The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Using a new video rating tool to crowd-source analysis of behavioural reaction to stimuli

Using a new video rating tool to crowd-source analysis of behavioural reaction to stimuli
Using a new video rating tool to crowd-source analysis of behavioural reaction to stimuli
Quantifying the intensity of animals’ reaction to stimuli is notoriously difficult as classic unidimensional measures of responses such as latency or duration of looking can fail to capture the overall strength of behavioural responses. More holistic rating can be useful but have the inherent risks of subjective bias and lack of repeatability. Here, we explored whether crowdsourcing could be used to efficiently and reliably overcome these potential flaws. A total of 396 participants watched online videos of dogs reacting to auditory stimuli and provided 23,248 ratings of the strength of the dogs’ responses from zero (default) to 100 using an online survey form. We found that raters achieved very high inter-rater reliability across multiple datasets (although their responses were affected by their sex, age, and attitude towards animals) and that as few as 10 raters could be used to achieve a reliable result. A linear mixed model applied to PCA components of behaviours discovered that the dogs’ facial expressions and head orientation influenced the strength of behaviour ratings the most. Further linear mixed models showed that that strength of behaviour ratings was moderately correlated to the duration of dogs’ reactions but not to dogs’ reaction latency (from the stimulus onset). This suggests that observers’ ratings captured consistent dimensions of animals’ responses that are not fully represented by more classic unidimensional metrics. Finally, we report that overall participants strongly enjoyed the experience. Thus, we suggest that using crowdsourcing can offer a useful, repeatable tool to assess behavioural intensity in experimental or observational studies where unidimensional coding may miss nuance, or where coding multiple dimensions may be too time-consuming.
1435-9456
947–956
Root-Gutteridge, Holly
7b442bac-7986-44ce-922f-a2da1e2696cc
Brown, Louise P.
8797f918-50d0-4540-a0a2-9ecb503bdf70
Forman, Jemma
d6d4d7c0-ba84-4132-8063-cf334b4adc59
Korzeniowska, Anna T.
6419ff9e-543f-4e41-8d14-1f4b05e231af
Simner, Julia
bb2156da-4da1-4485-8583-4b456b262541
Reby, David
3bf4c3ea-9eb0-4b1a-9fe8-bc7a5406387c
Root-Gutteridge, Holly
7b442bac-7986-44ce-922f-a2da1e2696cc
Brown, Louise P.
8797f918-50d0-4540-a0a2-9ecb503bdf70
Forman, Jemma
d6d4d7c0-ba84-4132-8063-cf334b4adc59
Korzeniowska, Anna T.
6419ff9e-543f-4e41-8d14-1f4b05e231af
Simner, Julia
bb2156da-4da1-4485-8583-4b456b262541
Reby, David
3bf4c3ea-9eb0-4b1a-9fe8-bc7a5406387c

Root-Gutteridge, Holly, Brown, Louise P., Forman, Jemma, Korzeniowska, Anna T., Simner, Julia and Reby, David (2021) Using a new video rating tool to crowd-source analysis of behavioural reaction to stimuli. Animal Cognition, 24, 947–956. (doi:10.1007/s10071-021-01490-8).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Quantifying the intensity of animals’ reaction to stimuli is notoriously difficult as classic unidimensional measures of responses such as latency or duration of looking can fail to capture the overall strength of behavioural responses. More holistic rating can be useful but have the inherent risks of subjective bias and lack of repeatability. Here, we explored whether crowdsourcing could be used to efficiently and reliably overcome these potential flaws. A total of 396 participants watched online videos of dogs reacting to auditory stimuli and provided 23,248 ratings of the strength of the dogs’ responses from zero (default) to 100 using an online survey form. We found that raters achieved very high inter-rater reliability across multiple datasets (although their responses were affected by their sex, age, and attitude towards animals) and that as few as 10 raters could be used to achieve a reliable result. A linear mixed model applied to PCA components of behaviours discovered that the dogs’ facial expressions and head orientation influenced the strength of behaviour ratings the most. Further linear mixed models showed that that strength of behaviour ratings was moderately correlated to the duration of dogs’ reactions but not to dogs’ reaction latency (from the stimulus onset). This suggests that observers’ ratings captured consistent dimensions of animals’ responses that are not fully represented by more classic unidimensional metrics. Finally, we report that overall participants strongly enjoyed the experience. Thus, we suggest that using crowdsourcing can offer a useful, repeatable tool to assess behavioural intensity in experimental or observational studies where unidimensional coding may miss nuance, or where coding multiple dimensions may be too time-consuming.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 9 March 2021

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 506422
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/506422
ISSN: 1435-9456
PURE UUID: b2c17df0-4ca5-4b8b-b6b4-d29a3a504614
ORCID for Anna T. Korzeniowska: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-5518-6349

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 06 Nov 2025 17:49
Last modified: 07 Nov 2025 03:02

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Holly Root-Gutteridge
Author: Louise P. Brown
Author: Jemma Forman
Author: Anna T. Korzeniowska ORCID iD
Author: Julia Simner
Author: David Reby

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×