The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Design and deployment of digital health interventions to reduce the risk of the digital divide and to inform development of the living with COVID recovery: a systematic scoping review

Design and deployment of digital health interventions to reduce the risk of the digital divide and to inform development of the living with COVID recovery: a systematic scoping review
Design and deployment of digital health interventions to reduce the risk of the digital divide and to inform development of the living with COVID recovery: a systematic scoping review
Background
Digital health interventions can support health-related knowledge transfer, for example through websites or mobile applications, and may reduce health inequalities by making health care available, where access is difficult, and by translating content to overcome language barriers. However, digital health intervention can also increase health inequalities due to the digital divide. To reach digitally excluded populations, design and delivery mechanisms need to specifically address this issue.

This review was conducted during the evolving COVID-19 pandemic and informed the rapid design, deployment and evaluation of a post-COVID-19 rehabilitation digital health intervention: ‘Living with COVID Recovery’ (LWCR). LWCR needed to be engaging and usable for patients and to avoid exacerbating health inequalities. LWCR was introduced as a service into 33 NHS clinics, was used by 7679 patients, and evaluation ran from August 2020 to December 2022.

Objective
To identify evidence-based digital health intervention design and deployment features conducive to mitigating the digital divide.

Methods
Cochrane Library, Epistemonikos, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Evidence, PROSPERO, PubMed (with MEDLINE and Europe PMC) and Turning Research into Practice; OpenGrey and Google Scholar were searched for primary research studies published in English from 1 October 2011 to 1 October 2021.

Setting and population
Adults who were likely to be affected by the digital divide, including older age, minority ethnic groups, lower income/education level and in any healthcare setting.

Interventions
Any digital health intervention with features of design and/or deployment intended to enable access and engagement by the population of focus.

Comparators
Any or none.

Outcome measures
Any related to participants’ access and/or use of digital health intervention and/or change in digital skills and confidence.

Analysis
Data from studies that met the inclusion criteria were extracted, narratively synthesised and thematically analysed.

Results
Twenty-two papers met the inclusion criteria. Digital health interventions evaluated included telehealth, text message interventions, virtual assistants, self-management programmes and decision aids.

Design themes included
Co-development with end-users, user testing through iterative design cycles, digital health interventions that also helped improve digital skills and digital health literacy, tailoring for low literacy through animations, pictures, videos and writing for low reading ages; virtual assistants to collect information from patients and guide the use of a digital health intervention.

Deployment themes included
Free devices and data, or signposting to sources of cheap/free devices and Wi-Fi, text message interventions, providing ‘human support’, providing tailored digital skills education as part of the intervention and enabling peer/family support.

Limitations
Our search extended to late 2021, and there has been a massive increase in the literature following the pandemic. However, as our review was undertaken to inform the LWCR digital health intervention design and deployment, we have reported the results that informed this work. The studies included in the review were heterogeneous, so generalisability may be limited. Few randomised controlled trials assessed the digital health intervention’s impact on digital health skills by using validated measures.

Conclusions
Using the design and deployment findings described above when developing digital health interventions may help overcome the digital divide. Beyond informing the LWCR digital health intervention development, the review findings have wider implications for the equitable design, delivery and evaluation of digital health interventions.
DIGITAL DIVIDE, DIGITAL HEALTH LITERACY, E-HEALTH LITERACY, GREY LITERATURE, HEALTHCARE INEQUALITIES, INTERNET-BASED INTERVENTION, MHEALTH, TELEMEDICINE
2755-0079
1-18
Hamilton, Fiona L.
3ed5bd8f-5cbd-468e-bf0b-9886b87ad89e
imran, summayah
14e4c46b-60db-4cfd-bbd3-bf146bc16a4d
Mahmood, Aamina
41c0b0c2-1103-4d21-8dfe-09ef61b031ca
Dobbin, Joanna
3c6e7db0-aa1a-4d6a-b215-52642dcc1ae0
Bradbury, Katherine
87fce0b9-d9c5-42b4-b041-bffeb4430863
Podulval, Shoba
0a1c2ef6-6e69-45a2-9665-c1d439ac9cb2
scuffell, jamie
7e75813d-b47a-478c-a34d-9c464ebb7691
thomas, fred
bdee33ef-231e-40d1-9deb-c5380e3cdd3a
Stevenson, Fiona A.
68366278-ef64-41e6-a7b2-099f1971ba8e
Hamilton, Fiona L.
3ed5bd8f-5cbd-468e-bf0b-9886b87ad89e
imran, summayah
14e4c46b-60db-4cfd-bbd3-bf146bc16a4d
Mahmood, Aamina
41c0b0c2-1103-4d21-8dfe-09ef61b031ca
Dobbin, Joanna
3c6e7db0-aa1a-4d6a-b215-52642dcc1ae0
Bradbury, Katherine
87fce0b9-d9c5-42b4-b041-bffeb4430863
Podulval, Shoba
0a1c2ef6-6e69-45a2-9665-c1d439ac9cb2
scuffell, jamie
7e75813d-b47a-478c-a34d-9c464ebb7691
thomas, fred
bdee33ef-231e-40d1-9deb-c5380e3cdd3a
Stevenson, Fiona A.
68366278-ef64-41e6-a7b2-099f1971ba8e

Hamilton, Fiona L., imran, summayah, Mahmood, Aamina, Dobbin, Joanna, Bradbury, Katherine, Podulval, Shoba, scuffell, jamie, thomas, fred and Stevenson, Fiona A. (2025) Design and deployment of digital health interventions to reduce the risk of the digital divide and to inform development of the living with COVID recovery: a systematic scoping review. Health and Social Care Delivery Research, 13 (39), 1-18. (doi:10.3310/GJHG1331).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background
Digital health interventions can support health-related knowledge transfer, for example through websites or mobile applications, and may reduce health inequalities by making health care available, where access is difficult, and by translating content to overcome language barriers. However, digital health intervention can also increase health inequalities due to the digital divide. To reach digitally excluded populations, design and delivery mechanisms need to specifically address this issue.

This review was conducted during the evolving COVID-19 pandemic and informed the rapid design, deployment and evaluation of a post-COVID-19 rehabilitation digital health intervention: ‘Living with COVID Recovery’ (LWCR). LWCR needed to be engaging and usable for patients and to avoid exacerbating health inequalities. LWCR was introduced as a service into 33 NHS clinics, was used by 7679 patients, and evaluation ran from August 2020 to December 2022.

Objective
To identify evidence-based digital health intervention design and deployment features conducive to mitigating the digital divide.

Methods
Cochrane Library, Epistemonikos, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Evidence, PROSPERO, PubMed (with MEDLINE and Europe PMC) and Turning Research into Practice; OpenGrey and Google Scholar were searched for primary research studies published in English from 1 October 2011 to 1 October 2021.

Setting and population
Adults who were likely to be affected by the digital divide, including older age, minority ethnic groups, lower income/education level and in any healthcare setting.

Interventions
Any digital health intervention with features of design and/or deployment intended to enable access and engagement by the population of focus.

Comparators
Any or none.

Outcome measures
Any related to participants’ access and/or use of digital health intervention and/or change in digital skills and confidence.

Analysis
Data from studies that met the inclusion criteria were extracted, narratively synthesised and thematically analysed.

Results
Twenty-two papers met the inclusion criteria. Digital health interventions evaluated included telehealth, text message interventions, virtual assistants, self-management programmes and decision aids.

Design themes included
Co-development with end-users, user testing through iterative design cycles, digital health interventions that also helped improve digital skills and digital health literacy, tailoring for low literacy through animations, pictures, videos and writing for low reading ages; virtual assistants to collect information from patients and guide the use of a digital health intervention.

Deployment themes included
Free devices and data, or signposting to sources of cheap/free devices and Wi-Fi, text message interventions, providing ‘human support’, providing tailored digital skills education as part of the intervention and enabling peer/family support.

Limitations
Our search extended to late 2021, and there has been a massive increase in the literature following the pandemic. However, as our review was undertaken to inform the LWCR digital health intervention design and deployment, we have reported the results that informed this work. The studies included in the review were heterogeneous, so generalisability may be limited. Few randomised controlled trials assessed the digital health intervention’s impact on digital health skills by using validated measures.

Conclusions
Using the design and deployment findings described above when developing digital health interventions may help overcome the digital divide. Beyond informing the LWCR digital health intervention development, the review findings have wider implications for the equitable design, delivery and evaluation of digital health interventions.

Text
3048967 - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (974kB)

More information

Published date: 23 October 2025
Keywords: DIGITAL DIVIDE, DIGITAL HEALTH LITERACY, E-HEALTH LITERACY, GREY LITERATURE, HEALTHCARE INEQUALITIES, INTERNET-BASED INTERVENTION, MHEALTH, TELEMEDICINE

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 506416
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/506416
ISSN: 2755-0079
PURE UUID: ff34edcf-6259-4c30-969c-068cad91744c
ORCID for Katherine Bradbury: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-5513-7571

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 06 Nov 2025 17:46
Last modified: 19 Nov 2025 17:48

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Fiona L. Hamilton
Author: summayah imran
Author: Aamina Mahmood
Author: Joanna Dobbin
Author: Shoba Podulval
Author: jamie scuffell
Author: fred thomas
Author: Fiona A. Stevenson

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×