Policy preferences in response to large forced migration inflows
Policy preferences in response to large forced migration inflows
What migration policies do people in receiving countries prefer, and to what extent do humanitarian concerns matter for these preferences? Despite sustained scholarly attention to migration attitudes in high-income countries, much less work examines public policy preferences—particularly in low- and middle-income countries that receive most forced migrants globally. While legislators can propose and implement migration policies involving multiple domains that differ in restrictiveness, their choices partly rely on public support that may vary depending on the policy area at stake. This makes understanding preferences for realistic migration policies in a multidimensional manner theoretically and empirically important. In response, we conducted a pre-registered conjoint experiment (N = 2,508) fielded in Colombia, the country that has received the largest share of Venezuelan emigrants who themselves currently comprise one of the world’s largest migratory flows. Colombians prefer more open policy options that place either some or no restrictions on Venezuelan migrants’ labor market access, ability to bring family members, access to public healthcare, or freedom to choose where they live within Colombia. However, there is support for restrictions on the overall number of Venezuelans allowed to settle in the country, as well as the length of time that Venezuelans are allowed to stay in Colombia. Moreover, respondents holding higher levels of humanitarianism prefer less restrictive policies towards Venezuelans relative to those holding stronger economic and material values—particularly in domains addressing core needs of health, family reunification, and employment. Our study contributes novel and timely evidence of multidimensional migration policy preferences from a highly-impacted case, while also showing how altruistic values relating to humanitarianism selectively matter for these preferences.
Allen, William
f0d4731a-81c1-4886-b11c-74dfa412bb97
Ruiz, Isabel
81848ab1-24af-4be0-b37e-7f70e6141826
Vargas-Silva, Carlos
455011d7-7fad-4bb6-809f-f7cf137289cb
February 2024
Allen, William
f0d4731a-81c1-4886-b11c-74dfa412bb97
Ruiz, Isabel
81848ab1-24af-4be0-b37e-7f70e6141826
Vargas-Silva, Carlos
455011d7-7fad-4bb6-809f-f7cf137289cb
Allen, William, Ruiz, Isabel and Vargas-Silva, Carlos
(2024)
Policy preferences in response to large forced migration inflows.
World Development, 174.
(doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2023.106462).
Abstract
What migration policies do people in receiving countries prefer, and to what extent do humanitarian concerns matter for these preferences? Despite sustained scholarly attention to migration attitudes in high-income countries, much less work examines public policy preferences—particularly in low- and middle-income countries that receive most forced migrants globally. While legislators can propose and implement migration policies involving multiple domains that differ in restrictiveness, their choices partly rely on public support that may vary depending on the policy area at stake. This makes understanding preferences for realistic migration policies in a multidimensional manner theoretically and empirically important. In response, we conducted a pre-registered conjoint experiment (N = 2,508) fielded in Colombia, the country that has received the largest share of Venezuelan emigrants who themselves currently comprise one of the world’s largest migratory flows. Colombians prefer more open policy options that place either some or no restrictions on Venezuelan migrants’ labor market access, ability to bring family members, access to public healthcare, or freedom to choose where they live within Colombia. However, there is support for restrictions on the overall number of Venezuelans allowed to settle in the country, as well as the length of time that Venezuelans are allowed to stay in Colombia. Moreover, respondents holding higher levels of humanitarianism prefer less restrictive policies towards Venezuelans relative to those holding stronger economic and material values—particularly in domains addressing core needs of health, family reunification, and employment. Our study contributes novel and timely evidence of multidimensional migration policy preferences from a highly-impacted case, while also showing how altruistic values relating to humanitarianism selectively matter for these preferences.
Text
1-s2.0-S0305750X23002802-main
- Version of Record
More information
e-pub ahead of print date: 11 November 2023
Published date: February 2024
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 506453
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/506453
ISSN: 0305-750X
PURE UUID: 7036ec4a-93ee-4bbc-a28e-228b72e3b1e6
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 07 Nov 2025 17:39
Last modified: 08 Nov 2025 03:13
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
William Allen
Author:
Isabel Ruiz
Author:
Carlos Vargas-Silva
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics