, Karen
93b8e9f3-287a-40d7-af0a-3a1ffb572e89
Carr, Helen
2d71148d-3a3f-4783-bba6-16697a350712
Alwan, Nisreen A.
0d37b320-f325-4ed3-ba51-0fe2866d5382
Godfrey, Keith
0931701e-fe2c-44b5-8f0d-ec5c7477a6fd
Schoenaker, Danielle
84b96b87-4070-45a5-9777-5a1e4e45e818
Lovegrove, Elizabeth
d7b61630-099a-4faf-94a8-10506cc9887c
Santer, Miriam
3ce7e832-31eb-4d27-9876-3a1cd7f381dc
Matvienko-Sikar, Karen
93b8e9f3-287a-40d7-af0a-3a1ffb572e89
Carr, Helen
2d71148d-3a3f-4783-bba6-16697a350712
Alwan, Nisreen A.
0d37b320-f325-4ed3-ba51-0fe2866d5382
Godfrey, Keith
0931701e-fe2c-44b5-8f0d-ec5c7477a6fd

Schoenaker, Danielle, Lovegrove, Elizabeth, Santer, Miriam, Matvienko-Sikar, Karen, Carr, Helen, Alwan, Nisreen A. and Godfrey, Keith (2025) Priority topics for preconception care in general practice in the UK: a consensus study. Australian Journal of Primary Health, 31 (4), [90]. (doi:10.1071/PYv31n4abs).

Record type: Meeting abstract

Abstract

Background: primary care practitioners are well-positioned to support patients of reproductive age in preparing for pregnancy. Preconception care is ideally integrated when opportunities arise during routine consultations. However, practical and realistic guidance is needed to overcome implementation barriers, such as limited consultation time.

Aim: to achieve consensus among primary care practitioners and patients on topics that might be prioritised as part of opportunistic preconception care in general practice.

Methods: a three-step consensus process was undertaken: (1) identifying initial candidate topics through literature and guideline reviews, workshops with patients, and interviews with primary care practitioners; (2) prioritising topics using a three-round Delphi survey; and (3) reaching agreement on final priority topics through an online workshop. Participants were UK-based patients and primary care practitioners recruited via a Public Advisory Group, charities, and professional organisations.

Findings: the reviews and workshops/interviews with patients (n = 15) and practitioners (n = 14) identified 37 preconception care topics which were included in the Delphi survey. Eighty-five participants completed the first Delphi round, with 63 completing all three rounds. Based on the Delphi rounds, 11 topics were included and no topic met predefined criteria for exclusion. All topics were discussed at the final workshop (n = 21 participants)
and six additional topics achieved consensus to be included. Workshop participants agreed that the 17 priority topics should be combined into four topic areas: (1) knowledge of preconception health and pregnancy, (2) ideas, concerns and expectations (e.g. pregnancy intention, timing, prior pregnancy experiences), (3) health conditions (e.g. medication use, mental and physical health, immunisation), and (4) health behaviours (e.g. folic acid supplement use, smoking, alcohol consumption).

Implications: the agreed priority topic areas offer a structured foundation for opportunistic patient-centred preconception care in primary care. The findings support the need for further co-development of practical tools and support to enable implementation in routine practice.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 8 August 2025

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 506283
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/506283
ISSN: 1448-7527
PURE UUID: dea28561-605b-49ee-9cd4-82063af3bdc5
ORCID for Danielle Schoenaker: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-7652-990X
ORCID for Elizabeth Lovegrove: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-0393-4266
ORCID for Miriam Santer: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-7264-5260
ORCID for Nisreen A. Alwan: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-4134-8463
ORCID for Keith Godfrey: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-4643-0618

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 03 Nov 2025 17:33
Last modified: 04 Nov 2025 03:07

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Miriam Santer ORCID iD
Author: Karen Matvienko-Sikar
Author: Helen Carr
Author: Keith Godfrey ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×