Priority topics for preconception care in general practice in the UK: a consensus study
Priority topics for preconception care in general practice in the UK: a consensus study
Background: primary care practitioners are well-positioned to support patients of reproductive age in preparing for pregnancy. Preconception care is ideally integrated when opportunities arise during routine consultations. However, practical and realistic guidance is needed to overcome implementation barriers, such as limited consultation time.
Aim: to achieve consensus among primary care practitioners and patients on topics that might be prioritised as part of opportunistic preconception care in general practice.
Methods: a three-step consensus process was undertaken: (1) identifying initial candidate topics through literature and guideline reviews, workshops with patients, and interviews with primary care practitioners; (2) prioritising topics using a three-round Delphi survey; and (3) reaching agreement on final priority topics through an online workshop. Participants were UK-based patients and primary care practitioners recruited via a Public Advisory Group, charities, and professional organisations.
Findings: the reviews and workshops/interviews with patients (n = 15) and practitioners (n = 14) identified 37 preconception care topics which were included in the Delphi survey. Eighty-five participants completed the first Delphi round, with 63 completing all three rounds. Based on the Delphi rounds, 11 topics were included and no topic met predefined criteria for exclusion. All topics were discussed at the final workshop (n = 21 participants)
and six additional topics achieved consensus to be included. Workshop participants agreed that the 17 priority topics should be combined into four topic areas: (1) knowledge of preconception health and pregnancy, (2) ideas, concerns and expectations (e.g. pregnancy intention, timing, prior pregnancy experiences), (3) health conditions (e.g. medication use, mental and physical health, immunisation), and (4) health behaviours (e.g. folic acid supplement use, smoking, alcohol consumption).
Implications: the agreed priority topic areas offer a structured foundation for opportunistic patient-centred preconception care in primary care. The findings support the need for further co-development of practical tools and support to enable implementation in routine practice.
Schoenaker, Danielle
84b96b87-4070-45a5-9777-5a1e4e45e818
Lovegrove, Elizabeth
d7b61630-099a-4faf-94a8-10506cc9887c
Santer, Miriam
3ce7e832-31eb-4d27-9876-3a1cd7f381dc
Matvienko-Sikar, Karen
93b8e9f3-287a-40d7-af0a-3a1ffb572e89
Carr, Helen
2d71148d-3a3f-4783-bba6-16697a350712
Alwan, Nisreen A.
0d37b320-f325-4ed3-ba51-0fe2866d5382
Godfrey, Keith
0931701e-fe2c-44b5-8f0d-ec5c7477a6fd
8 August 2025
Schoenaker, Danielle
84b96b87-4070-45a5-9777-5a1e4e45e818
Lovegrove, Elizabeth
d7b61630-099a-4faf-94a8-10506cc9887c
Santer, Miriam
3ce7e832-31eb-4d27-9876-3a1cd7f381dc
Matvienko-Sikar, Karen
93b8e9f3-287a-40d7-af0a-3a1ffb572e89
Carr, Helen
2d71148d-3a3f-4783-bba6-16697a350712
Alwan, Nisreen A.
0d37b320-f325-4ed3-ba51-0fe2866d5382
Godfrey, Keith
0931701e-fe2c-44b5-8f0d-ec5c7477a6fd
Schoenaker, Danielle, Lovegrove, Elizabeth, Santer, Miriam, Matvienko-Sikar, Karen, Carr, Helen, Alwan, Nisreen A. and Godfrey, Keith
(2025)
Priority topics for preconception care in general practice in the UK: a consensus study.
Australian Journal of Primary Health, 31 (4), [90].
(doi:10.1071/PYv31n4abs).
Record type:
Meeting abstract
Abstract
Background: primary care practitioners are well-positioned to support patients of reproductive age in preparing for pregnancy. Preconception care is ideally integrated when opportunities arise during routine consultations. However, practical and realistic guidance is needed to overcome implementation barriers, such as limited consultation time.
Aim: to achieve consensus among primary care practitioners and patients on topics that might be prioritised as part of opportunistic preconception care in general practice.
Methods: a three-step consensus process was undertaken: (1) identifying initial candidate topics through literature and guideline reviews, workshops with patients, and interviews with primary care practitioners; (2) prioritising topics using a three-round Delphi survey; and (3) reaching agreement on final priority topics through an online workshop. Participants were UK-based patients and primary care practitioners recruited via a Public Advisory Group, charities, and professional organisations.
Findings: the reviews and workshops/interviews with patients (n = 15) and practitioners (n = 14) identified 37 preconception care topics which were included in the Delphi survey. Eighty-five participants completed the first Delphi round, with 63 completing all three rounds. Based on the Delphi rounds, 11 topics were included and no topic met predefined criteria for exclusion. All topics were discussed at the final workshop (n = 21 participants)
and six additional topics achieved consensus to be included. Workshop participants agreed that the 17 priority topics should be combined into four topic areas: (1) knowledge of preconception health and pregnancy, (2) ideas, concerns and expectations (e.g. pregnancy intention, timing, prior pregnancy experiences), (3) health conditions (e.g. medication use, mental and physical health, immunisation), and (4) health behaviours (e.g. folic acid supplement use, smoking, alcohol consumption).
Implications: the agreed priority topic areas offer a structured foundation for opportunistic patient-centred preconception care in primary care. The findings support the need for further co-development of practical tools and support to enable implementation in routine practice.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 8 August 2025
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 506283
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/506283
ISSN: 1448-7527
PURE UUID: dea28561-605b-49ee-9cd4-82063af3bdc5
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 03 Nov 2025 17:33
Last modified: 04 Nov 2025 03:07
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Karen Matvienko-Sikar
Author:
Helen Carr
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics