The impact of point-of-care testing for influenza on antimicrobial stewardship in UK primary care: nested cohort study

Abstract

Background: influenza and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) predominantly circulate during the winter season and cause acute respiratory illness (ARI). Deploying molecular point-of-care testing (POCT) in primary care can inform whether a patient presenting with an ARI has influenza or RSV. An early virological diagnosis could facilitate appropriate use of antivirals and enable better antimicrobial stewardship.

Objective: this study aimed to report the impact of POCT for influenza and RSV on antimicrobial prescribing, including antiviral therapy in primary care.

Methods: the impact of POCT for influenza on antimicrobial stewardship (PIAMS) in UK primary care was a nested cohort study undertaken from January 20 to May 31, 2023, after the period of peak virus circulation, within practices that contribute data to the English sentinel network. People presenting with ARI had a nasopharyngeal swab performed and were tested for influenza and RSV with a molecular POCT analyzer located within the practice. Data on antimicrobial prescribing and other study outcomes were collected by linking information from the analyzer to coded data from the patient’s computerized medical record.

Results: in total, 323 swabs were collected from 10 PIAMS study practices. In total, 59.7% (197/323) of swabbed patients were female, and the mean age was 37.28 (SD 25.05) years. Furthermore, 2.9% (9/323) of all swabs were positive, with 0.3% (1/323) positive for influenza A, 1.6% (5/323) positive for influenza B, and 0.9% (3/323) positive for RSV. In total, 80 patients were prescribed antibiotics 7 days following POCT testing. There were no instances of antiviral prescribing in the 7 days post testing. A statistically significant difference in antibiotic prescribing given a positive POCT result compared with a negative test was not found with an unadjusted odds ratio (OR) of 7 days post testing. A statistically significant difference in antibiotic prescribing given a positive POCT result compared with a negative test was not found with an unadjusted OR of 1.54 (95% CI 0.38‐6.30; P=.55) and adjusted OR of 1.21 (95% CI 0.00‐1.78).

Conclusions: this study illustrates the risk of having a narrow study window; our observation period was not aligned with when influenza was circulating. The peak of weekly incidence of influenza in the sentinel network was in the last week of 2022, and RSV was circulating before this. Further evidence is needed to assess the impact of POCT on antimicrobial prescribing. The viruses tested for using POCT could be aligned with the circulating viruses identified by the sentinel network.

More information

Identifiers

ORCID for Tristan Clark: orcid.org/0000-0001-6026-5295

Catalogue record

Export record

Altmetrics