Validation of the ADAMO Care Watch for step counting in older adults
Validation of the ADAMO Care Watch for step counting in older adults
Background
Accurate measurement devices are required to objectively quantify physical activity. Wearable activity monitors, such as pedometers, may serve as affordable and feasible instruments for measuring physical activity levels in older adults during their normal activities of daily living. Currently few available accelerometer-based steps counting devices have been shown to be accurate at slow walking speeds, therefore there is still lacking appropriate devices tailored for slow speed ambulation, typical of older adults.
This study aimed to assess the validity of step counting using the pedometer function of the ADAMO Care Watch, containing an embedded algorithm for measuring physical activity in older adults.
Methods
Twenty older adults aged ≥ 65 years (mean ± SD, 75±7 years; range, 68–91) and 20 young adults (25±5 years, range 20–40), wore a care watch on each wrist and performed a number of randomly ordered tasks: walking at slow, normal and fast self-paced speeds; a Timed Up and Go test (TUG); a step test and ascending/descending stairs. The criterion measure was the actual number of steps observed, counted with a manual tally counter. Absolute percentage error scores, Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC), and Bland–Altman plots were used to assess validity.
Results
ADAMO Care Watch demonstrated high validity during slow and normal speeds (range 0.5–1.5 m/s) showing an absolute error from 1.3% to 1.9% in the older adult group and from 0.7% to 2.7% in the young adult group. The percentage error for the 30-metre walking tasks increased with faster pace in both young adult (17%) and older adult groups (6%). In the TUG test, there was less error in the steps recorded for older adults (1.3% to 2.2%) than the young adults (6.6% to 7.2%). For the total sample, the ICCs for the ADAMO Care Watch for the 30-metre walking tasks at each speed and for the TUG test were ranged between 0.931 to 0.985.
Conclusion
These findings provide evidence that the ADAMO Care Watch demonstrated highly accurate measurements of the steps count in all activities, particularly walking at normal and slow speeds. Therefore, these data support the inclusion of the ADAMO Care Watch in clinical applications for measuring the number of steps taken by older adults at normal, slow walking speeds.
Magistro, Daniele
ab9296bc-fda6-469e-a3f8-3a574faa1b7e
Brustio, Paolo Riccardo
dbfe36e8-5df8-4004-95bb-d78bf259c239
Ivaldi, Marco
bd858e2a-b60a-43db-89ac-36cf12e49343
Esliger, Dale Winfield
9bd776a2-4785-48b8-87f6-1fae8c0d5b3f
Zecca, Massimiliano
870c8b27-684b-42b3-baed-40dd996c2800
Rainoldi, Alberto
f0d1a944-72c8-476d-96ef-bd470c39ed43
Boccia, Gennaro
d0db92c1-8d73-432d-83ef-f0482e69bbd0
9 February 2018
Magistro, Daniele
ab9296bc-fda6-469e-a3f8-3a574faa1b7e
Brustio, Paolo Riccardo
dbfe36e8-5df8-4004-95bb-d78bf259c239
Ivaldi, Marco
bd858e2a-b60a-43db-89ac-36cf12e49343
Esliger, Dale Winfield
9bd776a2-4785-48b8-87f6-1fae8c0d5b3f
Zecca, Massimiliano
870c8b27-684b-42b3-baed-40dd996c2800
Rainoldi, Alberto
f0d1a944-72c8-476d-96ef-bd470c39ed43
Boccia, Gennaro
d0db92c1-8d73-432d-83ef-f0482e69bbd0
Magistro, Daniele, Brustio, Paolo Riccardo, Ivaldi, Marco, Esliger, Dale Winfield, Zecca, Massimiliano, Rainoldi, Alberto and Boccia, Gennaro
(2018)
Validation of the ADAMO Care Watch for step counting in older adults.
PLoS ONE.
(doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0190753).
Abstract
Background
Accurate measurement devices are required to objectively quantify physical activity. Wearable activity monitors, such as pedometers, may serve as affordable and feasible instruments for measuring physical activity levels in older adults during their normal activities of daily living. Currently few available accelerometer-based steps counting devices have been shown to be accurate at slow walking speeds, therefore there is still lacking appropriate devices tailored for slow speed ambulation, typical of older adults.
This study aimed to assess the validity of step counting using the pedometer function of the ADAMO Care Watch, containing an embedded algorithm for measuring physical activity in older adults.
Methods
Twenty older adults aged ≥ 65 years (mean ± SD, 75±7 years; range, 68–91) and 20 young adults (25±5 years, range 20–40), wore a care watch on each wrist and performed a number of randomly ordered tasks: walking at slow, normal and fast self-paced speeds; a Timed Up and Go test (TUG); a step test and ascending/descending stairs. The criterion measure was the actual number of steps observed, counted with a manual tally counter. Absolute percentage error scores, Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC), and Bland–Altman plots were used to assess validity.
Results
ADAMO Care Watch demonstrated high validity during slow and normal speeds (range 0.5–1.5 m/s) showing an absolute error from 1.3% to 1.9% in the older adult group and from 0.7% to 2.7% in the young adult group. The percentage error for the 30-metre walking tasks increased with faster pace in both young adult (17%) and older adult groups (6%). In the TUG test, there was less error in the steps recorded for older adults (1.3% to 2.2%) than the young adults (6.6% to 7.2%). For the total sample, the ICCs for the ADAMO Care Watch for the 30-metre walking tasks at each speed and for the TUG test were ranged between 0.931 to 0.985.
Conclusion
These findings provide evidence that the ADAMO Care Watch demonstrated highly accurate measurements of the steps count in all activities, particularly walking at normal and slow speeds. Therefore, these data support the inclusion of the ADAMO Care Watch in clinical applications for measuring the number of steps taken by older adults at normal, slow walking speeds.
Text
file
- Version of Record
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 6 December 2017
Published date: 9 February 2018
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 506357
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/506357
ISSN: 1932-6203
PURE UUID: d0cdd58e-98f2-452d-bfa3-29fccf87c9ae
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 05 Nov 2025 17:32
Last modified: 06 Nov 2025 03:15
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Daniele Magistro
Author:
Paolo Riccardo Brustio
Author:
Marco Ivaldi
Author:
Dale Winfield Esliger
Author:
Massimiliano Zecca
Author:
Alberto Rainoldi
Author:
Gennaro Boccia
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics