The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Mapping the evidence on occupational exoskeleton use for the workforce in healthcare, social care, and industry: A systematic scoping review

Mapping the evidence on occupational exoskeleton use for the workforce in healthcare, social care, and industry: A systematic scoping review
Mapping the evidence on occupational exoskeleton use for the workforce in healthcare, social care, and industry: A systematic scoping review
Musculoskeletal disorders remain a leading occupational health challenge in physically demanding sectors such as healthcare, social care, and industry. Exoskeletons – wearable devices designed to mitigate physical strain are increasingly explored as potential solutions; however, factors affecting their adoption in real-world settings remain underexplored. This novel scoping review systematically maps the existing evidence on the application of commercially available exoskeletons within real and simulated work environments, focusing on usage patterns, user experiences, and factors influencing implementation.

Following the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews, a systematic literature search was conducted across the Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and MEDLINE, with an initial search in May 2023 and an update in May 2024. Forty-nine papers met the inclusion criteria based on the Population, Concept, and Context (PCC) framework. Data were extracted using a standardized form and synthesized descriptively, thematically, and through content analysis. Results are presented in narrative, tabular, and conceptual map formats.

Exoskeletons were used most frequently in industry (manufacturing) and perioperative care (healthcare). Although, the devices reduced muscle load during repetitive or static tasks, adoption was constrained by discomfort and fit challenges, thermal burden, and limited usability in dynamic settings. Thematic analysis revealed how user experiences were shaped by professional identity, task compatibility, organizational support, and social norms. A conceptual map synthesized sector-specific and cross-sectoral barriers and facilitators.

This review highlights the need for inclusive, context-sensitive, and longitudinal research to support safe, acceptable, and effective exoskeleton adoption and implementation across diverse occupational environments.
biomechanics, exoskeletons, exosuits, human–robot interaction, industry, performance characterisation
2631-7176
Bhat, Shilpy
cad6e688-0d6d-46c8-8529-4f0945b2e6d3
Gavin, James Peter
e0d9b404-3f63-4855-8e64-bf1692e6cc3f
Warner, Martin
f4dce73d-fb87-4f71-a3f0-078123aa040c
Myall, Michelle
0604ba0f-75c2-4783-9afe-aa54bf81513f
Bhat, Shilpy
cad6e688-0d6d-46c8-8529-4f0945b2e6d3
Gavin, James Peter
e0d9b404-3f63-4855-8e64-bf1692e6cc3f
Warner, Martin
f4dce73d-fb87-4f71-a3f0-078123aa040c
Myall, Michelle
0604ba0f-75c2-4783-9afe-aa54bf81513f

Bhat, Shilpy, Gavin, James Peter, Warner, Martin and Myall, Michelle (2025) Mapping the evidence on occupational exoskeleton use for the workforce in healthcare, social care, and industry: A systematic scoping review. Wearable Technologies, 6, [e53]. (doi:10.1017/wtc.2025.10033).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Musculoskeletal disorders remain a leading occupational health challenge in physically demanding sectors such as healthcare, social care, and industry. Exoskeletons – wearable devices designed to mitigate physical strain are increasingly explored as potential solutions; however, factors affecting their adoption in real-world settings remain underexplored. This novel scoping review systematically maps the existing evidence on the application of commercially available exoskeletons within real and simulated work environments, focusing on usage patterns, user experiences, and factors influencing implementation.

Following the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews, a systematic literature search was conducted across the Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and MEDLINE, with an initial search in May 2023 and an update in May 2024. Forty-nine papers met the inclusion criteria based on the Population, Concept, and Context (PCC) framework. Data were extracted using a standardized form and synthesized descriptively, thematically, and through content analysis. Results are presented in narrative, tabular, and conceptual map formats.

Exoskeletons were used most frequently in industry (manufacturing) and perioperative care (healthcare). Although, the devices reduced muscle load during repetitive or static tasks, adoption was constrained by discomfort and fit challenges, thermal burden, and limited usability in dynamic settings. Thematic analysis revealed how user experiences were shaped by professional identity, task compatibility, organizational support, and social norms. A conceptual map synthesized sector-specific and cross-sectoral barriers and facilitators.

This review highlights the need for inclusive, context-sensitive, and longitudinal research to support safe, acceptable, and effective exoskeleton adoption and implementation across diverse occupational environments.

Text
Bhat_Scoping Review_Accepted manuscript_30October2025 - Accepted Manuscript
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy
Text
mapping-the-evidence-on-occupational-exoskeleton-use-for-the-workforce-in-healthcare-social-care-and-industry-a-systematic-scoping-review - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (873kB)
Text
Bhat et al. supplementary material 1
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (612kB)
Text
Bhat et al. supplementary material 2
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (195kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 28 September 2025
Published date: 28 October 2025
Keywords: biomechanics, exoskeletons, exosuits, human–robot interaction, industry, performance characterisation

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 506429
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/506429
ISSN: 2631-7176
PURE UUID: 088aef33-802c-4056-88dc-ff7272839cc3
ORCID for Shilpy Bhat: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-1458-7458
ORCID for James Peter Gavin: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-0574-0502
ORCID for Martin Warner: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-1483-0561
ORCID for Michelle Myall: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-8733-7412

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 06 Nov 2025 17:53
Last modified: 11 Nov 2025 03:01

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Shilpy Bhat ORCID iD
Author: Martin Warner ORCID iD
Author: Michelle Myall ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×