The relationship between skinfold and ultrasound measures of subcutaneous fat in untrained healthy males
The relationship between skinfold and ultrasound measures of subcutaneous fat in untrained healthy males
Ultrasound measurement of adipose tissue offers an alternative measure of body composition with less technical skill requirement than skinfolds. However, the relationship between skinfold and ultrasound measurements of adipose tissue is uncertain. The aim of this study was to compare these measures in a healthy untrained male population. One hundred male participants (aged 18–40 years) of varying body compositions had skinfold measures taken at the biceps, triceps and front thigh sites. Ultrasound measures were also taken at the same sites using B-wave ultrasound with a linear probe in the transverse plane. Strong, significant (p < 0.01), positive correlations were observed between skinfold and ultrasound measures at the biceps (r = 0.828), triceps (r = 0.813), and front thigh (r = 0.888) sites. However, there was significant (p < 0.01) variance between the techniques at all measurement sites. Whilst skinfold and ultrasound measures of adipose tissue have good linear agreement, skinfolds are consistently higher at all sites indicating a difference in the nature of the tissue measured via each technique. The exact nature of the relationship should be established on a population-specific basis.
Ryan-Stewart, Helen
76ced50b-4300-49dd-8437-fcd32b1a5fb1
O’Leary, Abigail
34fe2e34-41de-4857-a701-fb99527557c7
Paine, Eloise
0eaebc3a-0c08-42f3-8cef-ad1a250dd8a3
Faulkner, James
b2bd38c9-667c-42e8-ad1e-6df58d1e3f7a
Jobson, Simon
708be525-2bdb-43a0-a6ee-1dd666347611
10 November 2021
Ryan-Stewart, Helen
76ced50b-4300-49dd-8437-fcd32b1a5fb1
O’Leary, Abigail
34fe2e34-41de-4857-a701-fb99527557c7
Paine, Eloise
0eaebc3a-0c08-42f3-8cef-ad1a250dd8a3
Faulkner, James
b2bd38c9-667c-42e8-ad1e-6df58d1e3f7a
Jobson, Simon
708be525-2bdb-43a0-a6ee-1dd666347611
Ryan-Stewart, Helen, O’Leary, Abigail, Paine, Eloise, Faulkner, James and Jobson, Simon
(2021)
The relationship between skinfold and ultrasound measures of subcutaneous fat in untrained healthy males.
Applied Sciences, 11 (22), [10561].
(doi:10.3390/app112210561).
Abstract
Ultrasound measurement of adipose tissue offers an alternative measure of body composition with less technical skill requirement than skinfolds. However, the relationship between skinfold and ultrasound measurements of adipose tissue is uncertain. The aim of this study was to compare these measures in a healthy untrained male population. One hundred male participants (aged 18–40 years) of varying body compositions had skinfold measures taken at the biceps, triceps and front thigh sites. Ultrasound measures were also taken at the same sites using B-wave ultrasound with a linear probe in the transverse plane. Strong, significant (p < 0.01), positive correlations were observed between skinfold and ultrasound measures at the biceps (r = 0.828), triceps (r = 0.813), and front thigh (r = 0.888) sites. However, there was significant (p < 0.01) variance between the techniques at all measurement sites. Whilst skinfold and ultrasound measures of adipose tissue have good linear agreement, skinfolds are consistently higher at all sites indicating a difference in the nature of the tissue measured via each technique. The exact nature of the relationship should be established on a population-specific basis.
Text
applsci-11-10561 (1)
- Version of Record
More information
Published date: 10 November 2021
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 506421
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/506421
ISSN: 2076-3417
PURE UUID: ca2ecef9-0012-4d1f-b8f9-ab3a28fd3eeb
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 06 Nov 2025 17:49
Last modified: 07 Nov 2025 03:07
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Helen Ryan-Stewart
Author:
Abigail O’Leary
Author:
Eloise Paine
Author:
James Faulkner
Author:
Simon Jobson
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics